STREAMING & DIGITAL MEDIA

Ad-Supported vs Premium Content Preference Survey

Streaming audiences evaluate ad load tolerance, subscription pricing, and content access trade-offs across platforms, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, benchmark pricing tiers, and reduce subscriber churn.

Multi-Platform sample
Streaming consumers (Active Paid and Free-Tier Users)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Ad tolerance & conversion signalsIdentify where ad fatigue triggers upgrade intent or platform abandonment.
Tier preference & pricing sensitivityBenchmark willingness-to-pay thresholds across free, mid, and premium tiers.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most streaming and media executives don't lose subscribers purely on content volume. They lose them due to ad load tolerance mismatches, tier pricing friction, content exclusivity gaps, platform-switching triggers, and willingness-to-pay miscalibration, none of which fully show up in churn dashboards or platform engagement analytics.

If you are...

  • AVOD vs SVOD tier strategist
  • Streaming platform monetisation lead
  • Content licensing or acquisition head
  • Ad revenue and yield manager
  • Subscriber growth and retention lead

You're likely facing...

  • Ad tolerance vs churn trade-off
  • Tier upgrade conversion stalling
  • AVOD = cheap/inferior perception
  • Premium = overpriced/underused perception
  • Segment split: price vs content value

This will help answer...

  • Ad load threshold by segment
  • Tier upgrade and downgrade triggers
  • Premium vs ad-supported preference drivers
  • Willingness-to-pay by content genre
  • Switching and cancellation inflection points

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete viewer journey from first content discovery to long-term subscription commitment.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Awareness

  • First content touchpoint channels
  • Ad-supported platform trial triggers
TENETS 02

Tier Preference Drivers

  • Ad tolerance vs. subscription cost trade-off
  • Free tier selection criteria
TENETS 03

Ad Experience

  • Ad format tolerance by content genre
  • Skip behavior and ad fatigue signals
TENETS 04

Content & Catalog

  • Exclusive content as upgrade trigger
  • Catalog depth across ad-supported tiers
TENETS 05

Pricing & WTP

  • Monthly spend ceiling by tier type
  • Bundle pricing sensitivity signals
TENETS 06

Upgrade & Churn

  • Tier upgrade and downgrade triggers
  • Cancellation intent by service type
TENETS 07

Platform Trust

  • Data privacy concerns on free tiers
  • Ad targeting perception and brand trust
TENETS 08

Competitive Switching

  • Cross-platform switching frequency
  • Competitor tier benchmarks by viewer segment

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Ad-Supported vs Premium Content Preference Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking ad-supported vs premium tier preference by segment
2
Measuring willingness to pay across content categories
3
Comparing switching triggers by age, income, and platform
Deliverables
Preference ranking matrix
Willingness-to-pay bands
Segment comparison report
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Older or low-digital streaming audiences in Tier 2 markets
2
Quick quota fill across underrepresented viewer segments
Deliverables
Audience coverage log
Tier-split diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-spend subscribers requiring in-depth preference verification
2
Contextual mapping of household co-viewing and plan decisions
Deliverables
Subscriber journey maps
Household decision profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Messaging concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting streaming audiences across free, ad-supported, and premium tier segments to capture preference and switching data at scale.
Consider adding: CATI for Tier 2 and low-digital viewer segments, plus a focused FGD layer to pressure-test ad tolerance thresholds and refine tier upgrade messaging.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the streaming and digital media space.

CASELET 1

Subscription tier preference & willingness-to-pay mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Ad tolerance & content interruption friction study (Southeast Asia)

Subscription tier preference & willingness-to-pay mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A regional streaming platform needed to map how light viewers , binge-heavy households , and mobile-first users evaluated subscription tiers, and which pricing thresholds triggered downgrade or cancellation decisions.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a quant survey across 1,200 respondents in 6 Indian metros, capturing tier selection logic , price sensitivity bands , feature trade-off rankings , and stated downgrade triggers by household income segment and device type.

DELIVERED

A pricing corridor by segment, a feature-value trade-off framework ranking which benefits justified premium spend, and a churn-risk segment map identifying the three audience groups most likely to downgrade within 90 days.
CASELET 1

Subscription tier preference & willingness-to-pay mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Ad tolerance & content interruption friction study (Southeast Asia)

Subscription tier preference & willingness-to-pay mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A regional streaming platform needed to map how light viewers , binge-heavy households , and mobile-first users evaluated subscription tiers, and which pricing thresholds triggered downgrade or cancellation decisions.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a quant survey across 1,200 respondents in 6 Indian metros, capturing tier selection logic , price sensitivity bands , feature trade-off rankings , and stated downgrade triggers by household income segment and device type.

DELIVERED

A pricing corridor by segment, a feature-value trade-off framework ranking which benefits justified premium spend, and a churn-risk segment map identifying the three audience groups most likely to downgrade within 90 days.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between ad-supported tier subscribers, premium tier subscribers and free ad-only viewers?

How will you measure content tier preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full subscription decision journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our tier migration and retention conversion rates?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call