Aerospace & Defence Equipment Brand Credibility & Procurement Head Survey
Procurement heads in aerospace and defence evaluate, compare, and choose equipment suppliers on technical credibility, compliance track record, and after-support reliability, so you can sharpen positioning, fix conversion gaps in tender cycles, and benchmark your brand against shortlisted competitors.
CONTEXT & RELEVANCE
Why run this survey now
Most defence equipment suppliers don't lose procurement shortlists purely on technical specification. They lose them due to unverified brand credibility, misaligned vendor reputation signals, opaque past-performance records, weak offset compliance visibility, and inconsistent after-support perception, none of which fully show up in RFP scoring sheets or vendor registration portals.
If you are...
- OEM competing on multi-year defence contracts
- Tier-1 supplier entering new procurement cycles
- Head of Defence Business Development
- Procurement Strategy or Vendor Qualification Lead
RESEARCH THEMES
What This Survey Investigates
Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete procurement head journey from vendor shortlisting to contract award.
Brand Awareness & Recall
- Unaided brand recall, defence segment
- First OEM considered, domestic vs. foreign
Vendor Shortlisting Criteria
- Technical compliance, certification thresholds
- Offset obligation, indigenisation requirements
Credibility Signals
- Past contract references, allied forces
- Field trial outcomes, certification proof
Procurement Friction
- RFP-to-contract cycle, delay triggers
- Inter-ministry approval bottlenecks
Pricing & Value
- Life-cycle cost benchmarks, TCO framing
- Price negotiation leverage, offset credits
After-Sales & Support
- In-country MRO capability, spares availability
- Field service response, uptime guarantees
Competitive Benchmarking
- OEM head-to-head, technical parity gaps
- Domestic vs. import preference shifts
Loyalty & Re-procurement
- Repeat contract triggers, incumbent advantage
- Switching barriers, vendor consolidation intent
SAMPLING STRATEGY
Tell us about your ideal sample
Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.
METHODOLOGY
Survey approach
For the Aerospace & Defence Equipment Brand Credibility & Procurement Head Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across procurement tiers.
EXECUTION PROCESS
How we execute
A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.
Define the decision frame
Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts
Define the decision frame
Design the instrument
Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)
Design the instrument
Lock the questionnaire
Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version
Lock the questionnaire
Pilot and calibrate
Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed
Pilot and calibrate
Run fieldwork
Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls
Run fieldwork
Assure quality
Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail
Assure quality
Prepare the dataset
Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions
Prepare the dataset
Analyse and synthesise
Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights
Analyse and synthesise
Deliver and align
Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations
Deliver and align
COMMERCIAL TERMS
Request a Commercial Proposal
Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.
Select Sample Size
Geography
Select Mode of Survey
Length of the Interview
$0.00
+ applicable taxes
Cost Breakdown
Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.
REFERENCE CASELETS
Reference
Real-world examples of survey work in the aerospace and defence procurement space.
Vendor credibility signals in defence MRO procurement (India)
OBJECTIVE
WHAT WE DID
DELIVERED
Vendor credibility signals in defence MRO procurement (India)
Equipment brand perception among PSU fleet maintenance heads (India)
Vendor credibility signals in defence MRO procurement (India)
OBJECTIVE
A defence-sector equipment supplier needed to identify which credibility signals drive shortlisting decisions among base-level procurement officers and depot-level technical evaluators when selecting MRO vendors for scheduled overhaul contracts.
WHAT WE DID
Ran a structured quant survey across 120 procurement and technical evaluation personnel, capturing vendor shortlisting criteria , certification weight , past-performance scoring , and OEM-authorisation influence at each stage of the tender evaluation process.
DELIVERED
A ranked credibility signal framework by evaluator type, a certification gap map showing where supplier credentials fell short of evaluator expectations, and a set of positioning territories to sharpen vendor communication at the pre-bid stage.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Common Questions
Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.
What decisions will this survey enable?
Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?
Can we see differences between platform OEMs, subsystem suppliers and MRO providers?
How will you measure brand credibility beyond simple ratings?
Will the survey map the full defence procurement journey and drop-offs?
Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?
How will findings improve our contract win rate?
Still have questions?
Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.