Agri-Input Brand Perception & Farmer Purchase Decision Survey
Map how smallholder and commercial farmers evaluate, compare, and choose fertilisers, pesticides, and seed brands across crop cycles, so you can sharpen positioning, fix channel conversion gaps, and benchmark acquisition against competing input brands.
CONTEXT & RELEVANCE
Why run this survey now
Most agri-input brands don't lose farmers purely on product efficacy. They lose them due to retailer influence, unverified peer recommendations, brand recall gaps at purchase, misaligned crop-stage messaging, and price-value confusion, none of which fully show up in distributor sales data or trade audit reports.
If you are...
- Agri-input brand competing regionally
- Crop nutrition or crop protection head
- Distributor network or channel lead
- Agri-marketing or brand positioning lead
RESEARCH THEMES
What This Survey Investigates
Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete farmer journey from crop-season planning to post-harvest brand advocacy.
Brand Awareness & Recall
- Unaided brand recall by crop segment
- First-heard channel, season, source
Purchase Triggers
- Seasonal buying trigger, crop stage
- Retailer push vs. farmer pull
Retailer & Channel
- Retailer influence on brand switch
- Last-mile channel preference by district
Product Trust & Efficacy
- Yield outcome as trust signal
- Counterfeit concern, verification behavior
Pricing & Willingness-to-Pay
- Price sensitivity by input category
- Credit purchase vs. cash purchase split
Brand Loyalty & Switch
- Repeat purchase rate by input type
- Switch triggers, loyalty-breaking events
Field Support & Agronomy
- Company agronomist visit frequency
- Demo plot impact on adoption rate
Competitive Positioning
- Head-to-head brand preference by crop
- Perceived gaps vs. nearest competitor
SAMPLING STRATEGY
Tell us about your ideal sample
Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.
METHODOLOGY
Survey approach
For the Agri-Input Brand Perception & Farmer Purchase Decision Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across diverse farming segments.
EXECUTION PROCESS
How we execute
A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.
Define the decision frame
Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts
Define the decision frame
Design the instrument
Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)
Design the instrument
Lock the questionnaire
Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version
Lock the questionnaire
Pilot and calibrate
Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed
Pilot and calibrate
Run fieldwork
Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls
Run fieldwork
Assure quality
Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail
Assure quality
Prepare the dataset
Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions
Prepare the dataset
Analyse and synthesise
Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights
Analyse and synthesise
Deliver and align
Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations
Deliver and align
COMMERCIAL TERMS
Request a Commercial Proposal
Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.
Select Sample Size
Geography
Select Mode of Survey
Length of the Interview
$0.00
+ applicable taxes
Cost Breakdown
Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.
REFERENCE CASELETS
Reference
Real-world examples of survey work in the agri-input and rural retail space.
Crop protection channel preference & retailer influence (India)
OBJECTIVE
WHAT WE DID
DELIVERED
Crop protection channel preference & retailer influence (India)
Fertiliser brand switching & loyalty driver segmentation (North India)
Crop protection channel preference & retailer influence (India)
OBJECTIVE
A mid-size crop protection company needed to map how smallholder farmers and progressive farmers shortlist products at the point of purchase, and how much retailer recommendation versus brand recall drives the final pick.
WHAT WE DID
Ran a structured quant survey across 6 agri-dominant states, covering 480 farmers, capturing retailer visit frequency, product shortlisting triggers, brand recall unprompted, price sensitivity thresholds, and the weight assigned to agronomist advice versus peer referral.
DELIVERED
A channel influence map by farmer segment, a ranked trigger hierarchy from awareness to shelf pick, a retailer leverage index by crop zone, and a message territory framework for each farmer profile.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Common Questions
Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.
What decisions will this survey enable?
Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?
Can we see differences between smallholder farmers, progressive farmers and contract farming participants?
How will you measure brand preference beyond simple ratings?
Will the survey map the full input purchase journey and drop-offs?
Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?
How will findings improve our agri-dealer channel and season-launch strategy?
Still have questions?
Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.