COMMERCIAL TYRES & FLEET

B2B Tyre Fleet Client Satisfaction & Fleet Manager Vendor Advocacy Survey

Fleet Managers evaluate, compare, and choose tyre vendors on service reliability, total cost of ownership, and contract flexibility, so you can sharpen retention strategy, fix pricing positioning, and convert at-risk accounts before renewal cycles close.

Pan-India sample
Fleet operators (Fleet Managers, Procurement Heads)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Vendor switching signalsIdentify which service gaps trigger Fleet Managers to evaluate competing tyre suppliers.
Satisfaction drivers & advocacy gapsBenchmark satisfaction scores across contract terms, uptime support, and billing transparency.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most fleet tyre suppliers don't lose commercial fleet contracts purely on tyre price. They lose them due to inconsistent field service response, misaligned tread-life guarantees, opaque cost-per-kilometre reporting, poor account manager continuity, and slow emergency replacement turnaround, none of which fully show up in sales CRM records or invoice-level spend data.

If you are...

  • Fleet tyre brand vs retreader competition
  • National account manager, large fleets
  • Tyre product planning lead
  • Fleet sales and retention head
  • Commercial vehicle aftersales strategist

You're likely facing...

  • Contract renewal risk: service vs price
  • Fleet manager advocacy gap
  • OEM-fitted vs replacement brand confusion
  • Cost-per-km benchmarking disputes
  • Multi-vendor split: loyalty erosion

This will help answer...

  • Vendor preference drivers beyond price
  • Contract renewal switching triggers
  • Fleet segment satisfaction by tyre category
  • Service response vs product quality ranking
  • Advocacy likelihood by fleet size

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete fleet tyre client journey from vendor selection to active advocacy.

TENETS 01

Vendor Selection & Entry

  • First tyre brand approached
  • Tender trigger, fleet renewal cycle
TENETS 02

Preference Drivers

  • Tread life, load rating priority
  • Brand vs. price trade-off
TENETS 03

Product & Fitment

  • SKU availability, fitment lead time
  • Radial vs. bias fitment mix
TENETS 04

Service & Support

  • Roadside assistance response time
  • Dedicated fleet account management
TENETS 05

Pricing & Contract

  • Cost-per-kilometre benchmarking
  • Volume rebate, contract tenure terms
TENETS 06

Retread & Lifecycle

  • Retread utilisation rate, casing return
  • Lifecycle tracking, scrap tyre disposal
TENETS 07

Loyalty & Switching

  • Contract renewal intent, churn triggers
  • Competitor trial, dual-vendor strategy
TENETS 08

Advocacy & Referral

  • Peer referral intent, industry forum activity
  • Vendor co-marketing, case study participation

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the B2B Tyre Fleet Client Satisfaction and Fleet Manager Vendor Advocacy Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Scoring tyre vendor satisfaction across fleet segments
2
Ranking vendor advocacy and switching intent drivers
3
Benchmarking service levels by fleet size and sector
Deliverables
Vendor satisfaction scores
Advocacy driver ranking
Fleet segment benchmarks
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Fleet managers in logistics hubs with low digital access
2
Quick coverage across dispersed regional depot clusters
Deliverables
Regional fleet coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Large national fleet accounts requiring contract-level verification
2
High-value cohorts in mining, construction, or long-haul segments
Deliverables
Cluster-level insights
Vendor relationship maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Messaging feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting fleet managers and procurement leads across commercial vehicle, logistics, and industrial fleet segments.
Consider adding: CATI for depot-based fleet managers in low-digital regions, and F2F interviews for large national accounts where contract tenure and switching risk require deeper verification.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the commercial fleet tyre space.

CASELET 1

Fleet tyre vendor switching triggers & loyalty drivers (India)

CASELET 2

Tyre service channel preference & messaging territories (North India)

Fleet tyre vendor switching triggers & loyalty drivers (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India commercial vehicle tyre brand needed to isolate why long-haul fleet operators and last-mile logistics fleets switched primary tyre vendors at renewal, and which service touchpoints most influenced repeat purchase commitment.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 fleet procurement contacts in 8 cities, capturing vendor shortlist criteria , renewal decision timelines , service failure frequency , and price-versus-uptime trade-off thresholds by fleet size and route type.

DELIVERED

A vendor switching trigger map by fleet segment, a ranked loyalty driver framework separating hygiene factors from differentiating factors, and a pricing corridor showing tolerance limits before switching intent activates.
CASELET 1

Fleet tyre vendor switching triggers & loyalty drivers (India)

CASELET 2

Tyre service channel preference & messaging territories (North India)

Fleet tyre vendor switching triggers & loyalty drivers (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India commercial vehicle tyre brand needed to isolate why long-haul fleet operators and last-mile logistics fleets switched primary tyre vendors at renewal, and which service touchpoints most influenced repeat purchase commitment.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 fleet procurement contacts in 8 cities, capturing vendor shortlist criteria , renewal decision timelines , service failure frequency , and price-versus-uptime trade-off thresholds by fleet size and route type.

DELIVERED

A vendor switching trigger map by fleet segment, a ranked loyalty driver framework separating hygiene factors from differentiating factors, and a pricing corridor showing tolerance limits before switching intent activates.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between light commercial vehicle fleets, heavy goods vehicle fleets and mixed-use fleets?

How will you measure vendor preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full fleet tyre procurement cycle and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our fleet contract retention and renewal rate?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call