CORPORATE TRAVEL & EXPENSE

Business Travel Management & Expense Survey

Understand how corporate travel managers, finance leads, and procurement heads evaluate, compare, and choose travel management platforms, expense policies, and vendor contracts, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, benchmark pricing tiers, and fix retention gaps.

Pan-India sample
Corporate travel teams (Travel & Expense Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Booking friction & drop-offsIdentify where corporate travelers abandon bookings, switch tools, or escalate policy exceptions.
Expense policy & spend benchmarksBenchmark per-trip spend limits, reimbursement cycles, and approval thresholds by company size.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most travel managers don't lose budget control purely on overspending. They lose it due to policy non-compliance, fragmented booking channels, opaque supplier contracts, untracked out-of-policy exceptions, and misaligned reimbursement workflows, none of which fully show up in ERP reports or corporate card statements.

If you are...

  • Corporate travel manager or buyer
  • TMC competing on program value
  • Expense platform or fintech provider
  • CFO or finance controller
  • Procurement or vendor strategy lead

You're likely facing...

  • Policy leakage: booked vs approved
  • TMC vs direct booking tension
  • Expense tools = visibility gap
  • Reimbursement cycle: speed vs control
  • Traveler compliance vs flexibility tradeoff

This will help answer...

  • Booking channel preference drivers
  • Policy breach stage and trigger
  • Segment spend by travel frequency
  • Preferred reimbursement model and timeline
  • TMC switching and renewal triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete corporate traveller journey from trip approval to post-trip reconciliation.

TENETS 01

Policy & Compliance

  • Travel policy enforcement gaps
  • Out-of-policy booking frequency
TENETS 02

Booking & Channels

  • Preferred booking channel mix
  • TMC versus direct platform usage
TENETS 03

Approval Workflows

  • Pre-trip authorisation cycle time
  • Approval bottlenecks by seniority tier
TENETS 04

Expense & Reconciliation

  • Expense report submission lag
  • Receipt capture and audit gaps
TENETS 05

Spend Visibility

  • Real-time travel spend dashboards
  • Category-level budget tracking gaps
TENETS 06

Supplier Negotiations

  • Preferred supplier programme coverage
  • Hotel and airline rate renegotiation cycles
TENETS 07

Traveller Experience

  • Duty of care and safety protocols
  • Traveller satisfaction versus cost trade-offs
TENETS 08

Technology & Adoption

  • Travel tech stack consolidation pressure
  • Employee adoption rates by tool type

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Business Travel Management and Expense Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across travel managers, finance controllers, and procurement leads.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking travel policy compliance and expense leakage drivers.
2
Benchmarking per-trip spend across company size and sector.
3
Comparing TMC, in-house, and self-booking tool adoption rates.
Deliverables
Spend driver ranking
Policy compliance matrix
Tool adoption scorecard
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
SME travel buyers with low digital survey engagement.
2
Quick coverage across multiple industry verticals and geographies.
Deliverables
SME segment coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Large enterprise travel managers with complex multi-market programs.
2
High-frequency traveler cohorts requiring contextual expense verification.
Deliverables
Enterprise journey maps
Cluster spend profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Policy concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting travel managers, finance controllers, and procurement leads across enterprise and mid-market accounts.
Consider adding: CATI for SME travel buyers with low digital engagement, and F2F interviews for large enterprise accounts with complex, multi-market travel programs requiring spend verification.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the business travel and expense management space.

CASELET 1

Corporate travel policy adoption & friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Expense tool switching intent & vendor perception study (Southeast Asia)

Corporate travel policy adoption & friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size travel management company needed to isolate why frequent business travelers and finance controllers diverged on policy compliance behavior , specifically around booking channel preference, out-of-policy spend triggers, and approval workflow friction.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 respondents in six metros, capturing booking channel usage, policy override frequency, approval turnaround time, and reimbursement cycle length by traveler seniority and trip type.

DELIVERED

A friction map by traveler segment , a ranked list of compliance drop-off triggers by booking stage, a policy gap framework by company size, and channel levers to reduce out-of-policy spend concentration.
CASELET 1

Corporate travel policy adoption & friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Expense tool switching intent & vendor perception study (Southeast Asia)

Corporate travel policy adoption & friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size travel management company needed to isolate why frequent business travelers and finance controllers diverged on policy compliance behavior , specifically around booking channel preference, out-of-policy spend triggers, and approval workflow friction.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 respondents in six metros, capturing booking channel usage, policy override frequency, approval turnaround time, and reimbursement cycle length by traveler seniority and trip type.

DELIVERED

A friction map by traveler segment , a ranked list of compliance drop-off triggers by booking stage, a policy gap framework by company size, and channel levers to reduce out-of-policy spend concentration.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between SME travel programs, mid-market travel programs and enterprise travel programs?

How will you measure travel vendor preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full corporate travel and expense journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our corporate account acquisition and retention strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call