AUTO & MOBILITY

Car Subscription vs Ownership Preference Survey

Measure how urban car buyers evaluate, compare, and choose between subscription models and outright ownership on cost, flexibility, and commitment, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix pricing tiers, and convert undecided segments faster.

Pan-India sample
Urban car buyers (Active Purchase Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Conversion friction & drop-offsIdentify where prospective subscribers hesitate, compare plans, or abandon commitment.
Ownership drivers & trade-offsRank cost sensitivity, tenure preference, and flexibility thresholds by segment.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most mobility planners don't lose subscription converts purely on monthly cost. They lose them due to ownership identity, mileage anxiety, unclear exit terms, fleet renewal timing, and residual value assumptions, none of which fully show up in dealership CRM data or vehicle finance application records.

If you are...

  • OEM subscription program lead
  • Fleet and mobility sales head
  • EV strategy or product planner
  • Network development or dealer principal
  • Corporate strategy or portfolio head

You're likely facing...

  • Subscription vs ownership intent gap
  • Drop-offs: tenure flexibility stage
  • Ownership = asset/status perception
  • Subscription = rental/temporary perception
  • Segment fit confusion: urban vs suburban

This will help answer...

  • Preference drivers beyond monthly cost
  • Conversion drop-off stage
  • Segment-level ownership vs subscription split
  • Pricing tolerance and contract length
  • Switching triggers and renewal barriers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete car mobility journey from initial consideration to long-term commitment.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Awareness

  • First touchpoint, channel source
  • Subscription vs ownership trigger
TENETS 02

Preference Drivers

  • Ownership aspiration vs flexibility need
  • Segment, tenure, usage profile
TENETS 03

Pricing & WTP

  • Monthly fee tolerance by segment
  • Bundled cost vs itemised billing
TENETS 04

Product & Servicing

  • Vehicle swap frequency, model range
  • Maintenance SLA, breakdown response
TENETS 05

Journey Friction

  • Onboarding steps, documentation load
  • Drop-off points, reactivation barriers
TENETS 06

Usage & Stickiness

  • Renewal intent, churn triggers
  • Daily mileage, multi-vehicle households
TENETS 07

Trust & Credibility

  • Provider reputation, OEM backing
  • Contract transparency, exit clause clarity
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Subscription vs leasing vs EMI trade-offs
  • Provider shortlist, switching intent

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Car Subscription vs Ownership Preference Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking subscription vs ownership preference by segment
2
Quantifying willingness-to-pay across tenure bands
3
Comparing urban, suburban, and metro driver cohorts
Deliverables
Preference ranking matrix
Segment preference splits
Willingness-to-pay bands
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Older or low-digital car owners in tier-2 cities
2
Quick pulse across multiple regional dealer catchments
Deliverables
Regional coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-income or fleet-adjacent buyers needing in-person verification
2
Dealership forecourt intercepts in priority metro markets
Deliverables
Cohort journey maps
Forecourt intercept data
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to capture low-digital car owners in tier-2 and tier-3 markets.
Consider adding: F2F intercepts at high-footfall dealership forecourts and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test subscription proposition messaging before GTM finalisation.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the personal mobility and vehicle access space.

CASELET 1

EV lease vs purchase intent segmentation among urban commuters (India)

CASELET 2

Subscription model messaging & channel fit for fleet-adjacent buyers (West India)

EV lease vs purchase intent segmentation among urban commuters (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India OEM needed to isolate how urban salaried commuters and self-employed professionals weigh monthly outflow flexibility against long-term asset ownership when considering an electric vehicle, and which segment was more likely to defect to a lease model.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 metros with 480 respondents, capturing total cost of ownership perception , residual value awareness , monthly budget thresholds , and stated preference under 4 simulated financing scenarios for each segment.

DELIVERED

A segment preference map by income band and vehicle use pattern, a pricing corridor for lease entry points by city tier, and a ranked friction list blocking first-time EV lease consideration among self-employed buyers.
CASELET 1

EV lease vs purchase intent segmentation among urban commuters (India)

CASELET 2

Subscription model messaging & channel fit for fleet-adjacent buyers (West India)

EV lease vs purchase intent segmentation among urban commuters (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India OEM needed to isolate how urban salaried commuters and self-employed professionals weigh monthly outflow flexibility against long-term asset ownership when considering an electric vehicle, and which segment was more likely to defect to a lease model.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 metros with 480 respondents, capturing total cost of ownership perception , residual value awareness , monthly budget thresholds , and stated preference under 4 simulated financing scenarios for each segment.

DELIVERED

A segment preference map by income band and vehicle use pattern, a pricing corridor for lease entry points by city tier, and a ranked friction list blocking first-time EV lease consideration among self-employed buyers.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between first-time subscribers, lapsed subscribers and committed owners?

How will you measure subscription versus ownership preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full subscription consideration journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our subscriber acquisition and retention targets?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call