CONSUMER FINANCE & DIGITAL LENDING

Consumer Finance Brand Perception & Digital Lending Preference Survey

Map how retail borrowers evaluate, compare, and choose between lenders across brand trust, product fit, and digital experience, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix conversion drop-offs, and benchmark your positioning against competitors.

Pan-India sample
Retail borrowers (Active loan applicants)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Channel friction & conversion gapsIdentify where borrowers hesitate, stall, or abandon digital lending journeys.
Brand trust & switching triggersBenchmark lender perception scores across segments, tenure, and loan purpose.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most consumer lenders don't lose borrowers purely on interest rates. They lose them due to weak brand recall, misread digital trust signals, poor app-stage drop-off, misaligned product positioning, and fee transparency gaps, none of which fully show up in disbursement reports or NPS dashboards.

If you are...

  • Bank vs fintech brand rivalry
  • NBFC digital lending scale-up
  • Consumer credit product head
  • Digital acquisition and growth lead
  • Retail lending strategy teams

You're likely facing...

  • Brand fit confusion: bank vs app
  • Drop-offs at KYC or offer stage
  • Banks = safe/slow perception
  • Fintechs = fast/risky perception
  • Repeat borrowing and switching gaps

This will help answer...

  • Preference drivers beyond rate
  • Digital journey drop-off stage
  • Bank vs fintech segment split
  • Fee and tenure perception gaps
  • Switching and re-borrowing triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete borrower journey from lender discovery to long-term product loyalty.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Awareness

  • First lender touchpoint, channel source
  • Brand recall across borrower segments
TENETS 02

Preference Drivers

  • Lender selection criteria, ranked priority
  • Trade-offs between rate and speed
TENETS 03

Product & Servicing

  • Loan product fit, tenure flexibility
  • Post-disbursal servicing satisfaction
TENETS 04

Journey Friction

  • Drop-off points, KYC abandonment
  • Documentation burden, re-submission loops
TENETS 05

Pricing & WTP

  • Interest rate sensitivity, fee tolerance
  • Processing charge perception, hidden cost awareness
TENETS 06

Usage & Stickiness

  • Repeat borrowing intent, cross-product uptake
  • App engagement frequency, feature adoption
TENETS 07

Trust & Credibility

  • Data privacy confidence, RBI compliance signals
  • Grievance redressal trust, brand safety perception
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Lender switching triggers, churn intent
  • Perceived differentiation across top fintech brands

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Consumer Finance Brand Perception & Digital Lending Preference Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Measuring brand trust scores across lender categories.
2
Ranking digital lending app preference drivers.
3
Comparing segments by income band and borrower profile.
Deliverables
Brand perception index
Preference driver ranking
Segment gap matrix
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Low-digital borrowers in tier-2 and tier-3 markets.
2
Quick coverage across multiple city clusters.
Deliverables
Tier-wise coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-ticket borrowers requiring identity and intent verification.
2
Capturing local lender trust dynamics in specific geographies.
Deliverables
Cohort trust maps
Rich journey narratives
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and verbatims
Positioning feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI for low-digital borrowers in tier-2 and tier-3 markets.
Consider adding: F2F for high-ticket borrower cohorts and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test brand positioning and digital lending messaging.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the consumer finance and digital lending space.

CASELET 1

Digital lending channel preference & trust signals (India)

CASELET 2

Personal loan brand perception & messaging territories (South India)

Digital lending channel preference & trust signals (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to isolate why salaried millennials and self-employed borrowers chose fintech apps over traditional lenders, and which trust signals and fee transparency cues shifted their shortlisting decisions at the application stage.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 8 cities with 600 respondents, capturing lender shortlist composition, app discovery path, fee sensitivity thresholds, and drop-off triggers at each stage of the digital loan application journey, segmented by income band and employment type.

DELIVERED

A channel preference map by borrower segment, a ranked trust signal inventory showing which cues drove shortlist inclusion, a fee sensitivity corridor by income band, and a drop-off friction list tied to specific application journey stages.
CASELET 1

Digital lending channel preference & trust signals (India)

CASELET 2

Personal loan brand perception & messaging territories (South India)

Digital lending channel preference & trust signals (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to isolate why salaried millennials and self-employed borrowers chose fintech apps over traditional lenders, and which trust signals and fee transparency cues shifted their shortlisting decisions at the application stage.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 8 cities with 600 respondents, capturing lender shortlist composition, app discovery path, fee sensitivity thresholds, and drop-off triggers at each stage of the digital loan application journey, segmented by income band and employment type.

DELIVERED

A channel preference map by borrower segment, a ranked trust signal inventory showing which cues drove shortlist inclusion, a fee sensitivity corridor by income band, and a drop-off friction list tied to specific application journey stages.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between first-time digital borrowers, repeat digital borrowers and multi-lender borrowers?

How will you measure digital lender preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full digital lending journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our digital acquisition and retention messaging?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call