Contractor & Subcontractor Collaboration Survey
Measure how general contractors evaluate, select, and manage subcontractors across bid qualification, scope negotiation, and on-site coordination, so you can sharpen vendor positioning, fix retention gaps, and benchmark your collaboration model against competitors.
CONTEXT & RELEVANCE
Why run this survey now
Most general contractors don't lose subcontractor performance purely on trade skill gaps. They lose it due to misaligned scope handoffs, unclear accountability chains, payment timing friction, communication breakdowns, and subcontractor capacity mismatches, none of which fully show up in project management software or contract compliance logs.
If you are...
- General contractor scaling subcontractor base
- Subcontractor managing multi-GC relationships
- Project delivery or operations head
- Commercial or procurement lead
RESEARCH THEMES
What This Survey Investigates
Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete contractor collaboration journey from subcontractor selection to project closeout.
Selection & Vetting
- Subcontractor qualification criteria
- Pre-bid screening methods
Scope & Contracts
- Scope definition clarity at award
- Contract terms, change order triggers
Scheduling & Coordination
- Pull planning, look-ahead cadence
- Trade sequencing conflicts
Communication & Reporting
- Daily reporting tools, field-to-office flow
- RFI and submittal response lag
Payment & Cash Flow
- Pay application cycle, retainage terms
- Subcontractor cash flow friction points
Safety & Compliance
- Site safety plan enforcement gaps
- OSHA compliance, incident reporting
Quality & Rework
- Punch list volume, rework cost burden
- Inspection cadence, defect ownership
Retention & Rebid
- Subcontractor rebid rates, loyalty drivers
- Post-project performance scoring
SAMPLING STRATEGY
Tell us about your ideal sample
Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.
METHODOLOGY
Survey approach
For the Contractor and Subcontractor Collaboration Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across contractor tiers and project types.
EXECUTION PROCESS
How we execute
A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.
Define the decision frame
Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts
Define the decision frame
Design the instrument
Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)
Design the instrument
Lock the questionnaire
Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version
Lock the questionnaire
Pilot and calibrate
Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed
Pilot and calibrate
Run fieldwork
Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls
Run fieldwork
Assure quality
Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail
Assure quality
Prepare the dataset
Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions
Prepare the dataset
Analyse and synthesise
Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights
Analyse and synthesise
Deliver and align
Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations
Deliver and align
COMMERCIAL TERMS
Request a Commercial Proposal
Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.
Select Sample Size
Geography
Select Mode of Survey
Length of the Interview
$0.00
+ applicable taxes
Cost Breakdown
Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.
REFERENCE CASELETS
Reference
Real-world examples of survey work in the construction contracting space.
Subcontractor selection criteria & trade package preferences (India)
OBJECTIVE
WHAT WE DID
DELIVERED
Subcontractor selection criteria & trade package preferences (India)
On-site coordination friction & communication channel audit (GCC)
Subcontractor selection criteria & trade package preferences (India)
OBJECTIVE
A mid-size general contractor needed to map how project managers and site procurement leads shortlist and award civil, MEP, and finishing trade packages , and which criteria drove repeat engagement versus one-time hire decisions.
WHAT WE DID
Ran a structured quant survey across 180 project managers in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities, capturing trade package allocation logic, bid evaluation criteria, payment term preferences, and frequency of subcontractor churn by project type and contract value band.
DELIVERED
A trade package preference map by project type, a ranked selection criteria framework across five contractor segments, and a churn trigger list identifying the top friction points that displace incumbent subcontractors before project completion.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Common Questions
Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.
What decisions will this survey enable?
Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?
Can we see differences between specialty trade subcontractors, general subcontractors and self-performing contractors?
How will you measure subcontractor selection and retention decisions beyond simple ratings?
Will the survey map the full project collaboration lifecycle and drop-offs?
Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?
How will findings improve our subcontractor network growth and retention strategy?
Still have questions?
Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.