CORPORATE BANKING & FRAUD RISK

Corporate Banking Fraud & Trust Recovery Study

Corporate banking clients evaluate fraud incident severity, recovery responsiveness, and institutional accountability when weighing continued relationships, so you can sharpen retention positioning, fix trust-gap messaging, and benchmark recovery conversion rates.

Pan-India sample
Corporate banking clients (CFOs / Treasury Heads)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Trust erosion & exit signalsIdentify the fraud touchpoints that trigger corporate client defection decisions.
Recovery benchmarks & loyalty thresholdsQuantify resolution timelines, compensation expectations, and re-engagement conditions by segment.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most corporate banking clients don't exit a relationship purely on a fraud incident. They exit due to slow incident response, opaque communication, unresolved liability disputes, inconsistent relationship manager accountability, and perceived institutional indifference, none of which fully show up in churn reports or NPS dashboards.

If you are...

  • Corporate banking fraud response head
  • Institutional trust recovery team
  • Transaction banking product leader
  • Client retention and revenue head
  • Risk and compliance strategy director

You're likely facing...

  • Post-fraud client attrition: silent exits
  • Liability gap: bank vs client perception
  • Response speed vs thoroughness tension
  • Relationship manager credibility erosion
  • Reactivation stall after incident closure

This will help answer...

  • Trust recovery drivers by segment
  • Exit decision stage after incident
  • Liability communication vs retention link
  • Fee and remedy expectation gaps
  • Reactivation and wallet-share triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete corporate client journey from fraud exposure to restored banking trust.

TENETS 01

Fraud Exposure & Impact

  • Fraud incident type, frequency
  • Financial loss, operational disruption
TENETS 02

Detection & Reporting

  • Detection channel, time to discovery
  • Internal escalation, regulatory notification
TENETS 03

Bank Response Quality

  • Resolution speed, case ownership clarity
  • Communication frequency, reimbursement outcome
TENETS 04

Trust Erosion Triggers

  • Confidence drop, relationship reassessment
  • Board-level escalation, mandate review
TENETS 05

Recovery & Remediation

  • Funds recovery rate, timeline
  • Remediation commitments, control upgrades
TENETS 06

Control & Prevention

  • Pre-incident controls, authentication gaps
  • Treasury system integration, alert configuration
TENETS 07

Switching & Retention

  • Mandate redistribution, wallet share shift
  • Retention conditions, competitor evaluation
TENETS 08

Trust Rebuild Signals

  • Confidence restoration milestones, timeline
  • Relationship manager credibility, senior engagement

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Corporate Banking Fraud and Trust Recovery Study, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across corporate banking respondent profiles.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Measuring fraud incident rates by banking segment
2
Ranking trust recovery drivers post-fraud event
3
Comparing responses across treasury, compliance, and finance roles
Deliverables
Driver ranking
Trust recovery index
Segment gap matrix
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Mid-market corporates with limited digital survey participation
2
Quick coverage across multiple regional banking clusters
Deliverables
Regional coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Large corporates with sensitive fraud disclosure requirements
2
High-value relationship banking cohorts needing verification
Deliverables
Cohort trust maps
Verified incident profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Messaging feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting treasury heads, CFOs, and compliance officers across corporate banking segments.
Consider adding: CATI for mid-market corporates with low digital participation, and F2F for high-value relationship banking cohorts where fraud disclosure sensitivity requires in-person verification.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the corporate banking and financial trust space.

CASELET 1

Transaction banking channel preference & friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Credit fraud experience & institutional trust recovery signals (India)

Transaction banking channel preference & friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size private sector lender needed to map how mid-market corporates and large enterprise treasury teams evaluate and switch between primary transaction banking relationships , and which friction points accelerate that switching decision.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 corporate finance and treasury respondents in six cities, capturing relationship tenure, switching triggers, digital platform satisfaction scores, fee sensitivity, and the weight each segment placed on relationship manager responsiveness versus platform capability.

DELIVERED

A segment-level friction list ranked by switching urgency, a channel preference corridor by company size and industry, and a set of retention levers mapped to the specific moments when corporate clients begin evaluating alternative banking relationships.
CASELET 1

Transaction banking channel preference & friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Credit fraud experience & institutional trust recovery signals (India)

Transaction banking channel preference & friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size private sector lender needed to map how mid-market corporates and large enterprise treasury teams evaluate and switch between primary transaction banking relationships , and which friction points accelerate that switching decision.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 corporate finance and treasury respondents in six cities, capturing relationship tenure, switching triggers, digital platform satisfaction scores, fee sensitivity, and the weight each segment placed on relationship manager responsiveness versus platform capability.

DELIVERED

A segment-level friction list ranked by switching urgency, a channel preference corridor by company size and industry, and a set of retention levers mapped to the specific moments when corporate clients begin evaluating alternative banking relationships.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between mid-market corporates, large enterprise clients and public sector entities?

How will you measure fraud response satisfaction beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full fraud response journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our client retention and relationship recovery programme?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call