SME BANKING & FINANCE

Corporate MSME Banking Unmet Need vs DIY Finance Workaround Behaviour Survey

Map how corporate MSME finance heads evaluate formal banking products, navigate unmet credit gaps, and choose DIY workarounds, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix product-market fit gaps, and benchmark conversion across segments.

Pan-India sample
Corporate MSMEs (Finance Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Unmet need & workaround triggersIdentify the exact banking gaps that push MSMEs toward DIY finance alternatives.
Segment risk & product fitDiagnose which MSME segments, revenue bands, and credit profiles reject formal banking products.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most corporate MSME lenders don't lose accounts purely on interest rate. They lose them due to product rigidity, opaque fee structures, slow credit decisions, poor relationship continuity, and unrecognised DIY workarounds, none of which fully show up in loan origination systems or portfolio dashboards.

If you are...

  • Bank competing against NBFC agility
  • NBFC scaling corporate MSME book
  • Credit product head, SME segment
  • Commercial banking distribution lead
  • MSME revenue growth team

You're likely facing...

  • Unmet need vs workaround confusion
  • Drop-offs at credit appraisal stage
  • Banks: trusted but slow perception
  • NBFCs: flexible but costly perception
  • Renewal leakage to informal credit

This will help answer...

  • Unmet need by MSME segment
  • DIY workaround trigger points
  • Bank vs NBFC switching drivers
  • Fee and tenure friction thresholds
  • Retention risk and upsell readiness

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete MSME banking journey from first credit need to long-term product adoption.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Awareness

  • First banking touchpoint, MSME segment
  • Referral vs. digital channel entry
TENETS 02

Preference Drivers

  • Bank selection criteria, working capital
  • RM relationship vs. digital self-service
TENETS 03

Unmet Need Mapping

  • Credit gaps, specific MSME sub-segments
  • Unserved product categories, formal banking
TENETS 04

DIY Workaround Behaviour

  • Self-arranged finance tools, informal channels
  • Workaround frequency, credit product type
TENETS 05

Journey Friction

  • Drop-off points, credit application process
  • Documentation burden, KYC and financials
TENETS 06

Pricing & WTP

  • Interest rate sensitivity, MSME credit products
  • Fee tolerance, processing and renewal charges
TENETS 07

Trust & Switching

  • Bank loyalty triggers, MSME credit tenure
  • Switching barriers, primary lender relationship
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Fintech vs. PSB vs. private bank preference
  • Multi-banking behaviour, credit product split

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Corporate MSME Banking Unmet Need vs DIY Finance Workaround Behaviour Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Mapping unmet need by MSME tier and sector
2
Ranking DIY workaround types by frequency
3
Benchmarking formal credit gaps across regions
Deliverables
Workaround frequency matrix
Unmet need heatmap
Segment gap index
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Micro-enterprise owners with low digital access
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns
Deliverables
Tier-wise coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-turnover MSMEs with complex workaround stacks
2
Clusters where informal credit networks dominate
Deliverables
Cluster workaround profiles
Rich journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Proposition feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, covering micro, small, and mid-market MSME segments across formal and semi-formal banking touchpoints, supported by CATI in low-digital Tier 2 and Tier 3 clusters.
Consider adding: Face-to-face interviews in high-workaround industrial clusters and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test product propositions that could convert DIY finance behaviour into formal banking adoption.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the MSME business banking space.

CASELET 1

MSME credit product gap & segment prioritisation (India)

CASELET 2

SME relationship banking message & channel fit (North India)

MSME credit product gap & segment prioritisation (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to isolate which MSME revenue bands (sub-1 crore, 1 to 5 crore, 5 to 25 crore) were most underserved by existing working capital products , and which product attributes drove shortlisting versus rejection.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 420 MSME finance decision-makers in 6 cities, capturing product shortlisting criteria, collateral tolerance, repayment cycle preferences, and stated reasons for switching away from incumbent lenders within the prior 18 months.

DELIVERED

A segment-level product gap map by revenue band, a ranked attribute priority framework for working capital features, and a switching trigger list identifying the 4 conditions most likely to displace an existing lender relationship.
CASELET 1

MSME credit product gap & segment prioritisation (India)

CASELET 2

SME relationship banking message & channel fit (North India)

MSME credit product gap & segment prioritisation (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to isolate which MSME revenue bands (sub-1 crore, 1 to 5 crore, 5 to 25 crore) were most underserved by existing working capital products , and which product attributes drove shortlisting versus rejection.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 420 MSME finance decision-makers in 6 cities, capturing product shortlisting criteria, collateral tolerance, repayment cycle preferences, and stated reasons for switching away from incumbent lenders within the prior 18 months.

DELIVERED

A segment-level product gap map by revenue band, a ranked attribute priority framework for working capital features, and a switching trigger list identifying the 4 conditions most likely to displace an existing lender relationship.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between micro enterprises, small enterprises and medium enterprises?

How will you measure workaround adoption beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full MSME banking journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our MSME acquisition and retention messaging?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call