CRM & ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE

CRM Software Adoption & Usage Survey

Map how B2B sales and operations teams evaluate, compare, and choose CRM platforms across onboarding complexity, integration fit, and total cost of ownership, so you can sharpen positioning, fix conversion gaps, and benchmark retention against competing solutions.

Pan-India sample
B2B software users (CRM Owners/Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Adoption friction & drop-offsIdentify where sales teams stall, disengage, or abandon CRM onboarding workflows.
Feature value & switching triggersRank must-have capabilities, pricing thresholds, and contract renewal decision signals.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most CRM vendors don't lose accounts purely on feature gaps. They lose them due to low user adoption rates, workflow misalignment, poor onboarding design, integration friction, and unmet role-specific needs, none of which fully show up in license renewal data or helpdesk ticket logs.

If you are...

  • CRM vendor losing renewal deals
  • Product head prioritizing roadmap bets
  • Revenue lead stalling mid-market expansion
  • GTM strategy head benchmarking competitors
  • Customer success lead tracking churn signals

You're likely facing...

  • Adoption drop-off post-onboarding
  • Feature usage vs. perceived value gap
  • SMB vs. enterprise fit confusion
  • Switching triggers: price vs. usability
  • Integration friction slowing sales cycles

This will help answer...

  • Adoption drivers by user segment
  • Drop-off stage in onboarding journey
  • Feature gaps vs. competitor offerings
  • Pricing tolerance across company size
  • Renewal risk and switching triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete CRM user journey from vendor discovery to platform advocacy.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Shortlisting

  • Vendor discovery channels, peer referrals
  • Shortlist criteria, evaluation triggers
TENETS 02

Selection Drivers

  • Feature priorities at point of purchase
  • Integration fit, deployment model preference
TENETS 03

Onboarding & Activation

  • Time-to-activation, setup friction points
  • Training format, admin configuration load
TENETS 04

Adoption & Resistance

  • User adoption rates across sales teams
  • Resistance sources, workaround behaviours
TENETS 05

Feature Utilisation

  • Active vs. dormant module usage
  • Automation depth, reporting frequency
TENETS 06

Pricing & Renewal

  • Seat pricing perception, tier fit
  • Renewal triggers, expansion blockers
TENETS 07

Support & Trust

  • Vendor support responsiveness, SLA gaps
  • Trust signals, account management quality
TENETS 08

Switching & Loyalty

  • Churn intent signals, migration barriers
  • Competitive consideration set at renewal

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the CRM Software Adoption and Usage Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across buyer roles and company sizes.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Measuring CRM adoption rates by company size
2
Ranking feature priorities across user roles
3
Benchmarking switching triggers by industry segment
Deliverables
Feature priority ranking
Adoption gap matrix
Segment comparison cuts
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
SMB owners with low digital survey engagement
2
Quick coverage across tier-2 and tier-3 markets
Deliverables
SMB segment coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Enterprise accounts with complex CRM procurement cycles
2
High-value cohorts requiring workflow context verification
Deliverables
Enterprise journey maps
Cluster-level insights
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to capture SMB owners and decision-makers with low digital survey participation.
Consider adding: F2F interviews for enterprise procurement cohorts and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test onboarding messaging and identify adoption barriers by user role.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the CRM software and sales technology space.

CASELET 1

CRM pricing sensitivity & tier preference among mid-market sales teams (India)

CASELET 2

CRM onboarding friction & adoption drop-off mapping for B2B SaaS teams (India)

CRM pricing sensitivity & tier preference among mid-market sales teams (India)

OBJECTIVE

A sales technology vendor needed to identify how mid-market sales teams across manufacturing and professional services evaluate per-seat pricing versus flat-tier licensing , and which contract terms accelerate or stall renewal decisions.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 280 respondents spanning Sales Operations Managers and Revenue Operations Leads , capturing willingness-to-pay thresholds , contract length preferences , feature-to-price trade-offs, and incumbent switching triggers across six metro markets.

DELIVERED

A pricing corridor by company size band, a feature-value ranking framework mapping must-have versus nice-to-have capabilities, and a switching trigger list segmented by current incumbent relationship and contract tenure.
CASELET 1

CRM pricing sensitivity & tier preference among mid-market sales teams (India)

CASELET 2

CRM onboarding friction & adoption drop-off mapping for B2B SaaS teams (India)

CRM pricing sensitivity & tier preference among mid-market sales teams (India)

OBJECTIVE

A sales technology vendor needed to identify how mid-market sales teams across manufacturing and professional services evaluate per-seat pricing versus flat-tier licensing , and which contract terms accelerate or stall renewal decisions.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 280 respondents spanning Sales Operations Managers and Revenue Operations Leads , capturing willingness-to-pay thresholds , contract length preferences , feature-to-price trade-offs, and incumbent switching triggers across six metro markets.

DELIVERED

A pricing corridor by company size band, a feature-value ranking framework mapping must-have versus nice-to-have capabilities, and a switching trigger list segmented by current incumbent relationship and contract tenure.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between SMB users, mid-market users and enterprise users?

How will you measure CRM platform preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full CRM adoption journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our CRM renewal and expansion revenue?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call