DEFENCE & PROCUREMENT

Defence Vendor Satisfaction vs Repeat Procurement & Contract Extension Rate Survey

Defence procurement officers, contract managers, and vendor relationship leads evaluate, compare, and navigate vendor performance ratings, contract renewal triggers, and satisfaction benchmarks, so you can sharpen vendor selection criteria, reduce contract attrition, and improve repeat award conversion.

Multi-Ministry sample
Defence procurement teams (Contract & Vendor Heads)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Satisfaction gaps & contract drop-offsIdentify where vendor dissatisfaction breaks repeat procurement decisions and extensions.
Performance drivers & renewal signalsBenchmark the satisfaction thresholds that predict contract extension versus replacement.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most defence vendors don't lose repeat contracts purely on delivery performance. They lose them due to unresolved technical support gaps, opaque communication during procurement cycles, misaligned offset commitments, post-delivery service failures, and unquantified relationship equity, none of which fully show up in contract compliance reports or procurement scorecards.

If you are...

  • Prime contractor seeking contract extensions

  • Tier-2 vendor benchmarking satisfaction scores

  • Vendor strategy head, retention focus

  • Business development lead, MoD accounts

  • Programme director managing repeat bids

You're likely facing...

  • Repeat procurement rate: unexplained drop

  • Satisfaction scores vs. extension rate gap

  • Incumbent advantage eroding, no clear signal

  • Offset compliance vs. relationship equity tension

  • Post-delivery service: silent disqualifier

This will help answer...

  • Satisfaction drivers beyond delivery metrics

  • Contract extension trigger points

  • Vendor tier satisfaction differentials

  • Pricing vs. service value trade-offs

  • Switching risk and retention signals

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete defence vendor journey from initial contract award to long-term procurement renewal.

TENETS 01

Vendor Selection Criteria

  • Technical compliance, past performance weight
  • Offset obligations, indigenisation mandates
TENETS 02

Delivery & Compliance

  • Schedule adherence, milestone slippage rate
  • Quality assurance, DGQA inspection outcomes
TENETS 03

Satisfaction Drivers

  • Technical support responsiveness, field service quality
  • Contract management, relationship continuity
TENETS 04

Dissatisfaction & Friction

  • Escalation frequency, unresolved defect rate
  • Contractual disputes, penalty clause triggers
TENETS 05

Repeat Procurement Intent

  • Re-nomination likelihood, RFP re-inclusion rate
  • Procurement committee consensus, internal advocacy
TENETS 06

Contract Extension Rate

  • Extension trigger conditions, amendment frequency
  • Performance-linked renewal clauses, tenure patterns
TENETS 07

Pricing & Value

  • L1 pricing pressure, total cost of ownership
  • Offset value capture, lifecycle cost benchmarks
TENETS 08

Competitive Benchmarking

  • Domestic vs foreign OEM performance comparison
  • Vendor consolidation trends, preferred supplier lists
Request a scope validation call

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Defence Vendor Satisfaction vs Repeat Procurement and Contract Extension Rate Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across defence procurement hierarchies.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Scoring vendor satisfaction across contract lifecycle stages.
2
Ranking repeat procurement drivers by vendor category.
3
Benchmarking contract extension rates by procurement tier.
Deliverables
Satisfaction score matrix
Procurement driver ranking
Contract extension benchmarks
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Defence procurement officers with restricted digital access.
2
Rapid coverage across multiple defence establishment clusters.
Deliverables
Procurement officer coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Strategic vendors holding high-value long-tenure contracts.
2
Sensitive contract renewal segments requiring verified responses.
Deliverables
Vendor relationship maps
Contract renewal narratives
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Criteria validation notes
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting defence procurement officers and vendor account managers across contract tiers, supported by CATI for establishments with restricted digital access.
Consider adding: F2F interviews for strategic high-value vendors approaching contract renewal windows, and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test the informal criteria that drive repeat procurement decisions.
Confirm approach
Request timeline

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the defence procurement and vendor management space.

CASELET 1

Vendor performance scoring & contract renewal intent (India)

CASELET 2

Procurement officer trust & supplier positioning gaps (India)

Vendor performance scoring & contract renewal intent (India)

OBJECTIVE

A defence-sector procurement body needed to quantify how Tier-1 system integrators and Tier-2 component suppliers rated across delivery compliance, technical responsiveness, and post-delivery support , and how those ratings correlated with renewal shortlisting decisions.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 120 procurement officers and contract managers, capturing vendor scorecards, weighted evaluation criteria, contract extension triggers, and the specific performance thresholds that disqualified vendors from repeat consideration in the previous 24 months.

DELIVERED

A vendor performance corridor by supply category, a renewal probability framework tied to 6 scored dimensions, and a ranked disqualification trigger list showing which failure types most reliably ended a vendor relationship before contract expiry.
Talk to Survey Consultant
CASELET 1

Vendor performance scoring & contract renewal intent (India)

CASELET 2

Procurement officer trust & supplier positioning gaps (India)

Vendor performance scoring & contract renewal intent (India)

OBJECTIVE

A defence-sector procurement body needed to quantify how Tier-1 system integrators and Tier-2 component suppliers rated across delivery compliance, technical responsiveness, and post-delivery support , and how those ratings correlated with renewal shortlisting decisions.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 120 procurement officers and contract managers, capturing vendor scorecards, weighted evaluation criteria, contract extension triggers, and the specific performance thresholds that disqualified vendors from repeat consideration in the previous 24 months.

DELIVERED

A vendor performance corridor by supply category, a renewal probability framework tied to 6 scored dimensions, and a ranked disqualification trigger list showing which failure types most reliably ended a vendor relationship before contract expiry.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between platform-level vendors, MRO and sustainment suppliers, and systems integration contractors?

How will you measure procurement renewal intent beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full contract lifecycle and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our contract retention and re-bid win rate?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call