SPECIALTY PHARMA & DIABETES CARE

Diabetes Care & Specialty Pharma Brand Trust & Physician Preference Survey

Map how diabetologists, endocrinologists, and general physicians evaluate, compare, and choose specialty pharma brands across efficacy signals, trust, and formulary fit, so you can sharpen positioning, fix conversion gaps, and benchmark prescriber retention.

Pan-India sample
Physicians (Diabetologists, Endocrinologists, GPs)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Prescriber trust & switching triggersIdentify where brand trust erodes and physicians shift prescribing preference.
Formulary fit & segment benchmarksBenchmark brand recall, formulary priority, and preference rank across specialties.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most diabetes and specialty pharma brands don't lose physician preference purely on clinical efficacy. They lose it due to trust erosion at the rep level, formulary positioning gaps, competing brand messaging, unresolved dosing concerns, and weak patient outcome narratives, none of which fully show up in prescription audit data or sales force activity reports.

If you are...

  • Diabetes portfolio brand lead
  • Specialty pharma vs biosimilar competition
  • Medical affairs or MSL head
  • Commercial or market access lead
  • Pharma GTM or field strategy team

You're likely facing...

  • Script share erosion: no clear cause
  • Trust gap: rep vs clinical evidence
  • Originator vs biosimilar perception split
  • Formulary tier vs preference misalignment
  • Switching triggers at renewal or titration

This will help answer...

  • Physician preference drivers beyond efficacy
  • Trust drop-off stage by specialty
  • Segment split: diabetologist vs GP
  • Pricing and co-pay friction points
  • Brand switching and retention triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete physician prescribing journey from initial brand exposure to sustained formulary preference.

TENETS 01

Brand Awareness & Recall

  • Unaided recall by drug class
  • First-mention brand frequency
TENETS 02

Prescribing Preference Drivers

  • Clinical efficacy vs. tolerability trade-offs
  • Patient adherence as preference signal
TENETS 03

MSL & Detailing Impact

  • MSL visit frequency and quality
  • Detail aid relevance by specialty
TENETS 04

Formulary & Access Friction

  • Prior authorization burden by payer tier
  • Formulary listing gaps, specialty segment
TENETS 05

Pricing & Patient Affordability

  • Out-of-pocket cost as prescribing barrier
  • Patient assistance program awareness
TENETS 06

Digital & Omnichannel Engagement

  • HCP portal usage and content preference
  • Digital touchpoint frequency by channel
TENETS 07

Trust & Brand Credibility

  • Clinical evidence quality as trust anchor
  • Post-market safety communication gaps
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Head-to-head brand rank by molecule class
  • Switch triggers across branded competitors

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Diabetes Care & Specialty Pharma Brand Trust & Physician Preference Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across prescriber segments.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking brand trust across insulin and GLP-1 portfolios
2
Measuring prescriber preference by therapy area and specialty
3
Benchmarking detailing frequency against script conversion
Deliverables
Brand trust rankings
Prescriber preference matrix
Detailing impact scores
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Tier 2 and Tier 3 diabetologists with low digital access
2
Quick pulse across high-prescribing general physician clusters
Deliverables
Prescriber coverage map
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Key opinion leaders and high-volume endocrinologists needing verification
2
Specialty diabetes clinics in priority metro markets
Deliverables
KOL influence maps
Clinic-level journey notes
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and verbatims
Messaging concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting diabetologists, endocrinologists, and general physicians across metro and Tier 2 markets to capture brand trust scores and prescriber preference at scale.
Consider adding: CATI for low-digital prescribers in Tier 3 towns and a focused F2F layer with key opinion leaders to verify switching triggers and validate detailing impact findings.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the diabetes care and specialty pharma space.

CASELET 1

GLP-1 & insulin prescribing preference segmentation among diabetologists (India)

CASELET 2

Specialty rep messaging & detailing effectiveness audit among cardiometabolic physicians (India)

GLP-1 & insulin prescribing preference segmentation among diabetologists (India)

OBJECTIVE

A specialty pharma client needed to map how diabetologists and endocrinologists segment patients for GLP-1 receptor agonists versus basal insulin , and which clinical and commercial factors drive first-line prescribing decisions at the individual physician level.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 diabetologists and endocrinologists in 8 metros and Tier 1 cities, capturing patient profiling criteria, brand shortlists, switching triggers, MR visit frequency, and perceived differentiation across the top 4 molecules in the class.

DELIVERED

A prescriber segmentation framework by prescribing volume and molecule affinity, a brand preference map ranking the top 4 molecules on 9 clinical and commercial attributes, and a switching trigger list ranked by segment and city tier.
CASELET 1

GLP-1 & insulin prescribing preference segmentation among diabetologists (India)

CASELET 2

Specialty rep messaging & detailing effectiveness audit among cardiometabolic physicians (India)

GLP-1 & insulin prescribing preference segmentation among diabetologists (India)

OBJECTIVE

A specialty pharma client needed to map how diabetologists and endocrinologists segment patients for GLP-1 receptor agonists versus basal insulin , and which clinical and commercial factors drive first-line prescribing decisions at the individual physician level.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 diabetologists and endocrinologists in 8 metros and Tier 1 cities, capturing patient profiling criteria, brand shortlists, switching triggers, MR visit frequency, and perceived differentiation across the top 4 molecules in the class.

DELIVERED

A prescriber segmentation framework by prescribing volume and molecule affinity, a brand preference map ranking the top 4 molecules on 9 clinical and commercial attributes, and a switching trigger list ranked by segment and city tier.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between diabetologists, endocrinologists and general physicians?

How will you measure prescribing preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full prescribing journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our brand detailing and formulary pull-through?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call