AUTO & EV RETAIL

E2W Dealer Service Experience & Customer Advocacy Behaviour Survey

Measure how E2W owners evaluate service quality, compare dealership touchpoints, and choose whether to recommend or return, so you can fix retention gaps, sharpen advocacy conversion, and benchmark dealer-level loyalty performance.

Pan-India sample
E2W owners (Post-purchase service users)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Service friction & drop-offsIdentify where E2W owners disengage, escalate, or stop returning post-service.
Advocacy drivers & segmentsRank the service attributes that convert satisfied owners into active referrers.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most E2W brands don't lose repeat buyers purely on vehicle performance. They lose them due to slow service turnaround, untrained technician handling, opaque spare parts pricing, poor complaint resolution, and weak post-service follow-up, none of which fully show up in dealer MIS reports or warranty claim data.

If you are...

  • OEM aftersales network head
  • Dealer principal, E2W franchise
  • EV product planning manager
  • Fleet sales or B2B channel lead
  • Customer retention strategy lead

You're likely facing...

  • Service NPS vs repeat purchase gap
  • Technician trust: OEM vs local
  • Spare parts wait: loyalty breaker
  • First service drop-off pattern
  • Advocacy conversion: silent vs vocal

This will help answer...

  • Service drivers of repeat purchase
  • Drop-off stage in service journey
  • Segment-wise advocacy triggers
  • Pricing tolerance: AMC vs pay-per-visit
  • Switching intent after poor service

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete E2W owner journey from dealership visit to post-service advocacy.

TENETS 01

Service Discovery

  • First service touchpoint channel
  • Booking method, walk-in vs. scheduled
TENETS 02

Drop-off Experience

  • Vehicle check-in process quality
  • Service advisor communication at handover
TENETS 03

Workshop Quality

  • Technician competence, EV-specific repairs
  • Parts availability, genuine vs. aftermarket
TENETS 04

Turnaround & Transparency

  • Promised vs. actual delivery time
  • Mid-service update frequency
TENETS 05

Billing & Value

  • Cost perception, AMC vs. pay-per-visit
  • Invoice clarity, line-item breakdown
TENETS 06

Pickup & Delivery

  • Vehicle condition at collection
  • Post-service walkthrough, technician explanation
TENETS 07

Loyalty & Retention

  • Repeat visit intent, dealer switching triggers
  • Loyalty programme awareness, redemption rate
TENETS 08

Advocacy & Referral

  • Word-of-mouth trigger, peer recommendation rate
  • Online review behaviour, platform preference

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the E2W Dealer Service Experience & Customer Advocacy Behaviour Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Scoring dealer service touchpoints at scale
2
Ranking advocacy drivers by ownership cohort
3
Benchmarking NPS across dealer tiers and cities
Deliverables
Advocacy driver ranking
Dealer scorecard matrix
NPS tier benchmarks
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
E2W owners in Tier 3 and rural markets
2
Quick pulse across multiple dealer catchment zones
Deliverables
Tier coverage report
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Fleet operators and high-mileage commercial E2W users
2
Dealership exit intercepts in high-volume service clusters
Deliverables
Cluster service maps
Fleet owner journey profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Advocacy themes and quotes
Messaging concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting E2W owners across Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities to benchmark dealer service scores and map advocacy behaviour at scale.
Consider adding: CATI for Tier 3 and rural owner segments with low digital access, and F2F intercepts at high-volume service centres to capture fleet operator and repeat-service cohort data.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the electric two-wheeler retail and aftersales space.

CASELET 1

E2W service channel preference & friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

E2W aftersales messaging & dealer positioning audit (West India)

E2W service channel preference & friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India E2W brand needed to isolate why first-year owners and second-year owners diverged sharply on authorised service centre usage versus third-party mechanic preference , and which friction points drove that split.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 14 cities with 480 E2W owners, capturing service visit frequency, wait time tolerance, technician trust scores, parts availability perception, and stated reasons for channel switching after the first scheduled service.

DELIVERED

A channel defection friction list ranked by ownership cohort, a service touchpoint priority map by city tier, and a set of retention levers tied to specific service visit stages where owner confidence dropped most sharply.
CASELET 1

E2W service channel preference & friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

E2W aftersales messaging & dealer positioning audit (West India)

E2W service channel preference & friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India E2W brand needed to isolate why first-year owners and second-year owners diverged sharply on authorised service centre usage versus third-party mechanic preference , and which friction points drove that split.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 14 cities with 480 E2W owners, capturing service visit frequency, wait time tolerance, technician trust scores, parts availability perception, and stated reasons for channel switching after the first scheduled service.

DELIVERED

A channel defection friction list ranked by ownership cohort, a service touchpoint priority map by city tier, and a set of retention levers tied to specific service visit stages where owner confidence dropped most sharply.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between first-time E2W buyers, ICE-to-EV switchers and multi-vehicle fleet owners?

How will you measure dealer service preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full post-purchase service journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our dealer network expansion and retention targets?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call