EDUCATION LENDING & FINANCE

Education Loan Decision & Repayment Survey

Map how student borrowers evaluate lenders, compare interest structures, and navigate repayment terms, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix pricing positioning, and reduce early-stage drop-off in your loan conversion funnel.

Pan-India sample
Student borrowers (Active loan applicants/holders)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Application friction & drop-offsIdentify where borrowers stall, switch lenders, or abandon loan applications.
Repayment behaviour & risk signalsBenchmark repayment stress points, moratorium preferences, and default-risk indicators by segment.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most education lenders don't lose borrowers purely on interest rate. They lose them due to opaque fee structures, misread repayment capacity, co-borrower friction, disbursement delays, and post-graduation income uncertainty, none of which fully show up in credit bureau reports or loan origination system data.

If you are...

  • Bank vs NBFC/fintech lender
  • Education loan product head
  • Retail credit portfolio leader
  • Student lending growth head
  • EdTech or institution partner

You're likely facing...

  • Drop-offs at co-borrower stage
  • Lender fit confusion: bank vs NBFC
  • Banks = safe/slow perception
  • NBFCs = fast/high-cost perception
  • Repayment stress vs early prepayment gap

This will help answer...

  • Lender preference drivers beyond rate
  • Application drop-off stage
  • Borrower segment by institution type
  • Fee and tenure sensitivity
  • Refinance and switching triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete borrower journey from loan awareness to full repayment.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Awareness

  • First information source consulted
  • Lender shortlisting triggers
TENETS 02

Lender Preference

  • Public bank vs. NBFC vs. fintech preference
  • Collateral requirement as selection filter
TENETS 03

Product & Coverage

  • Loan amount vs. actual cost gap
  • Covered vs. uncovered expense categories
TENETS 04

Application Friction

  • Document submission drop-off points
  • Approval timeline vs. admission deadline conflict
TENETS 05

Pricing & WTP

  • Interest rate sensitivity by loan tenure
  • Processing fee tolerance thresholds
TENETS 06

Repayment Behaviour

  • EMI start timing vs. employment status
  • Prepayment frequency and trigger events
TENETS 07

Servicing & Support

  • Relationship manager accessibility post-disbursal
  • Digital self-service vs. branch dependency
TENETS 08

Switching & Advocacy

  • Balance transfer consideration and triggers
  • Referral intent by satisfaction segment

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Education Loan Decision and Repayment Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across borrower segments and repayment stages.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking lender selection criteria by borrower segment
2
Mapping repayment stress triggers and default risk signals
3
Comparing disbursement satisfaction across loan ticket sizes
Deliverables
Lender preference ranking
Repayment stress index
Segment decision matrix
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Borrowers in Tier 3 and Tier 4 towns
2
First-generation loan takers with low digital comfort
Deliverables
Tier-wise borrower coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-ticket borrowers in professional or postgraduate cohorts
2
Borrowers with active restructuring or delinquency histories
Deliverables
Cohort journey maps
Repayment behaviour profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Messaging concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI for Tier 3 and Tier 4 borrowers with limited digital access.
Consider adding: F2F interviews for high-ticket and restructured-loan cohorts, plus a focused FGD layer to sharpen repayment communication and lender positioning.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the education finance and student lending space.

CASELET 1

Student loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

CASELET 2

Education loan repayment stress & restructuring intent study (India)

Student loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to map how first-generation college borrowers and repeat postgraduate applicants shortlist lenders, weigh interest rate versus disbursal speed , and decide between public sector banks and private fintech lenders.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 cities with 480 respondents, capturing lender shortlist composition, channel of first contact, documentation friction points, and co-borrower influence on the final lender selection decision.

DELIVERED

A lender preference map by borrower segment, a ranked friction list across the application journey, and a set of channel levers identifying where digital-first lenders could displace incumbent bank relationships at the shortlisting stage.
CASELET 1

Student loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

CASELET 2

Education loan repayment stress & restructuring intent study (India)

Student loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to map how first-generation college borrowers and repeat postgraduate applicants shortlist lenders, weigh interest rate versus disbursal speed , and decide between public sector banks and private fintech lenders.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 cities with 480 respondents, capturing lender shortlist composition, channel of first contact, documentation friction points, and co-borrower influence on the final lender selection decision.

DELIVERED

A lender preference map by borrower segment, a ranked friction list across the application journey, and a set of channel levers identifying where digital-first lenders could displace incumbent bank relationships at the shortlisting stage.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between public sector bank borrowers, private bank borrowers and NBFC borrowers?

How will you measure loan selection decisions beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full loan application and repayment journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our borrower acquisition and retention performance?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call