AUTO & EV

Electric Scooter Adoption & Battery Concerns Survey

Map how urban two-wheeler buyers evaluate range anxiety, charging infrastructure, and battery replacement costs when choosing electric scooters, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix pricing positioning, and improve segment conversion.

Pan-India sample
Two-wheeler buyers (Intenders & Recent Adopters)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Adoption friction & drop-offsIdentify where intenders stall on battery life, cost, or charging access.
Battery concern segmentationRank battery anxiety triggers by segment, city tier, and usage profile.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most EV scooter brands don't lose buyers purely on sticker price. They lose them due to unresolved range anxiety, battery degradation fears, charging infrastructure gaps, after-sales trust deficits, and unclear total cost of ownership, none of which fully show up in dealership footfall data or web analytics.

If you are...

  • EV scooter OEM product planner
  • Battery technology or BMS lead
  • Network development or dealer principal
  • Fleet sales or B2B mobility head
  • VP corporate strategy, EV segment

You're likely facing...

  • Range claim vs. real-world trust gap
  • Battery safety: perception vs. incident rate
  • ICE-to-EV switcher drop-off stage
  • Charging access: urban vs. semi-urban split
  • Warranty tenure vs. resale value tension

This will help answer...

  • Top adoption drivers by segment
  • Battery concern severity by city tier
  • Switcher vs. first-time buyer profile
  • Acceptable price-to-range trade-off
  • Service trust triggers and switch risk

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete electric scooter buyer journey from initial consideration to long-term ownership.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Triggers

  • First-touch channel, OEM or dealer
  • Purchase trigger events, fuel cost or policy
TENETS 02

Model Preference Drivers

  • Range, speed, and brand shortlist criteria
  • Domestic vs. imported OEM preference
TENETS 03

Battery Anxiety

  • Real-world range vs. certified range gap
  • Fire incident awareness, ownership hesitation
TENETS 04

Charging Infrastructure

  • Home charging setup, grid access barriers
  • Public charging availability, route confidence
TENETS 05

Pricing & Subsidy

  • FAME II, state subsidy impact on final price
  • EMI structure, total cost of ownership perception
TENETS 06

Aftersales & Service

  • Authorised service centre reach, wait times
  • OTA update experience, software fault resolution
TENETS 07

Ownership Satisfaction

  • Daily commute fit, ride quality rating
  • Repurchase intent, brand loyalty signals
TENETS 08

Competitive Switching

  • Switch triggers from petrol to electric segment
  • Cross-brand defection risk, retention barriers

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Electric Scooter Adoption & Battery Concerns Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking battery range and charging anxiety drivers
2
Measuring adoption intent across commuter segments
3
Benchmarking concerns by city tier and usage type
Deliverables
Driver priority ranking
Adoption intent index
Battery concern matrix
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
First-time scooter owners with low digital access
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets
Deliverables
Tier-wise coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Fleet operators and high-mileage daily commuter cohorts
2
Dealership-intercept interviews at point of purchase
Deliverables
Fleet owner profiles
Purchase journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to capture first-time owners and Tier 2 and Tier 3 scooter buyers with limited digital presence.
Consider adding: Face-to-face intercepts at dealerships and fleet depots, plus a focused FGD layer to pressure-test battery messaging and warranty communication angles.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the electric two-wheeler mobility space.

CASELET 1

Two-wheeler charging behaviour & infrastructure gaps (India)

CASELET 2

Scooter brand switching triggers & messaging territories (South India)

Two-wheeler charging behaviour & infrastructure gaps (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India EV component supplier needed to map how urban daily commuters and semi-urban first-time EV buyers make charging decisions, including home charging versus public point reliance and the triggers that stall repeat purchase intent.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 8 cities with 600 respondents, capturing charging frequency, session duration, preferred charging location, downtime tolerance, and willingness to pay for faster charging infrastructure by commuter profile and monthly mileage band.

DELIVERED

A charging behaviour segment framework by commuter type, a ranked infrastructure friction list by city tier, and a pricing corridor for fast-charge subscriptions that a product planning team could pressure-test against current tariff structures.
CASELET 1

Two-wheeler charging behaviour & infrastructure gaps (India)

CASELET 2

Scooter brand switching triggers & messaging territories (South India)

Two-wheeler charging behaviour & infrastructure gaps (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India EV component supplier needed to map how urban daily commuters and semi-urban first-time EV buyers make charging decisions, including home charging versus public point reliance and the triggers that stall repeat purchase intent.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 8 cities with 600 respondents, capturing charging frequency, session duration, preferred charging location, downtime tolerance, and willingness to pay for faster charging infrastructure by commuter profile and monthly mileage band.

DELIVERED

A charging behaviour segment framework by commuter type, a ranked infrastructure friction list by city tier, and a pricing corridor for fast-charge subscriptions that a product planning team could pressure-test against current tariff structures.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between first-time EV buyers, ICE switchers and fleet operators?

How will you measure battery anxiety beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full electric scooter purchase journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our dealer network and channel conversion rates?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call