AUTO & EV

EV Consumer Ownership Experience & Brand Advocacy Behaviour Survey

Map how EV owners evaluate charging reliability, service quality, and total cost of ownership across ownership stages, so you can sharpen retention positioning, fix conversion gaps in conquest segments, and benchmark advocacy drivers by brand.

Pan-India sample
EV owners (Post-purchase, 6+ months)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Ownership friction & drop-off signalsIdentify where EV owners disengage, raise complaints, or consider switching brands.
Advocacy triggers & segment rankRank the ownership factors that convert satisfied buyers into active brand advocates.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most EV brands don't lose owners purely on range or charging speed. They lose them due to unmet service expectations, misaligned ownership cost perceptions, weak dealer touchpoints, poor software update communication, and unresolved range anxiety post-purchase, none of which fully show up in warranty claim data or NPS scores.

If you are...

  • OEM EV product planning team
  • EV brand vs legacy ICE rival
  • Aftersales and service network head
  • Fleet EV adoption lead
  • EV GTM and revenue strategy team

You're likely facing...

  • Advocacy gap: satisfied but silent owners
  • Repeat purchase intent vs actual renewal
  • Service touchpoint vs brand perception mismatch
  • OEM trust: early adopter vs mass segment
  • Referral conversion: low despite high satisfaction scores

This will help answer...

  • Ownership satisfaction drivers by segment
  • Advocacy trigger vs detractor stage
  • Repeat purchase vs switch intent
  • Charging and service cost tolerance
  • Referral behaviour and brand loyalty

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete EV owner journey from purchase decision to brand advocacy.

TENETS 01

Purchase Triggers

  • Primary switch motivators, EV vs ICE
  • First OEM considered, domestic or import
TENETS 02

Pre-Purchase Evaluation

  • Range anxiety vs total cost of ownership
  • Test drive conversion, showroom to booking
TENETS 03

Delivery & Onboarding

  • Delivery timeline vs committed date
  • First-charge setup, home or public
TENETS 04

Charging Experience

  • Home vs public charging split
  • DC fast-charge reliability, urban and highway
TENETS 05

Ownership Satisfaction

  • Real-world range vs claimed range gap
  • Software OTA update frequency and impact
TENETS 06

Aftersales & Service

  • Authorised service centre proximity and wait
  • Battery warranty claim experience
TENETS 07

Brand Loyalty & Repurchase

  • Next-vehicle intent, same OEM or switch
  • Upgrade cycle timing and trigger events
TENETS 08

Advocacy & Referral

  • Active referral behaviour, peer and family
  • Detractor triggers, public complaint channels

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the EV Consumer Ownership Experience & Brand Advocacy Behaviour Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking ownership satisfaction drivers by segment
2
Measuring brand advocacy scores across EV models
3
Comparing early adopters against late-majority owners
Deliverables
Advocacy score ranking
Satisfaction driver matrix
Segment comparison cuts
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Older EV owners with lower digital engagement
2
Reaching fleet and commercial EV operators quickly
Deliverables
Owner coverage report
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Premium EV owners requiring in-depth experience mapping
2
Charging infrastructure touchpoints in specific geographies
Deliverables
Ownership journey maps
Cluster-level insights
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Advocacy themes and quotes
Messaging concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting EV owners across vehicle segments and ownership tenure bands, supported by CATI for fleet operators and lower-digital owner cohorts.
Consider adding: Face-to-face interviews for premium segment owners and high-advocacy clusters, plus FGDs to pressure-test referral triggers and brand communication angles.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the electric vehicle ownership space.

CASELET 1

EV service touchpoint friction & aftersales loyalty (India)

CASELET 2

EV brand switching triggers & messaging territories (South Asia)

EV service touchpoint friction & aftersales loyalty (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India two-wheeler EV brand needed to isolate which aftersales touchpoints drove defection among first-year owners and second-year owners , and how service centre experience shaped repurchase intent across city tiers.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 owners in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities, capturing service visit frequency, wait time perception, technician trust scores, parts availability friction, and net promoter intent segmented by ownership tenure.

DELIVERED

A touchpoint friction map ranked by defection risk, a loyalty driver framework segmented by city tier and ownership year, and a prioritised list of service recovery levers tied to specific journey stages.
CASELET 1

EV service touchpoint friction & aftersales loyalty (India)

CASELET 2

EV brand switching triggers & messaging territories (South Asia)

EV service touchpoint friction & aftersales loyalty (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India two-wheeler EV brand needed to isolate which aftersales touchpoints drove defection among first-year owners and second-year owners , and how service centre experience shaped repurchase intent across city tiers.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 owners in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities, capturing service visit frequency, wait time perception, technician trust scores, parts availability friction, and net promoter intent segmented by ownership tenure.

DELIVERED

A touchpoint friction map ranked by defection risk, a loyalty driver framework segmented by city tier and ownership year, and a prioritised list of service recovery levers tied to specific journey stages.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between early adopters, mainstream buyers and fleet operators?

How will you measure brand advocacy beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full EV ownership journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our aftersales and retention revenue?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call