FOOD DELIVERY & PLATFORMS

Food Delivery App Preference & Restaurant Discovery Survey

Map how urban food delivery users evaluate app interfaces, compare restaurant options, and choose between platforms, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix retention drop-offs, and benchmark your positioning against competing apps.

Pan-India sample
Food delivery users (Active Weekly Orderers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Discovery friction & drop-offsIdentify where users abandon restaurant browsing, filter selection, or checkout stages.
Platform switching & loyalty signalsDiagnose which pricing, delivery speed, or cuisine gaps drive app switching.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most food delivery platforms don't lose active users purely on delivery speed. They lose them due to weak restaurant discovery, irrelevant curation, opaque fee structures, poor reorder prompts, and misaligned cuisine recommendations, none of which fully show up in session analytics or order completion dashboards.

If you are...

  • Food delivery platform, growth stage
  • Restaurant aggregator, tier-2 expansion
  • Category or menu strategy lead
  • Retention and lifecycle marketing head
  • Restaurant partner acquisition team

You're likely facing...

  • Discovery drop-off: search vs browse
  • Platform switching on fee perception
  • New restaurant visibility gap
  • Reorder rate below category benchmark
  • Cuisine fit: local vs chain preference

This will help answer...

  • Primary app selection drivers
  • Discovery funnel drop-off stage
  • Segment preference by cuisine type
  • Fee sensitivity vs delivery speed
  • Switching triggers and loyalty signals

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete food delivery journey from app discovery to repeat ordering.

TENETS 01

App Discovery & Adoption

  • First-install trigger channels
  • Peer referral vs. paid acquisition
TENETS 02

Restaurant Discovery

  • In-app browse vs. search intent
  • Cuisine filters, ratings, curation
TENETS 03

Platform Preference Drivers

  • Primary app loyalty triggers
  • Multi-app switching frequency
TENETS 04

Pricing & Fee Sensitivity

  • Delivery fee tolerance thresholds
  • Surge pricing abandonment rates
TENETS 05

Order Journey Friction

  • Checkout drop-off triggers
  • Payment failure, address errors
TENETS 06

Loyalty & Retention

  • Subscription plan uptake drivers
  • Reward redemption vs. churn risk
TENETS 07

Trust & Ratings

  • Review credibility, fake rating concern
  • Food safety, hygiene badge reliance
TENETS 08

Competitive Switching

  • Rival app trial triggers
  • Win-back offer effectiveness

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Food Delivery App Preference and Restaurant Discovery Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking app preference drivers across user segments.
2
Measuring restaurant discovery channel attribution.
3
Comparing order frequency by cuisine type and city tier.
Deliverables
App preference ranking
Discovery channel matrix
Segment frequency bands
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Occasional users with low app engagement habits.
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities.
Deliverables
Tier-wise user coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-frequency power users requiring in-depth order journey mapping.
2
Restaurant owners assessing delivery platform listing decisions.
Deliverables
Power user profiles
Restaurant journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting active food delivery app users across metro and Tier 2 cities, supported by CATI for low-engagement and infrequent user segments.
Consider adding: Face-to-face interviews for high-frequency power users and restaurant partners, plus a focused FGD layer to pressure-test app switching triggers and promotional messaging.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the food delivery and restaurant discovery space.

CASELET 1

Restaurant listing visibility & cuisine preference mapping (Urban India)

CASELET 2

Delivery platform messaging & reorder friction audit (Tier 2 Cities)

Restaurant listing visibility & cuisine preference mapping (Urban India)

OBJECTIVE

A quick-service restaurant chain needed to identify how frequent app-based orderers and occasional dine-in converters shortlist restaurants, and which listing attributes drive first-order selection versus repeat ordering behaviour.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 metros with 480 respondents, capturing cuisine preference rank, listing cue hierarchy, rating threshold, delivery time sensitivity, and platform switching triggers by order frequency segment.

DELIVERED

A cuisine-by-segment preference map , ranked listing attribute framework by orderer type, and a set of platform switching levers tied to specific listing gaps that suppress first-order conversion.
CASELET 1

Restaurant listing visibility & cuisine preference mapping (Urban India)

CASELET 2

Delivery platform messaging & reorder friction audit (Tier 2 Cities)

Restaurant listing visibility & cuisine preference mapping (Urban India)

OBJECTIVE

A quick-service restaurant chain needed to identify how frequent app-based orderers and occasional dine-in converters shortlist restaurants, and which listing attributes drive first-order selection versus repeat ordering behaviour.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 metros with 480 respondents, capturing cuisine preference rank, listing cue hierarchy, rating threshold, delivery time sensitivity, and platform switching triggers by order frequency segment.

DELIVERED

A cuisine-by-segment preference map , ranked listing attribute framework by orderer type, and a set of platform switching levers tied to specific listing gaps that suppress first-order conversion.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between casual orderers, frequent subscribers and lapsed users?

How will you measure app preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full restaurant discovery journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our restaurant partner acquisition and retention strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call