GROCERY & RETAIL

Grocery Store Format Preference Survey

Measure how urban and suburban shoppers evaluate, compare, and choose between hypermarkets, neighbourhood stores, and quick-commerce platforms, so you can sharpen format positioning, convert high-intent segments, and refine channel acquisition strategy.

Pan-India sample
Primary grocery shoppers (Household Purchase Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Format switching & conversion gapsIdentify where shoppers abandon a preferred format and shift channels mid-journey.
Selection drivers & price sensitivityRank proximity, assortment depth, pricing, and speed against each format type.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most grocery retailers don't lose shoppers purely on price or proximity. They lose them due to format mismatch, assortment gaps, private label distrust, checkout friction, and shifting trip-mission patterns, none of which fully show up in loyalty card data or basket-size reports.

If you are...

  • Supermarket format strategy lead
  • Discount vs full-line operator
  • Category or assortment planning head
  • Retail commercial or pricing director
  • Convenience or proximity format team

You're likely facing...

  • Format choice: proximity vs full-range
  • Trip mission split: stock-up vs top-up
  • Discount formats eroding main-shop loyalty
  • Private label trust gap by format
  • Online vs in-store switching pressure

This will help answer...

  • Format preference drivers by segment
  • Trip mission to format mapping
  • Switching triggers across store types
  • Price vs range trade-off threshold
  • Loyalty retention by format type

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete shopper journey from format discovery to repeat store loyalty.

TENETS 01

Format Discovery

  • First store format encountered
  • Discovery channel, referral source
TENETS 02

Format Preference

  • Primary format, visit frequency
  • Occasion-based format switching
TENETS 03

Selection Drivers

  • Price, proximity, assortment weight
  • Trade-off ranking across formats
TENETS 04

In-Store Experience

  • Navigation ease, checkout speed
  • Staff interaction, shelf availability
TENETS 05

Pricing & Value

  • Price sensitivity, promotion response
  • Private label vs. branded trade-off
TENETS 06

Digital & Omnichannel

  • App usage, click-and-collect adoption
  • Online-to-offline switching triggers
TENETS 07

Loyalty & Retention

  • Loyalty scheme membership, redemption rate
  • Defection triggers, win-back barriers
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Format gap perception, unmet needs
  • Switching intent, consideration set size

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Grocery Store Format Preference Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across shopper segments and store formats.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking format preference by shopper mission type.
2
Measuring switching triggers across store formats.
3
Comparing segments by geography, basket size, and frequency.
Deliverables
Format preference ranking
Switching trigger matrix
Segment comparison cuts
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Older or low-digital shoppers in Tier 2 towns.
2
Quick coverage across dispersed residential catchments.
Deliverables
Tier 2 shopper data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-frequency shoppers requiring in-store intercept validation.
2
Catchment-level mapping of format loyalty patterns.
Deliverables
Catchment zone insights
In-store journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and verbatims
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI for low-digital and Tier 2 shopper segments where panel reach is limited.
Consider adding: F2F intercepts at high-footfall store formats for loyalty validation, and a focused FGD layer to sharpen format positioning and private label messaging.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the grocery retail space.

CASELET 1

Private label vs. national brand switching triggers (Urban India)

CASELET 2

Hyperlocal kirana vs. modern trade channel preference (Tier 2 India)

Private label vs. national brand switching triggers (Urban India)

OBJECTIVE

Identify what drives urban grocery shoppers to switch between private label and national branded products across staples and packaged foods, and map how price sensitivity and perceived quality shift by household income tier.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 metros with 480 primary grocery decision-makers, capturing category-level switching triggers, basket composition, price thresholds, quality perception scores, and repeat purchase intent by product segment and income band.

DELIVERED

A switching trigger map by category and income tier, a price threshold corridor for private label entry, and a ranked quality perception framework identifying the categories most vulnerable to brand displacement.
CASELET 1

Private label vs. national brand switching triggers (Urban India)

CASELET 2

Hyperlocal kirana vs. modern trade channel preference (Tier 2 India)

Private label vs. national brand switching triggers (Urban India)

OBJECTIVE

Identify what drives urban grocery shoppers to switch between private label and national branded products across staples and packaged foods, and map how price sensitivity and perceived quality shift by household income tier.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 metros with 480 primary grocery decision-makers, capturing category-level switching triggers, basket composition, price thresholds, quality perception scores, and repeat purchase intent by product segment and income band.

DELIVERED

A switching trigger map by category and income tier, a price threshold corridor for private label entry, and a ranked quality perception framework identifying the categories most vulnerable to brand displacement.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between hypermarket shoppers, convenience store shoppers and online grocery shoppers?

How will you measure store format preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full grocery shopping journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our category and store expansion planning?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call