HEALTH INSURANCE & ADVISORY

Health Insurance Agent Consumer Advisory & Competing Policy Narrative Survey

Map how health insurance buyers evaluate agent recommendations, compare competing policy narratives, and choose coverage tiers, so you can sharpen acquisition messaging, fix retention gaps, and benchmark your policy positioning against rivals.

Pan-India sample
Health insurance buyers (Active Policy Seekers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Advisory friction & conversion drop-offsIdentify where buyers disengage from agent narratives before committing to a policy.
Policy narrative & positioning gapsBenchmark competing coverage narratives across premium tiers, riders, and claim trust signals.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most health insurance agents don't lose policyholders purely on premium cost. They lose them due to competing policy narratives, misread coverage priorities, trust erosion at renewal, advisor script gaps, and carrier perception mismatches, none of which fully show up in policy lapse reports or CRM activity logs.

If you are...

  • Carrier vs broker channel conflict
  • Independent agent, multi-insurer portfolio
  • Product or benefits design lead
  • Distribution or channel growth head
  • Retention and renewal strategy team

You're likely facing...

  • Renewal drop-off: coverage vs cost
  • Competing carrier narrative confusion
  • Agent script misalignment at pitch
  • Premium sensitivity vs benefit gap
  • Switchers: service vs policy fit

This will help answer...

  • Advisory trust drivers by segment
  • Renewal drop-off stage and trigger
  • Carrier narrative preference by profile
  • Premium tolerance vs coverage priority
  • Switching signals before lapse decision

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete policyholder journey from agent-first contact to renewal commitment.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Reach

  • First agent contact channel
  • Referral vs. cold outreach split
TENETS 02

Advisory Quality

  • Needs assessment depth, coverage gaps
  • Policy explanation clarity, jargon load
TENETS 03

Policy Comparison

  • Competing insurer plans presented
  • Feature trade-off framing by agent
TENETS 04

Purchase Friction

  • Documentation bottlenecks, KYC delays
  • Drop-off triggers before policy issuance
TENETS 05

Pricing & WTP

  • Premium sensitivity by coverage tier
  • Willingness to pay for add-on riders
TENETS 06

Claims & Servicing

  • Agent involvement during cashless claims
  • Post-issuance servicing touchpoints
TENETS 07

Trust & Switching

  • Agent credibility signals, license awareness
  • Switching triggers at renewal window
TENETS 08

Competitive Narrative

  • Insurer brand recall, agent-attributed preference
  • Aggregator vs. agent channel perception

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Health Insurance Agent Consumer Advisory and Competing Policy Narrative Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking competing policy narratives by persuasion score
2
Measuring agent advisory influence on plan selection
3
Comparing segments by age, income, and coverage tier
Deliverables
Narrative ranking matrix
Advisory influence scores
Segment preference map
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Policyholders with low digital comfort or access
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns
Deliverables
Geographic coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-premium policyholders requiring in-depth verification
2
Agent-client interaction contexts needing direct observation
Deliverables
Agent advisory maps
High-value cohort profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Narrative themes
Advisory language audit
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to capture policyholders in low-digital Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets where agent advisory influence is highest.
Consider adding: FGDs with a targeted sample of agents and recent policyholders to isolate competing policy narratives and sharpen the messaging framework before final reporting.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the health insurance distribution space.

CASELET 1

Policyholder trust & renewal intent mapping in group health (India)

CASELET 2

Agent advisory credibility & competing narrative audit (South India)

Policyholder trust & renewal intent mapping in group health (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size health insurer needed to quantify how individual retail policyholders and SME group plan subscribers weighed renewal intent , claim experience , and premium sensitivity against competing insurer offers at the point of annual renewal.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing renewal decision triggers , competing policy shortlists , premium tolerance thresholds , and the specific claim touchpoints that shifted or reinforced loyalty in the 90 days before renewal.

DELIVERED

A segment-level renewal intent map , a ranked friction list by claim stage , a premium corridor by policyholder segment, and a set of retention levers tied to specific service moments in the pre-renewal window.
CASELET 1

Policyholder trust & renewal intent mapping in group health (India)

CASELET 2

Agent advisory credibility & competing narrative audit (South India)

Policyholder trust & renewal intent mapping in group health (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size health insurer needed to quantify how individual retail policyholders and SME group plan subscribers weighed renewal intent , claim experience , and premium sensitivity against competing insurer offers at the point of annual renewal.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing renewal decision triggers , competing policy shortlists , premium tolerance thresholds , and the specific claim touchpoints that shifted or reinforced loyalty in the 90 days before renewal.

DELIVERED

A segment-level renewal intent map , a ranked friction list by claim stage , a premium corridor by policyholder segment, and a set of retention levers tied to specific service moments in the pre-renewal window.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between first-time buyers, renewal policyholders and lapsed policyholders?

How will you measure policy preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full policy consideration journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our agent training and policy communication strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call