HOME BUYING & FINANCE

Home Buying Financing Journey & Bank Selection Survey

Map how first-time and repeat home buyers evaluate loan products, compare lenders, and choose between banks and housing finance companies, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, refine product positioning, and improve conversion at each financing stage.

Pan-India sample
Home buyers (Active loan applicants)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Lender selection & drop-offsIdentify where home loan applicants stall, switch lenders, or abandon disbursement.
Rate sensitivity & trade-offsBenchmark interest rate thresholds, processing fee tolerance, and tenure preferences by segment.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most retail banks don't lose home loan applicants purely on interest rates. They lose them due to opaque approval timelines, misaligned product positioning, weak digital touchpoints, poor branch-level guidance, and disconnected post-sanction communication, none of which fully show up in loan origination reports or branch conversion dashboards.

If you are...

  • Bank competing against HFCs
  • HFC repositioning on speed
  • Home loan product head
  • Retail lending distribution head
  • Mortgage growth strategy lead

You're likely facing...

  • Bank vs HFC fit confusion
  • Drop-offs at sanction stage
  • Banks = safe but slow perception
  • HFCs = flexible but costly perception
  • Disbursed borrower switching risk

This will help answer...

  • Bank selection drivers beyond rate
  • Journey drop-off stage
  • Bank vs HFC segment fit
  • Fee and tenure perception gaps
  • Refinance and switching triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete home financing journey from property shortlisting to loan closure.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Triggers

  • Purchase trigger, life-stage event
  • First financing touchpoint reached
TENETS 02

Lender Consideration

  • Lenders shortlisted, evaluation criteria
  • Bank vs. HFC vs. NBFC preference
TENETS 03

Bank Selection

  • Final lender choice, switching point
  • Relationship banking vs. rate shopping
TENETS 04

Application & Documentation

  • Document burden, submission channel
  • Sanction timeline, follow-up frequency
TENETS 05

Pricing & Trade-offs

  • Rate sensitivity, fee tolerance
  • Fixed vs. floating rate preference
TENETS 06

Servicing & Experience

  • Post-disbursement service quality
  • Digital self-service vs. RM contact
TENETS 07

Trust & Advocacy

  • Lender trust signals, brand credibility
  • Referral intent, complaint history
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Lenders rejected, rejection reasons
  • Awareness of competing offers

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Home Buying Financing Journey & Bank Selection Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking bank selection drivers among home loan applicants
2
Mapping financing stage drop-offs and lender switches
3
Comparing segments by loan ticket, city tier, and buyer profile
Deliverables
Bank selection scorecard
Journey stage funnel
Segment preference matrix
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
First-time buyers with low digital engagement
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities
Deliverables
Tier-wise coverage report
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-ticket borrowers requiring in-person verification
2
Buyers navigating complex co-applicant or NRI financing structures
Deliverables
High-value borrower profiles
Rich journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and verbatims
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to cover first-time buyers and Tier 2 and Tier 3 city respondents with low digital access.
Consider adding: Face-to-face interviews for high-ticket and NRI borrower segments, plus a focused FGD layer to sharpen lender messaging and product positioning.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the home financing and bank selection space.

CASELET 1

Home loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

CASELET 2

Mortgage product feature trade-offs & pricing corridor study (India)

Home loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first housing finance company needed to map how first-time homebuyers and upgrade buyers shortlist lenders, weigh DSA referrals against direct bank outreach , and decide where to submit their first application.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 8 cities with 420 respondents, capturing lender shortlist size, channel of first contact, documentation friction, turnaround time perception, and stated reasons for eliminating lenders before final submission.

DELIVERED

A channel influence map by buyer segment, a ranked friction list at each shortlisting stage, and a set of conversion levers identifying where applicants disengage from a lender before the sanction stage.
CASELET 1

Home loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

CASELET 2

Mortgage product feature trade-offs & pricing corridor study (India)

Home loan channel preference & lender shortlisting behaviour (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first housing finance company needed to map how first-time homebuyers and upgrade buyers shortlist lenders, weigh DSA referrals against direct bank outreach , and decide where to submit their first application.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 8 cities with 420 respondents, capturing lender shortlist size, channel of first contact, documentation friction, turnaround time perception, and stated reasons for eliminating lenders before final submission.

DELIVERED

A channel influence map by buyer segment, a ranked friction list at each shortlisting stage, and a set of conversion levers identifying where applicants disengage from a lender before the sanction stage.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between first-time home buyers, repeat buyers and investor purchasers?

How will you measure home loan bank selection beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full home financing journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our home loan acquisition and retention strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call