HEALTHCARE REAL ESTATE

Hospital Real Estate & Infrastructure Brand Trust & Developer Preference Survey

Map how hospital groups, healthcare operators, and trust procurement committees evaluate, compare, and choose real estate developers for clinical infrastructure, so you can sharpen positioning, convert high-value mandates, and benchmark preference across developer tiers.

Pan-India sample
Hospital infrastructure decision-makers (CFOs, Estate Heads)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Developer trust & conversion gapsIdentify where hospital procurement teams hesitate, stall, or switch developers mid-mandate.
Preference drivers & segment rankingBenchmark developer attributes across hospital group size, ownership type, and geography.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most hospital real estate developers don't lose mandates purely on location or price. They lose them due to unclear brand positioning, misread clinical adjacency requirements, trust gaps with hospital operators, weak track records on regulatory compliance, and poor visibility into procurement decision hierarchies, none of which fully show up in site feasibility reports or broker pipeline data.

If you are...

  • Hospital infrastructure developer or REIT

  • Medical campus project head

  • Healthcare asset leasing lead

  • Hospital network expansion strategist

  • Healthcare facility investment director

You're likely facing...

  • Developer trust gap: operators vs investors

  • Brand confusion: specialist vs general build

  • Shortlist drop-off at compliance stage

  • Operators = cautious/slow preference signals

  • Mandate loss: unclear clinical fit criteria

This will help answer...

  • Developer preference drivers beyond cost

  • Shortlist drop-off stage and trigger

  • Segment split: private vs trust hospitals

  • Lease vs ownership commercial tension

  • Renewal and re-engagement switching signals

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete hospital real estate journey from site identification to long-term occupancy.

TENETS 01

Developer Discovery

  • First developer contact channels
  • Referral vs. direct outreach
TENETS 02

Preference Drivers

  • Developer selection criteria ranked
  • Healthcare-specific build credentials
TENETS 03

Brand Trust

  • Developer reputation signals
  • Trust-building touchpoints
TENETS 04

Site & Compliance

  • Zoning and land-use clearances
  • Regulatory handover expectations
TENETS 05

Pricing & Contracts

  • Cost escalation clause tolerance
  • Payment structure preferences
TENETS 06

Delivery & Handover

  • Snag resolution timelines
  • Operational readiness handover criteria
TENETS 07

Post-Occupancy & Support

  • AMC and facility management expectations
  • Developer responsiveness post-commissioning
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Developer shortlist composition
  • Switching triggers and loyalty barriers
Request a scope validation call

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Hospital Real Estate & Infrastructure Brand Trust & Developer Preference Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking developer trust across hospital infrastructure segments
2
Benchmarking brand preference by hospital type and bed capacity
3
Mapping procurement criteria across acquisition and lease decisions
Deliverables
Developer preference ranking
Trust driver matrix
Segment preference bands
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Hospital administrators with low digital survey engagement
2
Rapid coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities
Deliverables
Regional coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Large hospital groups evaluating multi-site infrastructure deals
2
High-value cohorts requiring on-site facility assessment context
Deliverables
Cluster site insights
Decision journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and verbatims
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting hospital infrastructure decision-makers across private hospital groups, trust-run networks, and healthcare REITs.
Consider adding: CATI for Tier 2 and Tier 3 hospital administrators with low digital engagement, and F2F interviews for large hospital groups actively evaluating multi-site developer partnerships.
Confirm approach
Request timeline

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the hospital real estate and infrastructure space.

CASELET 1

Healthcare facility developer trust & site selection criteria (India)

CASELET 2

Medical infrastructure brand messaging & positioning audit (West India)

Healthcare facility developer trust & site selection criteria (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size healthcare infrastructure developer needed to map how hospital procurement heads and facility planning directors shortlist developers, weighting brand credibility , delivery track record , and compliance assurance against price across Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 120 respondents in hospital procurement and infrastructure planning roles, capturing developer shortlisting criteria , trust signal hierarchy , past project satisfaction scores , and deal-breaker thresholds by hospital type and bed capacity.

DELIVERED

A developer preference map ranked by trust signal weight, a segment framework separating private chain hospitals from standalone facilities, and a friction list identifying the 4 criteria most likely to eliminate a developer from the shortlist.
Talk to Survey Consultant
CASELET 1

Healthcare facility developer trust & site selection criteria (India)

CASELET 2

Medical infrastructure brand messaging & positioning audit (West India)

Healthcare facility developer trust & site selection criteria (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size healthcare infrastructure developer needed to map how hospital procurement heads and facility planning directors shortlist developers, weighting brand credibility , delivery track record , and compliance assurance against price across Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 120 respondents in hospital procurement and infrastructure planning roles, capturing developer shortlisting criteria , trust signal hierarchy , past project satisfaction scores , and deal-breaker thresholds by hospital type and bed capacity.

DELIVERED

A developer preference map ranked by trust signal weight, a segment framework separating private chain hospitals from standalone facilities, and a friction list identifying the 4 criteria most likely to eliminate a developer from the shortlist.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between greenfield hospital developers, brownfield redevelopment specialists and medical campus operators?

How will you measure developer preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full hospital infrastructure procurement journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our developer mandate conversion rate?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call