IT CHANNEL & CPAAS

IT Channel Partner & VAR CPaaS OEM Support Gap & End-Client Advisory Survey

Channel partners and VARs evaluate, compare, and navigate CPaaS OEM support tiers, advisory responsiveness, and end-client escalation handling, so you can fix retention gaps, sharpen partner positioning, and convert at-risk accounts.

Multi-Market sample
IT Channel Partners & VARs (Partner Principals, CPaaS Practice Leads)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
OEM support gaps & conversion frictionIdentify where partner deal cycles stall due to unresolved OEM support failures.
End-client advisory benchmarks & drop-off signalsMap advisory quality gaps across CPaaS tiers that accelerate end-client churn.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most IT channel partners and VARs don't lose CPaaS deals purely on price. They lose them due to OEM enablement gaps, unclear tier incentives, misaligned end-client advisory positioning, weak pre-sales support, and inconsistent SLA commitments, none of which fully show up in deal registration logs or CRM pipeline reports.

If you are...

  • CPaaS OEM channel program lead
  • VAR competing on solution depth
  • Channel sales or revenue head
  • Partner enablement or training lead
  • End-client advisory or pre-sales head

You're likely facing...

  • OEM support gaps: pre-sales vs post-sale
  • VAR tier confusion: incentive vs effort
  • CPaaS = complex/underenabled perception
  • End-client advisory: credibility vs margin
  • Deal loss: support gaps, not pricing

This will help answer...

  • OEM support gap by tier
  • Advisory drop-off stage
  • VAR segment preference drivers
  • Incentive structure vs retention
  • End-client switching triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete channel partner journey from OEM onboarding to end-client advisory.

TENETS 01

OEM Discovery & Selection

  • First CPaaS OEM approached
  • Partner program awareness triggers
TENETS 02

Onboarding & Enablement

  • Time-to-first-deal post-certification
  • Enablement resource gaps
TENETS 03

Support Gap Mapping

  • Pre-sales technical support coverage
  • Escalation response time gaps
TENETS 04

End-Client Advisory

  • VAR advisory depth by segment
  • Client-facing CPaaS positioning gaps
TENETS 05

Margin & Incentives

  • Reseller margin structure by tier
  • Deal registration and rebate friction
TENETS 06

Co-Sell Friction

  • OEM direct conflict frequency
  • Joint pipeline visibility gaps
TENETS 07

OEM Loyalty & Switching

  • Multi-OEM portfolio rationale
  • Switching triggers and barriers
TENETS 08

Practice Growth Priorities

  • CPaaS revenue share of total practice
  • Headcount and certification investment plans

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the IT Channel Partner & VAR CPaaS OEM Support Gap & End-Client Advisory Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking OEM support gaps by partner tier
2
Measuring end-client advisory influence on CPaaS selection
3
Benchmarking VAR satisfaction across CPaaS vendors
Deliverables
Support gap matrix
VAR satisfaction scores
Advisory influence ranking
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Smaller VARs with low survey panel presence
2
Quick coverage across regional channel clusters
Deliverables
Regional VAR coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Platinum or gold tier partners needing deeper verification
2
End-client accounts with complex CPaaS deployment contexts
Deliverables
Partner journey maps
Cluster-level insights
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Program concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting channel partners and VARs via vendor partner portals and industry panels to capture support gap and advisory influence data at scale.
Consider adding: CATI for smaller regional VARs with low digital panel presence, and F2F interviews for platinum-tier partners and strategic end-client accounts where CPaaS deployment complexity warrants deeper verification.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the IT channel and CPaaS distribution space.

CASELET 1

CPaaS reseller tier segmentation & pricing corridor study (India)

CASELET 2

VAR-to-end-client advisory gap & messaging territory audit (Southeast Asia)

CPaaS reseller tier segmentation & pricing corridor study (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size CPaaS platform needed to identify how Tier-1 VARs , regional system integrators , and independent resellers evaluated vendor margin structures, and which pricing levers drove partner commitment versus defection to competing OEMs.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 channel partners in 6 metros, capturing margin floor expectations , deal registration compliance , co-sell frequency , and ranked preference scores across 4 competing CPaaS vendor programs.

DELIVERED

A partner-tier pricing corridor by reseller type, a ranked program attribute preference map , and a defection risk framework identifying the specific margin thresholds and support gaps that pushed partners toward competing vendor programs.
CASELET 1

CPaaS reseller tier segmentation & pricing corridor study (India)

CASELET 2

VAR-to-end-client advisory gap & messaging territory audit (Southeast Asia)

CPaaS reseller tier segmentation & pricing corridor study (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size CPaaS platform needed to identify how Tier-1 VARs , regional system integrators , and independent resellers evaluated vendor margin structures, and which pricing levers drove partner commitment versus defection to competing OEMs.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 channel partners in 6 metros, capturing margin floor expectations , deal registration compliance , co-sell frequency , and ranked preference scores across 4 competing CPaaS vendor programs.

DELIVERED

A partner-tier pricing corridor by reseller type, a ranked program attribute preference map , and a defection risk framework identifying the specific margin thresholds and support gaps that pushed partners toward competing vendor programs.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between single-OEM partners, multi-OEM partners and direct-touch VARs?

How will you measure OEM support preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full partner sales cycle and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our channel recruitment and retention performance?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call