RETAIL & FAMILY BANKING

Joint Account Usage & Family Banking Survey

Measure how joint account holders evaluate, compare, and choose banking products across shared finances, digital access, and family-tier needs, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, refine product positioning, and reduce household churn.

Pan-India sample
Joint account holders (Primary Financial Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Onboarding friction & drop-offsIdentify where joint applicants stall, disengage, or abandon account setup.
Product fit & segment trade-offsBenchmark feature priorities, fee sensitivity, and switching triggers across household segments.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most retail banks don't lose joint account holders purely on product features. They lose them due to unclear role-based access, misaligned financial goals between co-holders, friction at shared transaction points, weak family segment targeting, and poor visibility into household financial behavior, none of which fully show up in core banking reports or CRM activity logs.

If you are...

  • Retail banking product head
  • Family segment proposition lead
  • Digital banking growth head
  • Branch network distribution head
  • Deposits and liabilities strategy lead

You're likely facing...

  • Joint account dormancy: usage drop-off
  • Co-holder role confusion: access vs control
  • Family segment: undifferentiated product fit
  • Digital vs branch friction gap
  • Cross-sell failure at household level

This will help answer...

  • Primary usage drivers by co-holder
  • Activation drop-off stage
  • Household segment preference splits
  • Fee sensitivity vs feature priority
  • Switching triggers at renewal point

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete joint account holder journey from account opening to long-term household banking consolidation.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Motivation

  • Triggers for joint account opening
  • Primary applicant vs. co-holder role
TENETS 02

Bank Selection

  • Primary bank chosen for joint account
  • Shortlisted institutions before final choice
TENETS 03

Product & Features

  • Account type and operating mode
  • Feature adoption across both holders
TENETS 04

Onboarding Friction

  • KYC and documentation drop-off points
  • Co-holder verification delays and gaps
TENETS 05

Usage & Transactions

  • Transaction frequency by account holder
  • Channel split across digital and branch
TENETS 06

Pricing & Value

  • Fee sensitivity across account holders
  • Minimum balance burden and waivers
TENETS 07

Trust & Conflict

  • Dispute resolution between co-holders
  • Bank's role in household financial disagreements
TENETS 08

Consolidation & Loyalty

  • Cross-product uptake from joint account
  • Household banking consolidation intent

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Joint Account Usage and Family Banking Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across account-holder segments.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Measuring joint account feature usage and satisfaction.
2
Ranking decision drivers by account-holder role.
3
Comparing segments by household type and tenure.
Deliverables
Driver ranking
Feature gap matrix
Segment profiles
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Older joint account holders with low digital comfort.
2
Quick coverage across smaller towns and branches.
Deliverables
Representative coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-value family banking relationships needing verification.
2
Households with complex multi-member account structures.
Deliverables
Cohort insights
Rich journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to reach low-digital and older joint account holders in smaller towns.
Consider adding: F2F for high-value family banking cohorts and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test messaging and co-ownership propositions.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the retail banking and household finance space.

CASELET 1

Savings account feature preference & trade-off mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Digital banking channel adoption & drop-off diagnosis (South India)

Savings account feature preference & trade-off mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size private bank needed to identify how salaried dual-income households and self-employed couples prioritise features when selecting a primary savings account, and which friction points drive account dormancy within the first 6 months.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing feature trade-off rankings, minimum balance tolerance, digital onboarding friction, and branch dependency scores segmented by household income band and account tenure.

DELIVERED

A feature priority corridor by household segment, a dormancy trigger map identifying the 3 highest-friction onboarding steps, and a messaging territory framework separating acquisition hooks from retention levers by income band.
CASELET 1

Savings account feature preference & trade-off mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Digital banking channel adoption & drop-off diagnosis (South India)

Savings account feature preference & trade-off mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size private bank needed to identify how salaried dual-income households and self-employed couples prioritise features when selecting a primary savings account, and which friction points drive account dormancy within the first 6 months.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing feature trade-off rankings, minimum balance tolerance, digital onboarding friction, and branch dependency scores segmented by household income band and account tenure.

DELIVERED

A feature priority corridor by household segment, a dormancy trigger map identifying the 3 highest-friction onboarding steps, and a messaging territory framework separating acquisition hooks from retention levers by income band.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between single-income joint holders, dual-income joint holders and multi-generational account users?

How will you measure joint account preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full joint account opening journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our cross-sell and household deepening strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call