LIFE INSURANCE & DISTRIBUTION

Life Insurance Agent Policy Recommendation & Last-Mile Conversion Survey

Map how life insurance agents evaluate, recommend, and navigate objections across product types, customer segments, and closing conversations, so you can sharpen conversion strategy, fix channel incentive gaps, and benchmark last-mile acquisition performance.

Pan-India sample
Life insurance agents (Active Policy-Selling Agents)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Recommendation friction & drop-offsIdentify where agents stall, switch products, or lose prospects at closing.
Policy fit & conversion driversRank the product attributes, commission signals, and trust cues agents prioritize.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most life insurance agents don't lose policy conversions purely on premium pricing. They lose them due to misaligned product recommendations, unresolved customer objections, weak need-assessment habits, poor follow-up sequencing, and trust deficits at the closing stage, none of which fully show up in policy issuance reports or CRM activity logs.

If you are...

  • Life insurer: agency channel head
  • Bancassurance or tied-agency distributor
  • Product head: term or ULIP portfolio
  • Sales training and enablement lead
  • Distribution strategy or growth head

You're likely facing...

  • Recommendation-to-issuance drop-off gap
  • Agent fit confusion: term vs ULIP
  • High pitch volume, low closure rate
  • Objection handling: premium vs coverage
  • Persistency erosion at renewal stage

This will help answer...

  • Recommendation drivers beyond premium
  • Last-mile conversion drop-off stage
  • Segment fit: term vs savings products
  • Commission vs customer-need tension
  • Lapse and renewal switching triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete agent-led policy journey from prospect identification to first-year persistency.

TENETS 01

Prospect & Discovery

  • Lead sourcing channels used
  • First-contact conversion triggers
TENETS 02

Needs Assessment

  • Client profiling tools and methods
  • Coverage gap identification practices
TENETS 03

Plan Recommendation

  • Product selection criteria by segment
  • Term vs. ULIP vs. endowment preference
TENETS 04

Objection & Friction

  • Drop-off points before proposal stage
  • Common client objection categories
TENETS 05

Pricing & Affordability

  • Premium sensitivity by income band
  • Rider attachment and upsell rates
TENETS 06

Closure & Issuance

  • Documentation and KYC friction points
  • Proposal-to-issuance turnaround time
TENETS 07

Persistency & Renewal

  • First-year lapse triggers by plan type
  • Renewal follow-up cadence and tools
TENETS 08

Insurer & Support

  • Branch and BDM support satisfaction
  • Training, incentive, and contest impact

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Life Insurance Agent Policy Recommendation and Last-Mile Conversion Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking policy recommendation drivers by agent tier
2
Measuring last-mile conversion drop-off rates
3
Comparing segments by product line and channel
Deliverables
Conversion driver ranking
Recommendation gap matrix
Agent segment profiles
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Tied agents with low digital platform adoption
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets
Deliverables
Agent coverage map
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-ticket policy agents needing contextual verification
2
Bancassurance and broker cohorts in key cities
Deliverables
Conversion journey maps
High-value agent profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Objection frameworks
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI for tied agents and Tier 2 markets with low digital access.
Consider adding: F2F interviews for bancassurance and high-ticket agent cohorts, plus a focused FGD layer to pressure-test objection-handling and last-mile messaging.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the life insurance distribution space.

CASELET 1

Term plan messaging & channel preference mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Agent trust & recommendation driver segmentation (South India)

Term plan messaging & channel preference mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A private life insurer needed to identify which policy communication triggers move first-time term buyers and lapsed policyholders toward purchase, and which channel touchpoints they trust most at the point of commitment.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing message recall, trust attribution by channel, objection triggers, and preferred contact cadence for both direct digital and agent-assisted purchase paths.

DELIVERED

A channel preference map by buyer segment, a ranked message territory framework for term and ULIP positioning, and a friction list identifying the 4 objection types most likely to stall last-mile commitment.
CASELET 1

Term plan messaging & channel preference mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Agent trust & recommendation driver segmentation (South India)

Term plan messaging & channel preference mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A private life insurer needed to identify which policy communication triggers move first-time term buyers and lapsed policyholders toward purchase, and which channel touchpoints they trust most at the point of commitment.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing message recall, trust attribution by channel, objection triggers, and preferred contact cadence for both direct digital and agent-assisted purchase paths.

DELIVERED

A channel preference map by buyer segment, a ranked message territory framework for term and ULIP positioning, and a friction list identifying the 4 objection types most likely to stall last-mile commitment.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between tied agents, independent brokers and bancassurance advisors?

How will you measure policy recommendation preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full agent-to-policyholder conversion journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our agent recruitment and retention outcomes?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call