RETAIL LENDING & CREDIT

Loan EMI Stress & Repayment Strategy Survey

Retail borrowers evaluate, compare, and navigate EMI affordability, repayment tenure, and restructuring options across lenders, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix repayment-stage retention, and benchmark pricing against borrower willingness to pay.

Pan-India sample
Retail borrowers (Active EMI Payers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Repayment friction & drop-off signalsIdentify where borrowers miss payments, defer EMIs, or seek restructuring.
Stress triggers & segment riskIsolate income brackets, loan types, and tenure bands driving default risk.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most lenders don't lose borrowers purely on interest rate. They lose them due to EMI rigidity, opaque restructuring options, misaligned tenure choices, poor stress communication, and weak early-warning triggers, none of which fully show up in repayment dashboards or delinquency reports.

If you are...

  • Retail lending product head
  • NBFC vs bank competitor
  • Credit risk policy lead
  • Collections strategy manager
  • Consumer lending growth head

You're likely facing...

  • EMI burden vs income mismatch
  • Restructuring uptake: low awareness gap
  • Banks = rigid/safe perception
  • NBFCs = flexible/costly perception
  • Pre-default drop-off: no early signal

This will help answer...

  • Stress trigger points by segment
  • Restructuring preference vs awareness gap
  • Tenure vs EMI trade-off
  • Switching triggers at renewal
  • Lender trust by borrower profile

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete borrower journey from loan origination to full repayment closure.

TENETS 01

Stress Onset & Triggers

  • Income disruption, expense shock
  • First missed EMI circumstances
TENETS 02

EMI Burden Profile

  • EMI-to-income ratio range
  • Active loan count, tenure mix
TENETS 03

Lender Engagement

  • Proactive outreach, response timing
  • Relationship manager accessibility
TENETS 04

Restructuring & Relief

  • Moratorium uptake, restructuring terms
  • Partial payment, tenure extension
TENETS 05

Repayment Prioritisation

  • Loan hierarchy, default sequencing
  • Discretionary spend trade-offs
TENETS 06

Coping & Workarounds

  • Informal borrowing, asset liquidation
  • Side income, expense deferral
TENETS 07

Credit Score Impact

  • CIBIL score awareness, delinquency fear
  • Bureau reporting, future credit access
TENETS 08

Recovery & Resilience

  • Time to full repayment normalcy
  • Behavioural change, future loan intent

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Loan EMI Stress and Repayment Strategy Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across borrower segments.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Measuring EMI stress levels by loan type
2
Ranking repayment coping strategies by segment
3
Comparing delinquency risk across income bands
Deliverables
Stress severity index
Repayment strategy matrix
Segment risk bands
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Low-income borrowers with limited digital access
2
Quick pulse across Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns
Deliverables
Borrower coverage map
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-ticket borrowers in sensitive delinquency stages
2
Informal income earners requiring contextual verification
Deliverables
Cluster stress profiles
Rich repayment journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Messaging concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to capture borrowers in low-digital and Tier 2 or Tier 3 markets.
Consider adding: F2F for high-ticket or informal-income cohorts and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test restructuring messaging and repayment communication.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the retail lending and personal finance space.

CASELET 1

Personal loan restructuring triggers & borrower segment mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Home loan prepayment intent & channel preference study (West India)

Personal loan restructuring triggers & borrower segment mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to identify which salaried borrower segments were most likely to request EMI restructuring , and what income shocks, tenure preferences, and lender-switching intent drove those requests across Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 active personal loan holders, capturing income volatility events, missed EMI frequency, restructuring awareness, preferred repayment tenure, and likelihood to approach a competing lender within the next 6 months.

DELIVERED

A borrower stress segmentation framework ranked by restructuring propensity, a trigger map linking income shock types to repayment behaviour shifts, and a set of retention levers prioritised by segment and outstanding loan size.
CASELET 1

Personal loan restructuring triggers & borrower segment mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Home loan prepayment intent & channel preference study (West India)

Personal loan restructuring triggers & borrower segment mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to identify which salaried borrower segments were most likely to request EMI restructuring , and what income shocks, tenure preferences, and lender-switching intent drove those requests across Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 active personal loan holders, capturing income volatility events, missed EMI frequency, restructuring awareness, preferred repayment tenure, and likelihood to approach a competing lender within the next 6 months.

DELIVERED

A borrower stress segmentation framework ranked by restructuring propensity, a trigger map linking income shock types to repayment behaviour shifts, and a set of retention levers prioritised by segment and outstanding loan size.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between salaried borrowers, self-employed borrowers and gig-income borrowers?

How will you measure repayment prioritisation beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full loan repayment journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our collections and retention messaging?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call