LPG & ENERGY RETAIL

LPG Dealer Consumer Safety Advisory & Brand Recommendation Behaviour Survey

Map how LPG consumers evaluate safety advisories, compare dealer credibility, and choose cylinder brands, so you can sharpen acquisition messaging, fix retention gaps, and benchmark recommendation conversion by dealer segment.

Pan-India sample
LPG consumers (Primary Household Purchase Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Advisory trust & conversion gapsIdentify where dealer safety advisories convert to brand preference or lose credibility.
Recommendation drivers & segment rankBenchmark which dealer behaviours and safety cues rank highest across consumer segments.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most LPG distributors don't lose consumer trust purely on cylinder availability. They lose it due to inconsistent safety briefings, dealer-level advisory gaps, unverified regulator handling, weak refill-cycle communication, and misaligned brand messaging, none of which fully show up in complaint registers or distributor sales reports.

If you are...

  • LPG brand or OMC distributor
  • Dealer network head, urban or rural
  • Safety compliance or regulatory lead
  • Consumer marketing or brand head
  • Channel strategy or growth lead

You're likely facing...

  • Dealer advisory: inconsistent across geographies
  • Safety recall: low consumer awareness
  • Brand switch: post-incident trust erosion
  • Refill loyalty vs. price sensitivity gap
  • Regulator handling: perception vs. compliance

This will help answer...

  • Safety advisory influence on brand choice
  • Dealer trust gap by segment
  • Refill loyalty and switching triggers
  • Compliance perception vs. actual behaviour
  • Brand recommendation drivers at dealer level

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete LPG consumer journey from cylinder booking to brand advocacy.

TENETS 01

Dealer Discovery

  • First touchpoint, referral source
  • Distributor visibility, locality reach
TENETS 02

Safety Advisory

  • Safety briefing frequency, format
  • Cylinder handling instruction gaps
TENETS 03

Compliance Awareness

  • BIS standards, cylinder certification
  • Consumer knowledge of PESO norms
TENETS 04

Delivery Experience

  • Booking-to-delivery turnaround time
  • Delivery agent conduct, verification
TENETS 05

Brand Perception

  • OMC brand trust, recall ranking
  • Safety reputation vs. price perception
TENETS 06

Recommendation Triggers

  • Word-of-mouth referral conditions
  • Switching intent, portability awareness
TENETS 07

Grievance & Redressal

  • Complaint channel awareness, usage
  • Resolution speed, satisfaction rate
TENETS 08

Loyalty & Switching

  • Connection tenure, churn likelihood
  • Competing OMC trial, win-back barriers

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the LPG Dealer Consumer Safety Advisory and Brand Recommendation Behaviour Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking safety advisory frequency by dealer type
2
Measuring brand recommendation drivers at scale
3
Comparing consumer trust scores across LPG brands
Deliverables
Recommendation driver ranking
Safety advisory gap matrix
Brand trust scores
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Rural LPG consumers with low digital access
2
Quick coverage across dispersed dealer catchment zones
Deliverables
Rural segment coverage
Dealer zone diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-consumption households needing in-depth safety verification
2
Dealer forecourt intercepts in dense urban refill zones
Deliverables
Forecourt intercept data
Safety behaviour maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Advisory themes and quotes
Messaging concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI to capture rural and low-digital LPG consumers across dispersed dealer catchment zones.
Consider adding: F2F intercepts at high-volume refill points for safety behaviour verification, plus a focused FGD layer to pressure-test dealer advisory messaging and brand recommendation triggers.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the LPG distribution and household energy space.

CASELET 1

Cylinder refill channel preference & switching triggers (India)

CASELET 2

Dealer safety communication credibility & message territory audit (North India)

Cylinder refill channel preference & switching triggers (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India LPG distributor needed to isolate why domestic household consumers shifted between authorised dealers and informal refill sources , and which service attributes drove repeat booking versus defection.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 states, sampling 900 households, capturing refill frequency, channel selection criteria, delivery wait tolerance, price sensitivity thresholds, and stated reasons for switching away from the primary registered dealer.

DELIVERED

A channel preference map by household income tier, a ranked switching trigger list by state cluster, and a loyalty driver framework identifying the 4 service dimensions that most strongly predicted repeat dealer engagement.
CASELET 1

Cylinder refill channel preference & switching triggers (India)

CASELET 2

Dealer safety communication credibility & message territory audit (North India)

Cylinder refill channel preference & switching triggers (India)

OBJECTIVE

A pan-India LPG distributor needed to isolate why domestic household consumers shifted between authorised dealers and informal refill sources , and which service attributes drove repeat booking versus defection.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 6 states, sampling 900 households, capturing refill frequency, channel selection criteria, delivery wait tolerance, price sensitivity thresholds, and stated reasons for switching away from the primary registered dealer.

DELIVERED

A channel preference map by household income tier, a ranked switching trigger list by state cluster, and a loyalty driver framework identifying the 4 service dimensions that most strongly predicted repeat dealer engagement.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between urban dealers, semi-urban dealers and rural dealers?

How will you measure brand recommendation behaviour beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full consumer safety advisory journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our dealer network performance and brand retention?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call