NBFI LENDING & FINANCE

NBFI Corporate Loan Client Satisfaction & CFO Relationship Perception Survey

CFOs and corporate treasury heads evaluate, compare, and navigate NBFI credit relationships across pricing, service responsiveness, and covenant flexibility, so you can sharpen retention strategy, fix acquisition messaging, and benchmark relationship manager performance.

Pan-India sample
Corporate borrowers (CFOs / Treasury Heads)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Relationship friction & churn signalsIdentify where corporate clients disengage, escalate, or switch NBFI lenders.
Pricing perception & covenant trade-offsBenchmark satisfaction across interest rate, fee structure, and covenant flexibility.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most NBFIs don't lose corporate loan clients purely on interest rate. They lose them due to relationship opacity, inconsistent credit communication, CFO-level trust deficits, renewal friction, and misaligned facility structuring, none of which fully show up in loan management systems or portfolio health dashboards.

If you are...

  • NBFI competing against bank credit desks
  • Corporate lending product head
  • CFO relationship or coverage lead
  • Credit growth or origination head
  • Strategy lead, corporate finance vertical

You're likely facing...

  • CFO trust gap: NBFI vs bank
  • Drop-offs at credit structuring stage
  • Banks = credible/slow perception
  • NBFIs = flexible/costly perception
  • Renewal attrition: service vs rate

This will help answer...

  • CFO relationship satisfaction drivers
  • Credit journey drop-off stage
  • NBFI vs bank segment preference
  • Fee, tenure, and pricing tension
  • Renewal risk and switching triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete corporate borrower journey from lender discovery to portfolio renewal.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Trust

  • Initial NBFI awareness channels
  • First-contact credibility signals
TENETS 02

Preference Drivers

  • Lender selection criteria, ranked
  • NBFI vs. bank trade-off triggers
TENETS 03

Product & Servicing

  • Loan product fit, corporate use cases
  • Servicing touchpoints, post-disbursement
TENETS 04

Journey Friction

  • Sanction-to-disbursement bottlenecks
  • Documentation burden, credit appraisal stage
TENETS 05

Pricing & WTP

  • Rate sensitivity, corporate borrower segments
  • Fee structure transparency, processing charges
TENETS 06

Usage & Stickiness

  • Facility utilisation patterns, drawdown frequency
  • Renewal intent, multi-product adoption
TENETS 07

CFO Relationship

  • RM responsiveness, escalation access
  • CFO-level engagement, strategic advisory
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Lender wallet share, active facilities
  • Switch triggers, competing NBFI shortlist

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the NBFI Corporate Loan Client Satisfaction and CFO Relationship Perception Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Measuring satisfaction scores across loan product lines
2
Ranking CFO relationship drivers by corporate segment
3
Benchmarking NPS by ticket size and industry
Deliverables
Satisfaction driver ranking
CFO perception matrix
Segment NPS bands
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
CFOs in mid-market firms with low digital engagement
2
Quick coverage across multiple regional NBFI markets
Deliverables
Regional CFO coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Large-ticket borrowers requiring relationship depth verification
2
CFOs in sectors with complex multi-lender credit structures
Deliverables
High-value client maps
Relationship depth profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Proposition feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quantitative layer, supported by CATI for CFOs in mid-market and regional corporates with lower digital accessibility.
Consider adding: Face-to-face interviews for large-ticket borrower cohorts and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test relationship manager positioning and CFO retention messaging.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the NBFI corporate lending space.

CASELET 1

Corporate borrower channel preference & relationship friction (India)

CASELET 2

CFO trust calibration & lender positioning in working capital (India)

Corporate borrower channel preference & relationship friction (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to isolate why mid-market corporates and large-enterprise borrowers renewed credit facilities with incumbent lenders rather than switching, and which relationship touchpoints drove that inertia.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 corporate finance decision-makers in six cities, capturing renewal trigger timing, relationship manager responsiveness scores, documentation cycle length, and perceived flexibility of covenant terms by lender category.

DELIVERED

A switching-barrier map by borrower segment, a ranked friction list across five relationship stages, and a set of channel levers identifying where proactive RM contact most reduced renewal risk for the client.
CASELET 1

Corporate borrower channel preference & relationship friction (India)

CASELET 2

CFO trust calibration & lender positioning in working capital (India)

Corporate borrower channel preference & relationship friction (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to isolate why mid-market corporates and large-enterprise borrowers renewed credit facilities with incumbent lenders rather than switching, and which relationship touchpoints drove that inertia.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 corporate finance decision-makers in six cities, capturing renewal trigger timing, relationship manager responsiveness scores, documentation cycle length, and perceived flexibility of covenant terms by lender category.

DELIVERED

A switching-barrier map by borrower segment, a ranked friction list across five relationship stages, and a set of channel levers identifying where proactive RM contact most reduced renewal risk for the client.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between large corporates, mid-market borrowers and emerging enterprise clients?

How will you measure CFO relationship perception beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full corporate loan relationship journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our relationship manager deployment and retention strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call