TRAVEL & OTA

OTA Consumer Unmet Booking Experience & Competitive White Space Survey

Online travel shoppers evaluate, compare, and choose between OTA platforms on price transparency, booking friction, and trust signals, so you can sharpen conversion strategy, fix acquisition gaps, and benchmark positioning against competitive white space.

Multi-Market Sample
OTA Users (Active Bookers, 18-45)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Booking friction & drop-offsIdentify where travellers hesitate, compare platforms, or abandon booking flows.
White space & unmet needsMap unserved traveller expectations across search, pricing, and post-booking stages.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most OTAs don't lose bookings purely on price. They lose them due to friction at search, opaque fee reveals, weak trust signals, poor itinerary flexibility, and mismatched personalisation, none of which fully show up in funnel analytics or session replay tools.

If you are...

  • OTA competing against metasearch
  • Challenger OTA vs dominant platform
  • Product head, booking experience
  • Revenue and pricing strategy lead
  • Growth and retention team

You're likely facing...

  • Drop-off: search to payment stage
  • Fee reveal: trust vs conversion gap
  • OTA vs direct booking confusion
  • Loyalty friction: repeat vs lapsed users
  • White space: unmet segment needs

This will help answer...

  • Booking abandonment triggers by stage
  • Unmet needs by traveller segment
  • Fee transparency vs conversion trade-off
  • Competitive switch and loyalty drivers
  • White space by trip type

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete traveler booking journey from platform discovery to post-trip advocacy.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Entry

  • First platform visited, trigger event
  • Search-to-OTA arrival channel
TENETS 02

Search & Filtering

  • Filter usage, sort preference gaps
  • Results relevance, ranking trust
TENETS 03

Pricing & Transparency

  • Fee disclosure timing, hidden charges
  • Price parity perception across platforms
TENETS 04

Checkout Friction

  • Drop-off points, form abandonment triggers
  • Payment method gaps, error recovery
TENETS 05

Trust & Reviews

  • Review authenticity signals, rating weight
  • Verification cues, photo credibility
TENETS 06

Post-Booking Support

  • Cancellation, modification self-service gaps
  • Refund speed, support channel preference
TENETS 07

Loyalty & Retention

  • Repeat booking triggers, reward redemption
  • Membership tier value, churn signals
TENETS 08

Competitive White Space

  • Unmet needs, platform switching triggers
  • Feature gaps across leading OTA players

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the OTA Consumer Unmet Booking Experience & Competitive White Space Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking unmet needs across booking journey stages
2
Mapping platform switching triggers by traveler segment
3
Benchmarking feature satisfaction across competing OTAs
Deliverables
Unmet need rankings
White space matrix
Segment gap scores
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Older or low-digital frequent travelers booking by phone
2
Tier 2 and Tier 3 city traveler coverage
Deliverables
Offline segment data
City-tier breakdowns
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-frequency business travelers with complex itinerary needs
2
Luxury and premium segment requiring in-depth booking context
Deliverables
High-value cohort profiles
Booking friction maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Verbatim themes
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quantitative layer, targeting frequent OTA users across leisure, business, and bleisure traveler segments to capture booking experience gaps and competitive white space at scale.
Consider adding: CATI for Tier 2 and Tier 3 city travelers with low digital engagement, and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test white space hypotheses and validate feature concepts before product or GTM decisions are locked.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the online travel and booking space.

CASELET 1

Flight booking drop-off triggers & channel preference (India)

CASELET 2

Hotel discovery & trust gap diagnosis for OTA positioning (Southeast Asia)

Flight booking drop-off triggers & channel preference (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size online travel platform needed to isolate why price-sensitive leisure bookers and time-pressed business travellers abandoned completed searches, and which competing platforms captured those sessions instead.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a quant survey across 600 respondents in 6 metro and tier-1 cities, capturing session abandonment triggers, last-platform-used, price comparison behaviour, payment friction points, and stated reasons for switching to a competitor at checkout.

DELIVERED

A drop-off friction map by traveller segment, a ranked trigger list across 9 abandonment reasons, a competitor capture corridor showing which platforms won defected sessions, and a checkout friction framework by device type.
CASELET 1

Flight booking drop-off triggers & channel preference (India)

CASELET 2

Hotel discovery & trust gap diagnosis for OTA positioning (Southeast Asia)

Flight booking drop-off triggers & channel preference (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size online travel platform needed to isolate why price-sensitive leisure bookers and time-pressed business travellers abandoned completed searches, and which competing platforms captured those sessions instead.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a quant survey across 600 respondents in 6 metro and tier-1 cities, capturing session abandonment triggers, last-platform-used, price comparison behaviour, payment friction points, and stated reasons for switching to a competitor at checkout.

DELIVERED

A drop-off friction map by traveller segment, a ranked trigger list across 9 abandonment reasons, a competitor capture corridor showing which platforms won defected sessions, and a checkout friction framework by device type.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between leisure-only bookers, business-only bookers and mixed-purpose travellers?

How will you measure platform preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full booking journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our conversion rate and retention strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call