SMART BUILDINGS & PROPTECH

Smart Building Technology Adoption Survey

Facility directors, technology heads, and real estate portfolio managers evaluate, compare, and navigate smart building platforms, integration complexity, and vendor lock-in trade-offs, so you can sharpen positioning, fix conversion gaps, and benchmark adoption triggers by segment.

Pan-India sample
Facility & PropTech decision-makers (Technology Heads, Facility Directors)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Adoption friction & drop-offsIdentify where building technology evaluators stall, disengage, or abandon vendor shortlists.
Platform selection & trade-offsBenchmark integration priorities, payback period expectations, and feature-level dealbreakers by segment.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most building technology leads don't lose adoption budgets purely on cost. They lose them due to unclear ROI proof points, fragmented vendor positioning, tenant readiness gaps, integration complexity, and misaligned sustainability mandates, none of which fully show up in energy audit reports or facility management dashboards.

If you are...

  • Smart building solution vendor
  • PropTech platform scaling enterprise
  • Building automation product head
  • Real estate portfolio strategy lead
  • Facilities and operations director

You're likely facing...

  • ROI proof gap: pilot vs rollout
  • Vendor fit confusion: niche vs platform
  • Tenant mandate vs owner budget tension
  • Integration drop-off: legacy BMS systems
  • Sustainability compliance vs adoption pace

This will help answer...

  • Adoption drivers beyond energy savings
  • Decision stage and budget drop-off
  • Segment preference: retrofit vs new build
  • Pricing tolerance and payback thresholds
  • Switching triggers and vendor lock-in

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete smart building journey from technology evaluation to full-portfolio deployment.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Triggers

  • Initial technology awareness channels
  • Procurement trigger events, timelines
TENETS 02

Vendor Selection

  • Shortlisting criteria, weighting
  • Incumbent vs. challenger preference
TENETS 03

System Integration

  • BMS, HVAC, lighting interoperability
  • Legacy infrastructure retrofit complexity
TENETS 04

Deployment Friction

  • Installation delays, scope creep
  • Stakeholder alignment breakdowns
TENETS 05

Pricing & ROI

  • CapEx vs. OpEx model preference
  • Payback period expectations, benchmarks
TENETS 06

Usage & Adoption

  • Facilities manager platform engagement
  • Feature utilisation gaps, dormant modules
TENETS 07

Sustainability & Compliance

  • ESG reporting, green certification targets
  • Regulatory deadline pressure, carbon mandates
TENETS 08

Expansion & Roadmap

  • Portfolio-wide rollout intent, timelines
  • Next-phase technology priorities

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Smart Building Technology Adoption Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across facility, technology, and procurement decision-makers.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking BMS, IoT, and HVAC automation priorities
2
Measuring adoption stage by building type and portfolio size
3
Benchmarking vendor selection criteria across segments
Deliverables
Adoption stage matrix
Technology priority ranking
Vendor shortlist drivers
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Facility managers with low digital survey engagement
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 building clusters
Deliverables
Regional coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Large commercial portfolios with complex procurement cycles
2
High-value retrofits requiring contextual verification
Deliverables
Cluster insights
Procurement journey maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Barrier themes
Messaging concepts
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting facility managers, heads of real estate, and building technology procurement leads across commercial, industrial, and mixed-use portfolios.
Consider adding: CATI for Tier 2 and Tier 3 building owners with low digital engagement, and F2F interviews for large-portfolio accounts where retrofit investment decisions require deeper contextual mapping.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the smart building technology space.

CASELET 1

Occupant experience & sensor adoption friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Energy management platform messaging & channel strategy (Southeast Asia)

Occupant experience & sensor adoption friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

Identify how facility managers and corporate real estate heads in Grade A commercial buildings evaluate HVAC automation versus manual controls , and which friction points stall sensor deployment decisions past the pilot stage.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 respondents in Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad, capturing technology shortlists, pilot-to-rollout conversion barriers, vendor evaluation criteria, and budget approval cycles for building automation systems in leased versus owned premises.

DELIVERED

A friction list by deployment stage, a segment framework separating early adopters from compliance-driven buyers, and a pricing corridor benchmarked against willingness-to-pay thresholds across building ownership types.
CASELET 1

Occupant experience & sensor adoption friction mapping (India)

CASELET 2

Energy management platform messaging & channel strategy (Southeast Asia)

Occupant experience & sensor adoption friction mapping (India)

OBJECTIVE

Identify how facility managers and corporate real estate heads in Grade A commercial buildings evaluate HVAC automation versus manual controls , and which friction points stall sensor deployment decisions past the pilot stage.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 respondents in Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad, capturing technology shortlists, pilot-to-rollout conversion barriers, vendor evaluation criteria, and budget approval cycles for building automation systems in leased versus owned premises.

DELIVERED

A friction list by deployment stage, a segment framework separating early adopters from compliance-driven buyers, and a pricing corridor benchmarked against willingness-to-pay thresholds across building ownership types.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between commercial office, industrial, and mixed-use respondents?

How will you measure technology selection decisions beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full technology procurement journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our go-to-market positioning for smart building solutions?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call