STUDENT LENDING & FINANCE

Student Loan Decision & Repayment Behaviour Survey

Map how student borrowers evaluate lenders, compare repayment terms, and choose between loan products, so you can sharpen acquisition targeting, fix repayment conversion gaps, and benchmark pricing against borrower willingness to pay.

Pan-India sample
Student borrowers (Active loan applicants)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Application friction & drop-offsIdentify where student borrowers stall, compare lenders, or abandon loan applications.
Repayment drivers & trade-offsIsolate repayment triggers, tenure preferences, and default-risk signals by borrower segment.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most student lenders don't lose borrowers purely on interest rate. They lose them due to opaque repayment structures, misaligned loan tenure expectations, poor income-to-EMI fit, limited refinancing awareness, and post-disbursement service gaps, none of which fully show up in loan origination reports or delinquency dashboards.

If you are...

  • Education lender vs fintech competition
  • NBFC targeting underserved student segments
  • Credit product head, student portfolio
  • Retail lending growth or distribution lead
  • Repayment strategy or collections team

You're likely facing...

  • Loan tenure vs income mismatch
  • Drop-offs at repayment onset stage
  • Banks = safe/inflexible borrower perception
  • Fintechs = fast/costly repayment perception
  • Refinancing triggers and early exit gaps

This will help answer...

  • Repayment preference drivers beyond rate
  • Drop-off stage in repayment journey
  • Segment split by loan type
  • EMI burden vs tenure tolerance
  • Refinancing and lender-switch triggers

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete borrower journey from loan discovery to full repayment.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Awareness

  • First lender touchpoint, channel
  • Information sources before application
TENETS 02

Lender Selection

  • Shortlisting criteria, ranked priority
  • Public vs. private lender preference
TENETS 03

Application & Onboarding

  • Documentation burden, processing time
  • Digital vs. branch application channel
TENETS 04

Journey Friction

  • Drop-off points, abandonment triggers
  • Escalation frequency, resolution time
TENETS 05

Pricing & WTP

  • Interest rate sensitivity, fee tolerance
  • Fixed vs. floating rate preference
TENETS 06

Repayment Behaviour

  • EMI mode, moratorium utilisation
  • Prepayment intent, part-payment frequency
TENETS 07

Trust & Satisfaction

  • Lender NPS, post-disbursal support
  • Complaint resolution, transparency rating
TENETS 08

Switching & Refinance

  • Balance transfer intent, trigger events
  • Refinance awareness, competitive pull

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Student Loan Decision and Repayment Behaviour Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking lender selection drivers by borrower segment
2
Mapping repayment behaviour across loan tenure stages
3
Benchmarking refinancing intent by income and institution type
Deliverables
Driver ranking
Repayment behaviour matrix
Segment comparison cuts
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Borrowers with limited digital access or comfort
2
Quick coverage across tier-2 and tier-3 geographies
Deliverables
Geographic coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
High-balance borrowers in professional or postgraduate cohorts
2
Contextual mapping of campus-to-repayment transition behaviour
Deliverables
Cohort journey maps
High-value borrower profiles
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Messaging feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, supported by CATI for borrowers in low-digital or tier-2 geographies where panel reach is thin.
Consider adding: F2F interviews for high-balance postgraduate and professional cohorts, plus a focused FGD layer to pressure-test repayment communication and hardship messaging.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the student finance and lending space.

CASELET 1

Education loan channel preference & borrower segmentation (India)

CASELET 2

Student debt repayment stress & messaging territory mapping (India)

Education loan channel preference & borrower segmentation (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to segment first-generation borrowers and repeat education loan applicants by lender preference, isolating how interest rate sensitivity , co-applicant dependency , and disbursement speed shaped the final lender choice.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing lender shortlist composition , channel of first contact , collateral tolerance , and turnaround time expectations by borrower tier and course type.

DELIVERED

A borrower segment framework by risk appetite and lender affinity, a channel preference map by city tier, and a ranked friction list covering documentation burden and processing delays by lender category.
CASELET 1

Education loan channel preference & borrower segmentation (India)

CASELET 2

Student debt repayment stress & messaging territory mapping (India)

Education loan channel preference & borrower segmentation (India)

OBJECTIVE

A digital-first NBFC needed to segment first-generation borrowers and repeat education loan applicants by lender preference, isolating how interest rate sensitivity , co-applicant dependency , and disbursement speed shaped the final lender choice.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 600 respondents in 8 cities, capturing lender shortlist composition , channel of first contact , collateral tolerance , and turnaround time expectations by borrower tier and course type.

DELIVERED

A borrower segment framework by risk appetite and lender affinity, a channel preference map by city tier, and a ranked friction list covering documentation burden and processing delays by lender category.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between government loan borrowers, private bank borrowers and NBFC borrowers?

How will you measure loan selection decisions beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full student loan journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our borrower acquisition and collections strategy?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call