TRAVEL & MICE

Travel & MICE Agent Corporate Client Advisory & Destination Recommendation Survey

Map how corporate travel managers, MICE procurement leads, and event planners evaluate, compare, and choose agents across advisory quality, destination fit, and contract terms, so you can sharpen acquisition, refine positioning, and improve conversion rates.

Pan-India sample
Corporate travel buyers (MICE & Travel Decision-Makers)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Advisory gaps & conversion frictionIdentify where corporate clients disengage, switch agents, or stall on destination sign-off.
Destination drivers & mandate trade-offsBenchmark which destination attributes, budget thresholds, and compliance factors determine final recommendations.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most travel and MICE agents don't lose corporate accounts purely on destination pricing. They lose them due to misread client priorities, weak destination differentiation, poor post-trip feedback loops, misaligned event format preferences, and reactive rather than consultative advisory positioning, none of which fully show up in booking platform data or post-event satisfaction scores.

If you are...

  • Corporate travel agency, mid-market

  • MICE specialist vs full-service agency

  • Destination advisory or DMC partner

  • Corporate travel procurement head

  • MICE programme or events lead

You're likely facing...

  • Destination shortlist: familiarity vs fit

  • Advisory trust gap: agent vs client

  • MICE brief misalignment: format vs budget

  • Repeat booking drop at renewal stage

  • Corporate clients = price-driven perception

This will help answer...

  • Corporate client destination preference drivers

  • Advisory drop-off and switching triggers

  • MICE format vs segment fit

  • Fee sensitivity and value perception

  • Repeat mandate and retention signals

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete corporate travel advisory journey from mandate briefing to post-event debrief.

TENETS 01

Mandate & Briefing

  • Corporate client brief formats
  • Budget disclosure at briefing stage
TENETS 02

Destination Recommendation

  • Shortlisting criteria, domestic vs. international
  • Client override frequency on agent picks
TENETS 03

Supplier & Venue

  • Preferred hotel and DMC panel criteria
  • Venue negotiation leverage points
TENETS 04

Pricing & Margin

  • Fee model vs. commission structure
  • Client price sensitivity by event type
TENETS 05

Proposal & Conversion

  • Proposal-to-confirmation conversion rate
  • Decision timeline by corporate segment
TENETS 06

On-Ground Delivery

  • Programme execution gaps vs. proposal
  • Real-time escalation and contingency handling
TENETS 07

Client Retention

  • Repeat mandate triggers and loyalty signals
  • Corporate travel manager relationship depth
TENETS 08

Competitive Positioning

  • Agency differentiation in corporate pitches
  • Threat from in-house corporate travel desks
Request a scope validation call

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Travel and MICE Agent Corporate Client Advisory and Destination Recommendation Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking destination preferences by corporate segment
2
Measuring MICE budget allocation and approval triggers
3
Benchmarking agent advisory frequency across client tiers
Deliverables
Destination preference rankings
Budget allocation matrix
Advisory frequency benchmarks
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
Agents managing high-volume offline corporate accounts
2
Quick coverage across Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets
Deliverables
Tier-wise agent coverage
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Senior corporate travel managers handling large MICE mandates
2
Agents advising on sensitive or high-spend destination decisions
Deliverables
High-value client journeys
Mandate decision maps
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Pitch concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting travel and MICE agents across corporate client tiers, supported by CATI for agents operating in low-digital or Tier 2 markets.
Consider adding: F2F interviews for senior agents managing large MICE mandates, and a focused FGD layer to pressure-test destination advisory messaging and corporate pitch positioning.
Confirm approach
Request timeline

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the corporate travel and MICE space.

CASELET 1

Corporate travel policy influence on agent selection & loyalty (India)

CASELET 2

MICE planner destination shortlisting criteria & venue gap study (India)

Corporate travel policy influence on agent selection & loyalty (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size business travel management company needed to map how corporate travel managers and procurement leads at large enterprises shortlist agents, weigh destination expertise against cost compliance , and decide whether to consolidate or split mandates across providers.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 corporate accounts in six cities, capturing agent shortlisting criteria , policy compliance thresholds , preferred booking channels , satisfaction scores by service tier, and stated switching triggers for each account segment.

DELIVERED

A segment preference map by account size, a ranked criteria hierarchy for agent selection, a switching trigger list by corporate tier, and a set of retention levers calibrated to procurement-led versus travel-manager-led accounts.
Talk to Survey Consultant
CASELET 1

Corporate travel policy influence on agent selection & loyalty (India)

CASELET 2

MICE planner destination shortlisting criteria & venue gap study (India)

Corporate travel policy influence on agent selection & loyalty (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size business travel management company needed to map how corporate travel managers and procurement leads at large enterprises shortlist agents, weigh destination expertise against cost compliance , and decide whether to consolidate or split mandates across providers.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 180 corporate accounts in six cities, capturing agent shortlisting criteria , policy compliance thresholds , preferred booking channels , satisfaction scores by service tier, and stated switching triggers for each account segment.

DELIVERED

A segment preference map by account size, a ranked criteria hierarchy for agent selection, a switching trigger list by corporate tier, and a set of retention levers calibrated to procurement-led versus travel-manager-led accounts.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between SME corporates, mid-market accounts and large enterprise clients?

How will you measure destination and venue preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full corporate travel and MICE planning journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our corporate client retention and mandate win rate?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call