ENTERPRISE TECH & COLLABORATION

Video Conferencing & Collaboration Tool Survey

Map how IT decision-makers, procurement leads, and end-user teams evaluate, compare, and choose video conferencing and collaboration platforms across security, integration, and cost, so you can sharpen positioning, fix conversion gaps, and benchmark pricing against willingness to pay.

Pan-India sample
Enterprise IT teams (IT Heads, Procurement Leads)
15-20 min
Talk to a Survey Consultant
Adoption friction & drop-offsIdentify where IT buyers stall, disengage, or abandon platform evaluation cycles.
Feature trade-offs & WTPRank must-have capabilities against price thresholds across distinct buyer segments.
TRUSTED BY LEADING BRANDS
Brand 0Brand 1Brand 2Brand 3Brand 4Brand 5Brand 6Brand 7Brand 8Brand 9Brand 10Brand 11Brand 12Brand 13Brand 14Brand 15Brand 16Brand 17Brand 18Brand 19Brand 20Brand 21Brand 22Brand 23Brand 24Brand 25Brand 26Brand 27Brand 28Brand 29Brand 30Brand 31

CONTEXT & RELEVANCE

Why run this survey now

Most collaboration platform owners don't lose users purely on feature gaps. They lose them due to unmet workflow fit, fragmented tool stacks, inconsistent meeting reliability, poor IT manageability, and misaligned licensing structures, none of which fully show up in product usage dashboards or helpdesk ticket data.

If you are...

  • Platform vendor vs UCaaS rival
  • Challenger tool targeting enterprise
  • Product planning or roadmap lead
  • IT procurement or vendor head
  • Revenue or licensing strategy lead

You're likely facing...

  • Tool sprawl: video vs messaging split
  • Drop-offs at IT approval stage
  • Incumbent = familiar/rigid perception
  • Challenger = capable/unproven perception
  • Renewal friction: seat count vs value

This will help answer...

  • Platform preference drivers beyond price
  • Adoption drop-off by workflow stage
  • Segment fit: SMB vs enterprise
  • Licensing friction and renewal triggers
  • Switching intent and consolidation signals

RESEARCH THEMES

What This Survey Investigates

Eight interconnected research themes that map the complete collaboration tool journey from initial discovery to platform consolidation.

TENETS 01

Discovery & Awareness

  • First touchpoint, trigger event
  • IT-led vs. employee-led discovery
TENETS 02

Selection Drivers

  • Feature priorities at shortlisting stage
  • IT security vs. end-user experience trade-offs
TENETS 03

Deployment & Rollout

  • Rollout timeline, phased vs. full deployment
  • IT support burden during onboarding
TENETS 04

Usage & Adoption

  • Active user rate by department
  • Shadow tool usage alongside primary platform
TENETS 05

Pricing & WTP

  • Per-seat cost tolerance by org size
  • Bundle vs. standalone pricing preference
TENETS 06

Friction & Drop-off

  • Meeting join failure points, guest access
  • Recurring complaints from end users
TENETS 07

Security & Compliance

  • Data residency, encryption requirements
  • Compliance mandates driving platform choice
TENETS 08

Renewal & Switching

  • Contract renewal triggers, churn signals
  • Competitive shortlist at renewal stage

SAMPLING STRATEGY

Tell us about your ideal sample

Help us understand your target respondent profile. Select what applies, we'll design the optimal sample plan based on your inputs.

Sample size
How many respondents do you need?
Not Selected
Target audience
Who should we survey?
Not Selected
Region
Which regions should we cover?
Not Selected
Segments
How should we slice the data?
Not Selected
Discuss sample plan

METHODOLOGY

Survey approach

For the Video Conferencing and Collaboration Tool Survey, we recommend a quant-first design with flexible data-collection modes to balance reach, depth, and verification across IT, procurement, and workforce experience functions.

PRIMARY
Online web surveySelf-administered survey shared via email / panels to capture structured responses at scale.
Best for
1
Ranking tool preference by user role and team size.
2
Measuring adoption barriers and switching intent.
3
Benchmarking feature satisfaction across platforms.
Deliverables
Feature priority matrix
Platform preference ranking
Adoption barrier index
OPTIONAL
CATI (phone survey)Interviewer-led telephone interviews to reach owners who are harder to get online.
Best for
1
IT decision-makers in low-digital or field-heavy firms.
2
Quick coverage across distributed regional office clusters.
Deliverables
Regional coverage data
Call-log diagnostics
SELECTIVE
Face-to-faceOn-ground surveys or interviews in key industrial clusters or high-value cohorts.
Best for
1
Enterprise IT heads managing multi-platform procurement decisions.
2
High-value accounts with complex hybrid-work infrastructure needs.
Deliverables
Procurement journey maps
Enterprise cluster insights
OPTIONAL
FGDs
Deliverables
Themes and quotes
Concept feedback
OPTIONAL
Mixed surveysAny 4-mode combo Online + CATI + F2F + FGDs to maximise reach and representation. Mode-specific quotas and weighting for clean comparisons.
Deliverables
Unified dataset
Mode-adjusted analytics
Our Recommendation
Start with: Online web survey as the core quant layer, targeting IT decision-makers, procurement leads, and end users across company sizes and industries.
Consider adding: CATI for firms with low digital survey participation and F2F for enterprise accounts where procurement complexity and multi-stakeholder dynamics require deeper verification.

EXECUTION PROCESS

How we execute

A proven 9-step process from scoping to delivery, designed to ensure quality, speed, and actionable insights.

Define the decision frame

Confirm objectives, target cohorts, geographies, and reporting cuts

Step 01

Define the decision frame

Design the instrument

Build workstream modules mapped to outputs (drivers, friction, pricing, retention, trust)

Step 02

Design the instrument

Lock the questionnaire

Review wording, sequencing, LOI, and competitive context; approve final version

Step 03

Lock the questionnaire

Pilot and calibrate

Test comprehension and ease quality; refine quotas and remove friction where needed

Step 04

Pilot and calibrate

Run fieldwork

Execute collection with active quota management and feasibility controls

Step 05

Run fieldwork

Assure quality

Dedupe, attention checks, speed/consistency rules, removals with audit trail

Step 06

Assure quality

Prepare the dataset

Clean data and deliver codebook/variable definitions

Step 07

Prepare the dataset

Analyse and synthesise

Driver ranking, leakage diagnostics, pricing bands, segment insights

Step 08

Analyse and synthesise

Deliver and align

Executive deck (optional dashboard) and leadership readout with recommendations

Step 09

Deliver and align

COMMERCIAL TERMS

Request a Commercial Proposal

Pricing depends on cohort, geography, sample size, approach, LOI, and deliverables. Configure below for an indicative estimate.

Select Sample Size

100

Geography

  • India
  • APAC (Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, NZ, Japan, Thailand)
  • Middle East (UAE, KSA, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait)
  • North America (US, Canada)
  • Europe
  • Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria)
  • LATAM (Brazil, Mexico)

Select Mode of Survey

  • Online
  • CATI
  • Online FGD (5 people per FGD)
  • F2F

Length of the Interview

  • Select
  • 0-15
  • 16-20
  • 21-30
  • 31-45
  • 46-60
  • Custom
Indicative Estimate
  • Indian Rupee (INR)
  • United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
  • Afghan Afghani (AFN)
  • Albanian Lek (ALL)
  • Armenian Dram (AMD)
  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder (ANG)
  • Angolan Kwanza (AOA)
  • Argentine Peso (ARS)
  • Australian Dollar (AUD)
  • Aruban Florin (AWG)
  • Azerbaijani Manat (AZN)
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark (BAM)
  • Barbadian Dollar (BBD)
  • Bangladeshi Taka (BDT)
  • Bulgarian Lev (BGN)
  • Bahraini Dinar (BHD)
  • Burundian Franc (BIF)
  • Bermudian Dollar (BMD)
  • Brunei Dollar (BND)
  • Bolivian Boliviano (BOB)
  • Brazilian Real (BRL)
  • Bahamian Dollar (BSD)
  • Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN)
  • Botswana Pula (BWP)
  • Belarusian Ruble (BYN)
  • Belize Dollar (BZD)
  • Canadian Dollar (CAD)
  • Congolese Franc (CDF)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Chilean Peso (CLP)
  • Chinese Yuan (CNY)
  • Colombian Peso (COP)
  • Costa Rican Colón (CRC)
  • Cuban Peso (CUP)
  • Cape Verdean Escudo (CVE)
  • Czech Koruna (CZK)
  • Djiboutian Franc (DJF)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Dominican Peso (DOP)
  • Algerian Dinar (DZD)
  • Egyptian Pound (EGP)
  • Eritrean Nakfa (ERN)
  • Ethiopian Birr (ETB)
  • Euro (EUR)
  • Fijian Dollar (FJD)
  • Falkland Islands Pound (FKP)
  • British Pound (GBP)
  • Georgian Lari (GEL)
  • Ghanaian Cedi (GHS)
  • Gibraltar Pound (GIP)
  • Gambian Dalasi (GMD)
  • Guinean Franc (GNF)
  • Guatemalan Quetzal (GTQ)
  • Guyanese Dollar (GYD)
  • Hong Kong Dollar (HKD)
  • Honduran Lempira (HNL)
  • Croatian Kuna (HRK)
  • Haitian Gourde (HTG)
  • Hungarian Forint (HUF)
  • Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)
  • Israeli New Shekel (ILS)
  • Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
  • Iranian Rial (IRR)
  • Icelandic Króna (ISK)
  • Jamaican Dollar (JMD)
  • Jordanian Dinar (JOD)
  • Japanese Yen (JPY)
  • Kenyan Shilling (KES)
  • Kyrgyzstani Som (KGS)
  • Cambodian Riel (KHR)
  • Comorian Franc (KMF)
  • South Korean Won (KRW)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Cayman Islands Dollar (KYD)
  • Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT)
  • Lao Kip (LAK)
  • Lebanese Pound (LBP)
  • Sri Lankan Rupee (LKR)
  • Liberian Dollar (LRD)
  • Lesotho Loti (LSL)
  • Libyan Dinar (LYD)
  • Moroccan Dirham (MAD)
  • Moldovan Leu (MDL)
  • Malagasy Ariary (MGA)
  • Macedonian Denar (MKD)
  • Burmese Kyat (MMK)
  • Mongolian Tögrög (MNT)
  • Macanese Pataca (MOP)
  • Mauritian Rupee (MUR)
  • Maldivian Rufiyaa (MVR)
  • Malawian Kwacha (MWK)
  • Mexican Peso (MXN)
  • Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)
  • Mozambican Metical (MZN)
  • Namibian Dollar (NAD)
  • Nigerian Naira (NGN)
  • Nicaraguan Córdoba (NIO)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Nepalese Rupee (NPR)
  • New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Omani Rial (OMR)
  • Panamanian Balboa (PAB)
  • Peruvian Sol (PEN)
  • Papua New Guinean Kina (PGK)
  • Philippine Peso (PHP)
  • Pakistani Rupee (PKR)
  • Polish Złoty (PLN)
  • Paraguayan Guaraní (PYG)
  • Qatari Riyal (QAR)
  • Romanian Leu (RON)
  • Serbian Dinar (RSD)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Rwandan Franc (RWF)
  • Saudi Riyal (SAR)
  • Solomon Islands Dollar (SBD)
  • Seychellois Rupee (SCR)
  • Sudanese Pound (SDG)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Saint Helena Pound (SHP)
  • Sierra Leonean Leone (SLL)
  • Somali Shilling (SOS)
  • Surinamese Dollar (SRD)
  • São Tomé and Príncipe Dobra (STD)
  • Syrian Pound (SYP)
  • Swazi Lilangeni (SZL)
  • Thai Baht (THB)
  • Tajikistani Somoni (TJS)
  • Turkmenistani Manat (TMT)
  • Tunisian Dinar (TND)
  • Tongan Paʻanga (TOP)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
  • Trinidad and Tobago Dollar (TTD)
  • New Taiwan Dollar (TWD)
  • Tanzanian Shilling (TZS)
  • Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH)
  • Ugandan Shilling (UGX)
  • United States Dollar (USD)
  • Uruguayan Peso (UYU)
  • Uzbekistani Som (UZS)
  • Vietnamese Đồng (VND)
  • Vanuatu Vatu (VUV)
  • Samoan Tālā (WST)
  • Central African CFA Franc (XAF)
  • East Caribbean Dollar (XCD)
  • West African CFA franc (XOF)
  • CFP Franc (XPF)
  • Yemeni Rial (YER)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Zambian Kwacha (ZMW)
  • Zimbabwean Dollar (ZWL)

$0.00

+ applicable taxes

Proposal turnaround typically 24–48 hours

Note: Estimate is indicative only. Final pricing is subject to scope finalization after discovery call.

REFERENCE CASELETS

Reference

Real-world examples of survey work in the workplace technology and collaboration space.

CASELET 1

Collaboration tool switching triggers & segment priorities (India)

CASELET 2

Remote work tool messaging & channel resonance study (Southeast Asia)

Collaboration tool switching triggers & segment priorities (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size enterprise software distributor needed to isolate why IT decision-makers and department heads in 200-to-1000-seat firms switch primary collaboration platforms , and which feature gaps or pricing events accelerate that decision.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 respondents in IT, finance, and operations functions, capturing switching triggers, contract renewal timelines, feature shortlists, and per-seat budget thresholds across four platform categories in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities.

DELIVERED

A segment-level switching trigger map , a ranked feature priority framework by company size band, a pricing corridor by seat volume, and a list of renewal-window levers tied to each buyer segment.
CASELET 1

Collaboration tool switching triggers & segment priorities (India)

CASELET 2

Remote work tool messaging & channel resonance study (Southeast Asia)

Collaboration tool switching triggers & segment priorities (India)

OBJECTIVE

A mid-size enterprise software distributor needed to isolate why IT decision-makers and department heads in 200-to-1000-seat firms switch primary collaboration platforms , and which feature gaps or pricing events accelerate that decision.

WHAT WE DID

Ran a structured quant survey across 320 respondents in IT, finance, and operations functions, capturing switching triggers, contract renewal timelines, feature shortlists, and per-seat budget thresholds across four platform categories in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities.

DELIVERED

A segment-level switching trigger map , a ranked feature priority framework by company size band, a pricing corridor by seat volume, and a list of renewal-window levers tied to each buyer segment.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions

Answers to frequently asked questions about this survey mandate.

What decisions will this survey enable?

Who is the buyer vs who are the respondents?

Can we see differences between SMB users, mid-market teams and enterprise IT buyers?

How will you measure platform preference beyond simple ratings?

Will the survey map the full tool evaluation and adoption journey and drop-offs?

Can this survey inform product and pricing strategy?

How will findings improve our pipeline conversion and renewal rates?

Still have questions?

Schedule a discovery call to discuss your specific needs and get a custom quote.

Book a Discovery Call