
Region:North America
Author(s):Shreya Garg
Product Code:KROD5925
December 2024
88

By Fuel Type: The market is segmented by fuel type into coal, natural gas, and oil. Among these, natural gas currently holds a dominant share in the market due to its cleaner combustion process and the push towards reducing emissions. The abundance of natural gas reserves in the US, along with the development of pipeline infrastructure, makes it the preferred choice for new power plants. Additionally, government regulations aimed at reducing carbon emissions have accelerated the shift away from coal to natural gas.

By Technology: Thermal power technology can be segmented into combined cycle, cogeneration, and open cycle. Combined cycle technology is the dominant segment due to its higher efficiency and lower emissions compared to traditional open cycle systems. Combined cycle plants use both gas and steam turbines to generate electricity, making them more efficient and a better fit for meeting environmental standards. The operational flexibility and cost-effectiveness of this technology have further solidified its position in the US market.

The US thermal power market is highly competitive, with major players having established strong positions. Companies leverage advanced technology, fuel diversity, and strategic geographic locations to maintain their market leadership. The competitive landscape in the US thermal power market is characterized by the strong presence of key players such as General Electric, Siemens Energy, and Mitsubishi Power, which have a wide range of offerings and advanced technologies. The competition is driven by a combination of fuel efficiency, carbon emissions management, and operational capacity, allowing these companies to remain competitive in the evolving power generation landscape.
|
Company |
Establishment Year |
Headquarters |
Fuel Portfolio |
Operational Capacity |
Technology Expertise |
Market Share |
Geographical Presence |
Carbon Footprint |
Strategic Initiatives |
|
General Electric |
1892 |
Boston, MA |
|||||||
|
Siemens Energy |
1847 |
Munich, Germany |
|||||||
|
Mitsubishi Power |
1870 |
Tokyo, Japan |
|||||||
|
Duke Energy Corporation |
1904 |
Charlotte, NC |
|||||||
|
Southern Company |
1945 |
Atlanta, GA |
Over the next five years, the US thermal power market is expected to witness moderate growth, supported by technological advancements, increased focus on reducing carbon emissions, and regulatory changes. Despite the growing emphasis on renewable energy, thermal power will continue to play a crucial role in the nations energy mix due to its ability to provide reliable base load electricity. Advancements in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies and the increased use of natural gas are anticipated to further enhance the sustainability of thermal power plants.
|
Fuel Type |
Coal Natural Gas Oil |
|
Technology |
Combined Cycle Cogeneration Open Cycle |
|
End-User |
Industrial Residential Commercial |
|
Plant Type |
Base Load Peak Load |
|
Region |
Midwest Northeast West South |
1.1. Definition and Scope
1.2. Market Taxonomy
1.3. Market Growth Rate
1.4. Market Segmentation Overview
2.1. Historical Market Size
2.2. Year-On-Year Growth Analysis
2.3. Key Market Developments and Milestones
3.1. Growth Drivers
3.1.1. Increase in Energy Demand
3.1.2. Technological Advancements in Power Generation
3.1.3. Government Regulations Favoring Power Projects
3.2. Market Challenges
3.2.1. Environmental Concerns Related to Emissions
3.2.2. High Initial Capital Costs
3.2.3. Shift Toward Renewable Energy
3.3. Opportunities
3.3.1. Development of Carbon Capture Technologies
3.3.2. Expansion into Rural and Industrial Power Supply
3.3.3. International Collaborations in Power Projects
3.4. Trends
3.4.1. Increased Use of Combined Cycle Power Plants
3.4.2. Integration of AI in Plant Management
3.4.3. Growth in Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants
3.5. Government Regulation
3.5.1. Clean Air Act and Emission Standards
3.5.2. Subsidies for Energy-Efficient Technologies
3.5.3. Public-Private Partnerships in Power Infrastructure
3.6. SWOT Analysis
3.7. Stake Ecosystem
3.8. Porters Five Forces Analysis
3.9. Competition Ecosystem
4.1. By Fuel Type (In Value %)
4.1.1. Coal
4.1.2. Natural Gas
4.1.3. Oil
4.2. By Technology (In Value %)
4.2.1. Combined Cycle
4.2.2. Cogeneration
4.2.3. Open Cycle
4.3. By End-User (In Value %)
4.3.1. Industrial
4.3.2. Residential
4.3.3. Commercial
4.4. By Plant Type (In Value %)
4.4.1. Base Load Plants
4.4.2. Peak Load Plants
4.5. By Region (In Value %)
4.5.1. Midwest
4.5.2. Northeast
4.5.3. West
4.5.4. South
5.1. Detailed Profiles of Major Companies
5.1.1. General Electric
5.1.2. Siemens Energy
5.1.3. Mitsubishi Power
5.1.4. Duke Energy Corporation
5.1.5. Southern Company
5.1.6. NRG Energy
5.1.7. NextEra Energy
5.1.8. Exelon Corporation
5.1.9. American Electric Power
5.1.10. Vistra Energy
5.1.11. FirstEnergy
5.1.12. Dominion Energy
5.1.13. Entergy Corporation
5.1.14. AES Corporation
5.1.15. Calpine Corporation
5.2. Cross Comparison Parameters (Revenue, Operational Capacity, No. of Employees, Technology Expertise, Fuel Portfolio, Geographical Presence, Carbon Footprint, Power Generation Mix)
5.3. Market Share Analysis
5.4. Strategic Initiatives
5.5. Mergers and Acquisitions
5.6. Investment Analysis
5.7. Venture Capital Funding
5.8. Private Equity Investments
6.1. Environmental Standards and Compliance
6.2. Permitting and Licensing Requirements
6.3. Carbon Emission Policies
7.1. Future Market Size Projections
7.2. Key Factors Driving Future Growth
8.1. By Fuel Type (In Value %)
8.2. By Technology (In Value %)
8.3. By End-User (In Value %)
8.4. By Plant Type (In Value %)
8.5. By Region (In Value %)
9.1. TAM/SAM/SOM Analysis
9.2. Risk Mitigation Strategies
9.3. Investment Opportunities
The initial phase involves constructing an ecosystem map encompassing all major stakeholders within the US Thermal Power Market. This step is underpinned by extensive desk research, utilizing a combination of secondary and proprietary databases to gather comprehensive industry-level information. The primary objective is to identify and define the critical variables that influence market dynamics.
In this phase, historical data pertaining to the US Thermal Power Market is compiled and analyzed. This includes assessing market penetration, the ratio of power plants to consumers, and the resultant revenue generation. Furthermore, an evaluation of operational efficiency statistics will be conducted to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the revenue estimates.
Market hypotheses will be developed and subsequently validated through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) with industry experts representing a diverse array of companies. These consultations will provide valuable operational and financial insights directly from industry practitioners, which will be instrumental in refining and corroborating the market data.
The final phase involves direct engagement with multiple thermal power plant operators to acquire detailed insights into fuel segments, plant efficiency, operational challenges, and consumer preferences. This interaction will serve to verify and complement the statistics derived from the bottom-up approach, ensuring a comprehensive, accurate, and validated analysis of the US Thermal Power Market.
The US thermal power market was valued at USD 180 million, driven by increasing electricity demand, strong industrial output, and government initiatives supporting cleaner power generation technologies.
The US thermal power market faces challenges such as stringent environmental regulations, high initial capital investment, and competition from renewable energy sources. Additionally, the rising operational costs of older coal plants create further challenges.
Key players in the US thermal power market include General Electric, Siemens Energy, Mitsubishi Power, Duke Energy Corporation, and Southern Company. These companies maintain leadership through their large operational capacities and technological advancements.
Growth in the US thermal power market is driven by factors like the increasing adoption of natural gas, government support for cleaner technologies, and the need for stable electricity supply in the industrial and commercial sectors.
Notable trends in the US thermal power market include the adoption of combined cycle power plants, integration of artificial intelligence in plant management, and the increasing role of carbon capture and storage technologies.
What makes us stand out is that our consultants follows Robust, Refine and Result (RRR) methodology. i.e. Robust for clear definitions, approaches and sanity checking, Refine for differentiating respondents facts and opinions and Result for presenting data with story
We have set a benchmark in the industry by offering our clients with syndicated and customized market research reports featuring coverage of entire market as well as meticulous research and analyst insights.
While we don't replace traditional research, we flip the method upside down. Our dual approach of Top Bottom & Bottom Top ensures quality deliverable by not just verifying company fundamentals but also looking at the sector and macroeconomic factors.
With one step in the future, our research team constantly tries to show you the bigger picture. We help with some of the tough questions you may encounter along the way: How is the industry positioned? Best marketing channel? KPI's of competitors? By aligning every element, we help maximize success.
Our report gives you instant access to the answers and sources that other companies might choose to hide. We elaborate each steps of research methodology we have used and showcase you the sample size to earn your trust.
If you need any support, we are here! We pride ourselves on universe strength, data quality, and quick, friendly, and professional service.