
Region:North America
Author(s):Sanjana
Product Code:KROD2808
October 2024
86

By Contaminant Type: The USA food safety testing market is segmented by contaminant type into pathogens, pesticides, GMOs, allergens, and mycotoxins. Pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria hold a dominant market share due to their high prevalence in foodborne illness outbreaks. The need for stringent testing to detect these pathogens in products like meat, poultry, and seafood drives this segment's growth. Additionally, ongoing public health campaigns and regulatory demands for pathogen testing contribute to this segment's importance in ensuring food safety.

By Testing Technology: The market is also segmented by testing technology into traditional methods, immunoassay-based methods, chromatography-based methods, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Among these, immunoassay-based methods dominate the market due to their high specificity, rapid results, and cost-effectiveness. This technology is widely adopted for detecting allergens, pesticides, and bacterial contaminants. Furthermore, advancements in immunoassay kits have made it easier for food testing labs to perform accurate and high-throughput testing.

The USA food safety testing market is consolidated, with a few key players dominating the landscape. These companies are known for their extensive testing capabilities, global presence, and wide product portfolios, which allow them to capture a significant portion of the market. Moreover, they maintain strong relationships with regulatory bodies, giving them an edge in adapting to changes in food safety regulations. The competitive landscape highlights the dominance of global players who have invested heavily in technology, regulatory compliance, and quality assurance. These companies maintain their positions through consistent partnerships, innovation, and acquisitions.
|
Company Name |
Year of Establishment |
Headquarters |
Number of Employees |
Revenue (USD Bn) |
Testing Capabilities |
Certifications |
Partnerships |
R&D Investment |
Market Presence |
|
SGS SA |
1878 |
Geneva, Switzerland |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Eurofins Scientific |
1987 |
Luxembourg |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Intertek Group PLC |
1885 |
London, UK |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Mrieux NutriSciences |
1967 |
Chicago, USA |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Bureau Veritas SA |
1828 |
Paris, France |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Growth Drivers
Market Challenges
The USA food safety testing market is expected to witness significant growth due to the increasing complexity of food supply chains, rising demand for processed and convenience foods, and stricter regulatory frameworks. Innovations in testing methods, such as real-time testing and blockchain integration for traceability, will further accelerate the market. Moreover, the emergence of new foodborne pathogens and allergens will increase the demand for advanced testing methods, providing new opportunities for market players.
Market Opportunities
|
Segments |
Sub-Segments |
|
By Contaminant |
Pathogens Pesticides GMOs Allergens Mycotoxins |
|
By Technology |
Traditional Immunoassay Chromatography PCR NGS |
|
By Food Type |
Meat Poultry Seafood Dairy Products Processed Foods Fruits & Vegetables Grains & Cereals |
|
By End-User |
Food Manufacturers Retailers Food Service Providers Government Bodies Independent Labs |
|
By Region |
North-East Midwest South West |
1.1 Definition and Scope
1.2 Market Taxonomy
1.3 Market Growth Rate
1.4 Market Segmentation Overview
2.1 Historical Market Size
2.2 Year-on-Year Growth Analysis
2.3 Key Market Developments and Milestones
3.1 Growth Drivers
3.1.1 Increasing Demand for Processed Food
3.1.2 Stringent Food Safety Regulations (FDA, USDA)
3.1.3 Rising Consumer Awareness
3.1.4 Technological Advancements in Food Testing
3.2 Market Challenges
3.2.1 High Cost of Testing Procedures
3.2.2 Limited Skilled Workforce
3.2.3 Complexity in Regulatory Compliance
3.3 Opportunities
3.3.1 Growth of Contract Testing Laboratories
3.3.2 Development of Rapid Testing Methods
3.3.3 Expansion into Emerging Food Categories (Plant-based, Organic)
3.4 Trends
3.4.1 Rise in Testing for GMO and Allergens
3.4.2 Increasing Use of Blockchain for Traceability
3.4.3 Demand for Real-time Testing Technologies
3.5 Government Regulations
3.5.1 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)
3.5.2 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) Programs
3.5.3 USDA Organic Regulations
3.5.4 Import and Export Compliance Requirements
3.6 SWOT Analysis
3.7 Stakeholder Ecosystem
3.8 Porters Five Forces
3.9 Competitive Ecosystem
4.1 By Contaminant Type (In Value %)
4.1.1 Pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella, Listeria)
4.1.2 Pesticides
4.1.3 Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
4.1.4 Allergens
4.1.5 Mycotoxins
4.2 By Testing Technology (In Value %)
4.2.1 Traditional Methods
4.2.2 Immunoassay-based Methods
4.2.3 Chromatography-based Methods
4.2.4 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
4.2.5 Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
4.3 By Food Type (In Value %)
4.3.1 Meat, Poultry, and Seafood
4.3.2 Dairy Products
4.3.3 Processed Foods
4.3.4 Fruits and Vegetables
4.3.5 Grains and Cereals
4.4 By End-User (In Value %)
4.4.1 Food Manufacturers
4.4.2 Retailers
4.4.3 Food Service Providers
4.4.4 Government and Regulatory Bodies
4.4.5 Independent Laboratories
4.5 By Region (In Value %)
4.5.1 North-East
4.5.2 Midwest
4.5.3 South
4.5.4 West
5.1 Detailed Profiles of Major Competitors
5.1.1 SGS SA
5.1.2 Eurofins Scientific
5.1.3 Intertek Group PLC
5.1.4 Bureau Veritas SA
5.1.5 ALS Limited
5.1.6 Mrieux NutriSciences Corporation
5.1.7 NSF International
5.1.8 Neogen Corporation
5.1.9 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
5.1.10 Thermo Fisher Scientific
5.1.11 Agilent Technologies Inc.
5.1.12 PerkinElmer Inc.
5.1.13 3M Company
5.1.14 Romer Labs
5.1.15 Charm Sciences Inc.
5.2 Cross Comparison Parameters (Number of Employees, Headquarters, Revenue, Testing Capabilities, Product Portfolio, Certifications, Partnerships, Mergers)
5.3 Market Share Analysis
5.4 Strategic Initiatives
5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.6 Investment Analysis
5.7 Government Contracts and Tenders
5.8 Private Equity Investments
6.1 Food Safety Standards
6.2 Certification Processes
6.3 Import/Export Regulations
6.4 Industry-Specific Safety Regulations
6.5 Compliance with International Food Safety Norms
7.1 Future Market Size Projections
7.2 Key Factors Driving Future Market Growth
8.1 By Contaminant Type (In Value %)
8.2 By Testing Technology (In Value %)
8.3 By Food Type (In Value %)
8.4 By End-User (In Value %)
8.5 By Region (In Value %)
9.1 Total Addressable Market (TAM) Analysis
9.2 Serviceable Available Market (SAM) Analysis
9.3 Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) Analysis
9.4 White Space Opportunities
9.5 Market Entry Strategy Recommendations
The initial phase involves constructing an ecosystem map encompassing all major stakeholders within the USA Food Safety Testing Market. This step is underpinned by extensive desk research, utilizing a combination of secondary and proprietary databases to gather comprehensive industry-level information. The primary objective is to identify and define the critical variables that influence market dynamics.
In this phase, we compile and analyze historical data pertaining to the USA Food Safety Testing Market. This includes assessing market penetration, the ratio of marketplaces to service providers, and the resultant revenue generation. Furthermore, an evaluation of service quality statistics will be conducted to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the revenue estimates.
Market hypotheses are developed and subsequently validated through computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIS) with industry experts representing a diverse array of companies. These consultations provide valuable operational and financial insights directly from industry practitioners, which are instrumental in refining and corroborating the market data.
The final phase involves direct engagement with multiple food safety testing laboratories and manufacturers to acquire detailed insights into product segments, sales performance, consumer preferences, and other pertinent factors. This interaction serves to verify and complement the statistics derived from the bottom-up approach, ensuring a comprehensive, accurate, and validated analysis of the USA Food Safety Testing Market.
The USA food safety testing market is valued at USD 4.2 billion, driven by increasing regulatory requirements, consumer awareness, and technological advancements in food testing methodologies.
Challenges include high testing costs, the complexity of navigating regulatory compliance, and the need for continuous technological upgrades to stay in line with emerging contaminants and pathogens.
Key players in the market include SGS SA, Eurofins Scientific, Intertek Group PLC, Bureau Veritas SA, and Mrieux NutriSciences. These companies dominate due to their extensive lab networks, technological innovations, and strong regulatory relationships.
The market is propelled by factors such as stringent government regulations (e.g., FSMA), increased consumer awareness of foodborne illnesses, and the rise in demand for processed and ready-to-eat foods.
What makes us stand out is that our consultants follows Robust, Refine and Result (RRR) methodology. i.e. Robust for clear definitions, approaches and sanity checking, Refine for differentiating respondents facts and opinions and Result for presenting data with story
We have set a benchmark in the industry by offering our clients with syndicated and customized market research reports featuring coverage of entire market as well as meticulous research and analyst insights.
While we don't replace traditional research, we flip the method upside down. Our dual approach of Top Bottom & Bottom Top ensures quality deliverable by not just verifying company fundamentals but also looking at the sector and macroeconomic factors.
With one step in the future, our research team constantly tries to show you the bigger picture. We help with some of the tough questions you may encounter along the way: How is the industry positioned? Best marketing channel? KPI's of competitors? By aligning every element, we help maximize success.
Our report gives you instant access to the answers and sources that other companies might choose to hide. We elaborate each steps of research methodology we have used and showcase you the sample size to earn your trust.
If you need any support, we are here! We pride ourselves on universe strength, data quality, and quick, friendly, and professional service.