
Region:North America
Author(s):Shubham Kashyap
Product Code:KROD3587
November 2024
86



The U.S. IVD market is highly competitive, with several key players continuously investing in research and development to enhance their product portfolios. Major players include Abbott Laboratories, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roche Diagnostics, Danaher Corporation, and Siemens Healthineers. These companies are leveraging advanced technologies such as digital pathology, molecular diagnostics, and artificial intelligence to maintain a competitive edge in the rapidly evolving diagnostic landscape.
|
Company Name |
Establishment Year |
Headquarters |
No. of Employees |
Revenue (USD) |
Key Products |
Sustainability Initiatives |
Geographical Reach |
Technology Adoption |
Partnerships |
|
Abbott Laboratories |
1888 |
Abbott Park, IL |
|||||||
|
Thermo Fisher Scientific |
1956 |
Waltham, MA |
|||||||
|
Roche Diagnostics |
1896 |
Basel, Switzerland |
|||||||
|
Danaher Corporation |
1984 |
Washington, D.C. |
|||||||
|
Siemens Healthineers |
1847 |
Erlangen, Germany |
Growth Drivers
Market Challenges
The U.S. In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) Market is projected to grow steadily over the next five years, driven by increasing healthcare expenditure, the growing adoption of personalized medicine, and technological advancements in diagnostics. The expansion of telemedicine and home testing kits will also play a crucial role in the future of IVD, enabling wider access to diagnostic services.
Future Market Opportunities
|
By Application |
Infectious Disease Testing Oncology Testing Cardiovascular Testing Genetic Testing Diabetes Monitoring |
|
By Technology |
Molecular Diagnostics Immunoassays Clinical Chemistry Hematology Microbiology Testing |
|
By Distribution Channel |
Hospitals and Clinics Diagnostic Laboratories Research Institutes Homecare Settings Academic Institutions |
|
By Mode of Delivery |
Laboratory-Based Testing Point-of-Care Testing Home-Based Testing |
|
By Region |
Northeast Midwest South West |
1.1. Definition and Scope
1.2. Market Taxonomy
1.3. Market Growth Rate
1.4. Market Segmentation Overview
2.1. Historical Market Size
2.2. Year-On-Year Growth Analysis
2.3. Key Market Developments and Milestones
3.1. Growth Drivers (Market-specific drivers)
3.1.1. Technological Advancements in Diagnostics
3.1.2. Growing Adoption of Personalized Medicine
3.1.3. Increase in Chronic Disease Prevalence
3.1.4. Rise of Point-of-Care Testing
3.2. Market Challenges (Market-specific challenges)
3.2.1. Regulatory Hurdles in IVD Approvals
3.2.2. Ethical and Privacy Concerns in Genetic Testing
3.2.3. High Cost of Advanced Diagnostic Equipment
3.2.4. Complex Reimbursement Landscape
3.3. Opportunities (Market-specific opportunities)
3.3.1. Expansion of Home-Based Testing Kits
3.3.2. Integration with Digital Health Platforms
3.3.3. Growing Demand for Companion Diagnostics
3.3.4. Development of AI-Powered Diagnostic Solutions
3.4. Trends (Market-specific trends)
3.4.1. Emergence of Telemedicine-Based Diagnostics
3.4.2. Adoption of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
3.4.3. Increasing Use of Liquid Biopsies
3.4.4. Automation in Diagnostic Laboratories
3.5. Government Regulation (Regulatory bodies and laws)
3.5.1. FDA Approval Process for IVD Devices
3.5.2. CLIA Regulations for Diagnostic Laboratories
3.5.3. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
3.5.4. Compliance with HIPAA Regulations
3.6. SWOT Analysis
3.7. Stake Ecosystem (Market-specific stakeholders)
3.8. Porters Five Forces
3.9. Competition Ecosystem
4.1. By Application (In Value %)
4.1.1. Infectious Disease Testing
4.1.2. Oncology Testing
4.1.3. Cardiovascular Testing
4.1.4. Genetic Testing
4.1.5. Diabetes Monitoring
4.2. By Technology (In Value %)
4.2.1. Molecular Diagnostics
4.2.2. Immunoassays
4.2.3. Clinical Chemistry
4.2.4. Hematology
4.2.5. Microbiology Testing
4.3. By End User (In Value %)
4.3.1. Hospitals and Clinics
4.3.2. Diagnostic Laboratories
4.3.3. Research Institutes
4.3.4. Homecare Settings
4.3.5. Academic Institutions
4.4. By Mode of Delivery (In Value %)
4.4.1. Laboratory-Based Testing
4.4.2. Point-of-Care Testing
4.4.3. Home-Based Testing
4.5. By Region (In Value %)
4.5.1. Northeast
4.5.2. Midwest
4.5.3. South
4.5.4. West
5.1. Detailed Profiles of Major Companies
5.1.1. Abbott Laboratories
5.1.2. Thermo Fisher Scientific
5.1.3. Roche Diagnostics
5.1.4. Danaher Corporation
5.1.5. Siemens Healthineers
5.1.6. Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD)
5.1.7. Hologic, Inc.
5.1.8. Bio-Rad Laboratories
5.1.9. Qiagen N.V.
5.1.10. Illumina, Inc.
5.1.11. Sysmex Corporation
5.1.12. Agilent Technologies
5.1.13. Ortho Clinical Diagnostics
5.1.14. PerkinElmer Inc.
5.1.15. Beckman Coulter
5.2. Cross Comparison Parameters (Headquarters, Employees, Revenue, Technology Adoption, Product Portfolio, Key Strategic Partnerships, Market Presence, Recent Innovations)
5.3. Market Share Analysis
5.4. Strategic Initiatives
5.5. Mergers and Acquisitions
5.6. Investment Analysis
5.7. Venture Capital Funding
5.8. Government Grants
5.9. Private Equity Investments
6.1. FDA Guidelines for IVD Device Approval
6.2. CLIA Certification Requirements
6.3. HIPAA Compliance for Diagnostic Data
6.4. GINA Regulations on Genetic Testing
7.1. Future Market Size Projections
7.2. Key Factors Driving Future Market Growth
8.1. By Application (In Value %)
8.2. By Technology (In Value %)
8.3. By End User (In Value %)
8.4. By Mode of Delivery (In Value %)
8.5. By Region (In Value %)
9.1. TAM/SAM/SOM Analysis
9.2. Customer Cohort Analysis
9.3. Marketing Initiatives
9.4. White Space Opportunity Analysis
In this phase, a comprehensive ecosystem map of the U.S. IVD market was constructed. This involved detailed desk research using proprietary databases and secondary sources to define the key variables affecting market dynamics. Critical factors influencing market growth, technological adoption, and stakeholder engagement were identified to provide a solid foundation for the research.
Historical data was compiled and analyzed, covering key market trends, technological adoption, and market penetration across different regions. The analysis also included a deep dive into the contribution of different market segments such as infectious disease testing and molecular diagnostics to the overall revenue generation.
Market hypotheses were developed based on the collected data and then validated through consultations with industry experts from leading diagnostic companies. These interviews provided valuable operational and financial insights, helping refine market data and projections. Industry leaders' insights added depth and accuracy to the findings.
The final step involved synthesizing the data gathered from various sources, including direct engagement with IVD manufacturers and healthcare providers. This comprehensive approach ensured that the analysis covered all market nuances and provided an accurate portrayal of the U.S. IVD market. The research outputs were validated using both top-down and bottom-up approaches.
The U.S. In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) market is valued at USD 29 billion, driven by advancements in diagnostic technologies and increasing demand for chronic disease management.
Challenges in the U.S. IVD market include strict regulatory requirements, high costs associated with advanced diagnostic equipment, and concerns over the ethical use of genetic testing data.
Key players in the U.S. In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) market include Abbott Laboratories, Roche Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Danaher Corporation, and Siemens Healthineers. These companies are dominant due to their innovation and extensive product portfolios.
The U.S. In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) market is driven by the growing prevalence of chronic diseases, increasing adoption of molecular diagnostics, and technological advancements in point-of-care testing and automation.
What makes us stand out is that our consultants follows Robust, Refine and Result (RRR) methodology. i.e. Robust for clear definitions, approaches and sanity checking, Refine for differentiating respondents facts and opinions and Result for presenting data with story
We have set a benchmark in the industry by offering our clients with syndicated and customized market research reports featuring coverage of entire market as well as meticulous research and analyst insights.
While we don't replace traditional research, we flip the method upside down. Our dual approach of Top Bottom & Bottom Top ensures quality deliverable by not just verifying company fundamentals but also looking at the sector and macroeconomic factors.
With one step in the future, our research team constantly tries to show you the bigger picture. We help with some of the tough questions you may encounter along the way: How is the industry positioned? Best marketing channel? KPI's of competitors? By aligning every element, we help maximize success.
Our report gives you instant access to the answers and sources that other companies might choose to hide. We elaborate each steps of research methodology we have used and showcase you the sample size to earn your trust.
If you need any support, we are here! We pride ourselves on universe strength, data quality, and quick, friendly, and professional service.