Shopping Cart 0
Cart Subtotal
USD 0

Clothing retailers ethical problems : Consumer-retailer relationship allows issues to persist

Restricted to one authorized user; Open on 1 PC/ mobile / Tablet only.
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: No
Deliverable Format : PDF Via Email

Single User License
USD 995

Restricted to one authorized user; Open on 1 PC/ mobile / Tablet only.
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: No
Deliverable Format : PDF Via Email

Site License
USD 1990

Multiple Users within the Company/ Enterprise
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: Yes
Deliverable Format : Excel, PDF Via Email

Corporate User License
USD 2985
  • Details
  • Table Of Content
  • Licence Rights
  • Section Purchase

Details

Clothing retailers' ethical problems : Consumer-retailer relationship allows issues to persist

Summary

Subject to numerous scandals regarding ethical behavior for longer than many people care to remember, clothing retailers face a challenging future. In the age of 'fast fashion' some problems-such as the use of fur-many thought had gone have now returned to the mainstream. Unethical behavior issues within the garment industry can be traced back to the relationship between the consumer and the retailer, resulting in problems failing to gain sufficient attention, although some progress has occurred, to inspire change at the top of the clothing industry in the United Kingdom.

Key Highlights

Real fur has returned to the high-street without the knowledge of consumers. Under pressure to create fast fashion, retailers have failed to maintain the required level of security in the supply chain. Without the current relationship between consumers and retailers, such a turn of events would not have been possible.

The environmental impact of fast fashion is huge. Manufacturing one ton of cotton requires thousands of cubic meters of water and creates large quantities of waste. Extending the time clothing is used for, even by a few months, dramatically cuts down on the amount of waste and damage each consumer is responsible for.

Although all companies espouse ethical policies, actions are carefully designed as to avoid damaging the fast fashion business model so many retailers depend upon. Sustainability is, therefore, predicated on the relationship between consumer and retailer. For the industry to become more ethical and sustainable, the business case for change has to be clear.

Scope

Examines the return of fur to popular stores

Looks the continuing problem of working conditions

Assesses the prospect of new ethical shops conjuring popularity

Details the environmental impact of fast fashion

Reasons to buy

Why has fur returned to high-street products?

What is the impact of fast fashion on labor rights?

What are the environmental consequences of fast fashion?

Can a new ethical brand enter the mainstream market?

READ MORE

Table Of Content

Scope

Table of Contents

Overview 2

Catalyst 2

Summary 2

Fur returns as retailers fail to uphold ethical policies 6

Retailers found to be selling real fur marketed as faux fur-commercial impact appears only temporary 6

Cost demands and fashion tastes put pressure on ethical policies as fur returns to the catwalk 7

Labor rights problems continue despite bad publicity 9

Bangladesh factory collapse demonstrates dangers of shying away from labor rights 9

Fast fashion encourages retailers to flirt with bad working practices in factories 10

Clothing has a big environmental impact-retailers are under little pressure to act 12

Piles of used clothing represents a growing environmental problem with fast fashion 12

Water consumption is a big problem for the industry-retailers are under little pressure to change 13

Sustainability policies are framed in context of business benefit 14

Sustainability is increasingly influential to a successful brand image 14

Key selling points come before sustainable policies to protect bottom line 15

Consumer demands make life harder for new ethical clothing brands 17

Cotton On shows ethical trading is possible but economies of scale are important 17

Commercial reality is tough for brands predicated on ethical trading 18

Conclusions 20

Relationship between consumers and retailers allows ethical problems to continue 20

Appendix 21

Sources 21

Further Reading 21

Ask the analyst 22

About MarketLine 22

Disclaimer 22


List Of Figure

List of Figures

Figure 1: ASOS Share price before and after reports of fur in products 12/04/2016-04/01/2017 7

Figure 2: Fur entering fashion 8

Figure 3: Syrian child refugees photographed in Turkish clothing factory, BBC 10

Figure 4: M&S Plan A branding 15

Figure 5: Cotton On store 17

Figure 6: Clothing from ethical retailer Thought 18


List Of Table

List of Tables

Table 1: Number of garment factories and workers in Bangladesh, 2001-2016 9

Table 2: Average footprint from fabric production (per tonne) 12

Table 3: Predicted carbon and water savings from using clothing for longer 14

Licence Rights

Single User License:
Report can be used by individual purchaser only

Site License: 
Report can be shared by unlimited users within one corporate location, e.g. a regional office

Corporate User License:  
Report can be shared globally by unlimited users within the purchasing corporation e.g. all employees of a single company

Section Purchase

To know more information on Purchase by Section, please send a mail to support@kenresearch.com

Clothing retailers' ethical problems : Consumer-retailer relationship allows issues to persist

Summary

Subject to numerous scandals regarding ethical behavior for longer than many people care to remember, clothing retailers face a challenging future. In the age of 'fast fashion' some problems-such as the use of fur-many thought had gone have now returned to the mainstream. Unethical behavior issues within the garment industry can be traced back to the relationship between the consumer and the retailer, resulting in problems failing to gain sufficient attention, although some progress has occurred, to inspire change at the top of the clothing industry in the United Kingdom.

Key Highlights

Real fur has returned to the high-street without the knowledge of consumers. Under pressure to create fast fashion, retailers have failed to maintain the required level of security in the supply chain. Without the current relationship between consumers and retailers, such a turn of events would not have been possible.

The environmental impact of fast fashion is huge. Manufacturing one ton of cotton requires thousands of cubic meters of water and creates large quantities of waste. Extending the time clothing is used for, even by a few months, dramatically cuts down on the amount of waste and damage each consumer is responsible for.

Although all companies espouse ethical policies, actions are carefully designed as to avoid damaging the fast fashion business model so many retailers depend upon. Sustainability is, therefore, predicated on the relationship between consumer and retailer. For the industry to become more ethical and sustainable, the business case for change has to be clear.

Scope

Examines the return of fur to popular stores

Looks the continuing problem of working conditions

Assesses the prospect of new ethical shops conjuring popularity

Details the environmental impact of fast fashion

Reasons to buy

Why has fur returned to high-street products?

What is the impact of fast fashion on labor rights?

What are the environmental consequences of fast fashion?

Can a new ethical brand enter the mainstream market?

READ MORE

Scope

Table of Contents

Overview 2

Catalyst 2

Summary 2

Fur returns as retailers fail to uphold ethical policies 6

Retailers found to be selling real fur marketed as faux fur-commercial impact appears only temporary 6

Cost demands and fashion tastes put pressure on ethical policies as fur returns to the catwalk 7

Labor rights problems continue despite bad publicity 9

Bangladesh factory collapse demonstrates dangers of shying away from labor rights 9

Fast fashion encourages retailers to flirt with bad working practices in factories 10

Clothing has a big environmental impact-retailers are under little pressure to act 12

Piles of used clothing represents a growing environmental problem with fast fashion 12

Water consumption is a big problem for the industry-retailers are under little pressure to change 13

Sustainability policies are framed in context of business benefit 14

Sustainability is increasingly influential to a successful brand image 14

Key selling points come before sustainable policies to protect bottom line 15

Consumer demands make life harder for new ethical clothing brands 17

Cotton On shows ethical trading is possible but economies of scale are important 17

Commercial reality is tough for brands predicated on ethical trading 18

Conclusions 20

Relationship between consumers and retailers allows ethical problems to continue 20

Appendix 21

Sources 21

Further Reading 21

Ask the analyst 22

About MarketLine 22

Disclaimer 22


List Of Figure

List of Figures

Figure 1: ASOS Share price before and after reports of fur in products 12/04/2016-04/01/2017 7

Figure 2: Fur entering fashion 8

Figure 3: Syrian child refugees photographed in Turkish clothing factory, BBC 10

Figure 4: M&S Plan A branding 15

Figure 5: Cotton On store 17

Figure 6: Clothing from ethical retailer Thought 18


List Of Table

List of Tables

Table 1: Number of garment factories and workers in Bangladesh, 2001-2016 9

Table 2: Average footprint from fabric production (per tonne) 12

Table 3: Predicted carbon and water savings from using clothing for longer 14

Single User License:
Report can be used by individual purchaser only

Site License: 
Report can be shared by unlimited users within one corporate location, e.g. a regional office

Corporate User License:  
Report can be shared globally by unlimited users within the purchasing corporation e.g. all employees of a single company

To know more information on Purchase by Section, please send a mail to support@kenresearch.com