Shopping Cart 0
Cart Subtotal
USD 0

Failure Case Study: Coca-Cola Life-Targeting the middle ground fails to resonate with consumers

Restricted to one authorized user; Open on 1 PC/ mobile / Tablet only.
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: No
Deliverable Format : PDF Via Email

Single User License
USD 995

Restricted to one authorized user; Open on 1 PC/ mobile / Tablet only.
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: No
Deliverable Format : PDF Via Email

Site License
USD 1990

Multiple Users within the Company/ Enterprise
Print Option: Yes
Copy Option: Yes
Deliverable Format : Excel, PDF Via Email

Corporate User License
USD 2985
  • Details
  • Table Of Content
  • Licence Rights
  • Section Purchase
  • Products and Companies

Details

Failure Case Study: Coca-Cola Life-Targeting the "middle ground" fails to resonate with consumers

Summary

"Failure Case Study: Coca-Cola Life" is part of GlobalData's Successes and Failures research. It examines the details of and reasons behind Coca-Cola's first moderate-calorie cola's failure in the UK. It delivers the critical "what?", "why?", and "so what?" analysis to teach you crucial lessons that increase your chances of launching successful products as well as avoiding risks.

In the UK, Coca-Cola Life sold 21.5 million liters in 2015, accounting for just 1.2% of the total UK sales of Coca-Cola's four main colas. The country has a relatively large market for diet colas, so understandably the new lower-sugar and -calorie cola was considered to have potential. However, Coca-Cola Life struggled to resonate with UK consumers, who could not see the advantages over the already popular zero-sugar Coke Zero and Diet Coke options.

Scope

Launched in the UK in 2014, Coca-Cola Life contained 36% fewer calories than regular Coca-Cola, due to a formulation that used stevia extract to reduce the sugar content by 37%. Despite a lot of publicity upon launch and a recipe reformulation to reduce sugar and calories further, Cola-Cola Life is now in the process of being pulled from shelves.

The "in-between" formulation failed to appeal to consumers, given the brand already had zero-sugar and -calorie options (Coke Zero and Diet Coke) available as an alternative to standard Coca-Cola.

Adopting a "middle-ground" approach is risky, especially if it fails to address a genuine consumer need.

Soft drinks purchases are driven by brand familiarity, sensory attributes, and health, yet Coca-Cola Life failed to resonate because it did not offer clear advantages over Coke's existing line-up.

Developing breakfast cereal influenced by Western culture to meet local sensory preferences generates opportunities.

Reasons to buy

Reduce the risk of failure by learning from brands/products that have under-performed: failed innovation can severely impact profit and reputation.

Understand the relevant consumer trends and attitudes that drive and support innovation success so you can tap into what is really impacting the industry.

Gain a broader appreciation of the fast-moving consumer goods industry by gaining insights from both within and outside of your sector.

Access valuable strategic take-outs to help direct future decision-making and inform new product development.

READ MORE

Table Of Content

Scope

Table of Contents

About Successes & Failures Case Studies

Summary: Coca-Cola Life

What?

Why?

Take-out

TrendSights

Appendix


List Of Figure


List Of Table

Licence Rights

Single User License:
Report can be used by individual purchaser only

Site License:
Report can be shared by unlimited users within one corporate location, e.g. a regional office

Corporate User License: 
Report can be shared globally by unlimited users within the purchasing corporation e.g. all employees of a single company

Section Purchase

To know more information on Purchase by Section, please send a mail to support@kenresearch.com

Products and Companies


Companies

Coca-Cola, Pepsi